Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Representation of the People Act, 1950

36 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SUBHASH DESAIversusSHARAD J. RAO AND ORS.

1994 INSC 13631 March 1994Dismissed

Subhash Desai, elected from Goregaon as a Shiv Sena candidate, was challenged by Sharad J. Rao of Janata Dal for alleged corrupt practices. The election petition alleged that Desai had appealed to voters on religious grounds, published a false newspaper report to vilify Rao, and incited communal hatred, violating Secti

INDRAJIT BARIJA & ORS. ETC.versusELECTION COMMLSSION OF INDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 21030 September 1985Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the 1983 Assam Legislative Assembly election, alleging that the electoral rolls of 1979 were defective because they had not been revised as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and allegedly contained non‑citizens. They filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitut

LAKSHMI CHARAN SEN AND ORS ETC.versusA.K.M. HASSAN UZZAMAN AMO ORS. ETC.

1982 INSC 4330 March 1982Disposed off

The Calcutta High Court entertained a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the Chief Election Commissioner, the Chief Electoral Officer and the Election Commission of India for allegedly issuing vague and arbitrary directions for a de novo revision of West Bengal's electoral rolls and for proceeding with electio

SHYAMDEO PRASAD SINGHversusNAWAL KISHORE YADAV

2000 INSC 41528 August 2000Dismissed

In April 1996 a biennial election was held for the Patna Teachers Constituency of the Bihar Legislative Council and Nawal Kishore Yadav was declared elected. The petitioner filed an election petition alleging that a large number of persons who were not qualified under the 1950 Act had been improperly enrolled in the el

SUNIL KUMAR KORI & ANR.versusGOPAL DAS KABRA & ORS. ETC.

2016 INSC 92227 September 2016Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether persons residing in illegally constructed houses (encroachers) within a cantonment area are entitled to vote in Cantonment Board elections. The Court interpreted the Cantonment Act, 2006 and its definitions of "resident" and "inhabitant", holding that only a person who maintains a leg

P.T RAJANversusT.P.M. SAHIR AND ORS.

2003 INSC 51426 September 2003Dismissed

In the 2001 Kozhikode Assembly election, the appellant, election agent of the defeated candidate, alleged that after the 3 p.m. deadline for filing nominations, 19,045 names were deleted and 6,828 added to the electoral roll, rendering the election void. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the appellant

IQBAL SINGHversusAVTAR SINGH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 28526 July 1994Dismissed

The appellant, Iqbal Singh, contested the 1992 Faridkot Assembly election and filed an election petition under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, alleging that the returned candidate and a party president conspired to induce another candidate to withdraw in exchange for his appointment as General

K. VENKATACHALAMversusA. SWAMICKAN AND ANR.

1999 INSC 20326 April 1999Dismissed

In the 1984 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election, K. Venkatachalam was declared elected despite not being an elector in the Lalgudi constituency, having impersonated another person of the same name. The defeated candidate, A. Swamickan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a declaration that Venkatachala

S.S. DHANOAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1991 INSC 16224 July 1991Dismissed

The petitioners, appointed as Election Commissioners in October 1989, challenged the President’s January 1990 notifications that rescinded their appointments and abolished the two posts. They argued that the abolition violated the tenure provisions in the service rules, infringed the independence of the Election Commis

PUBLIC INTEREST COMMITTEE FOR SCHEDULING SPECIFIC AREAS AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 108623 November 2023Disposed off

The Public Interest Committee sought proportional representation for the Limboo‑Tamang Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha and the legislative assemblies of West Bengal and Sikkim, arguing that the 2006 Delimitation Notification and the 2008 Delimitation Order failed to incorporate the tribes after their inclusion under

PUNIT RAIversusDINESH CHAUDHARY

2003 INSC 40019 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioner challenged the election of Dinesh Chaudhary to a Bihar Assembly seat reserved for Scheduled Castes, alleging that Chaudhary was a Kurmi (OBC) and not a Pasi (SC). The Returning Officer, despite lodging an FIR and having grave doubts about Chaudhary's caste certificate, accepted his nomination paper. The

ACTION COMMITTEE ON ISSUE OF CASTE CERTIFICATE TO SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 26218 July 1994Dismissed

The Action Committee on Issue of Caste Certificate filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging Maharashtra's denial of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe benefits to persons who had migrated from other states. The petition argued that the denial violated Articles 14, 15(1), 16(2), 19 and the spirit of Articles

IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus

2024 INSC 78917 October 2024Reference answered

The case concerns the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which grants citizenship to certain migrants from Bangladesh to Assam based on cut-off dates (before 1.1.1966 and between 1.1.1966 and 25.3.1971). The provision was enacted to implement the Assam Accord. Petitioners challenged it

DIGVIJAY MOTEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 26416 August 1993Dismissed

The petitioner, Digvijay Mote, filed a public‑interest writ petition alleging that the electoral process in India was distorted, citing the absence of representation from Assam and Jammu & Kashmir in successive Lok Sabhas. He sought sweeping reliefs including staying the functioning of the existing Lok Sabha, restraini

KAKA JOGINDER SINGH ALIAS DHARTI PAKADversusK.R. NARAYANAN VICE PRESIDENT OF INDIA

1993 INSC 23816 July 1993Dismissed

Kaka Joginder Singh alias Dharti Pakad challenged the election of K.R. Narayanan as Vice‑President of India, alleging (i) that the Returning Officer wrongly accepted Narayanan's nomination despite substantial defects, and (ii) that a whip issued by the Congress party amounted to undue influence under the Presidential a

LAXMI KANT BAJPAIversusHAZI YAQOOB & ORS.

2009 INSC 131015 December 2009Dismissed

The appellant, Laxmi Kant Bajpai, challenged the election of Hazi Yaqoob to the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly on the ground that votes from 21 localities, allegedly outside the delimitation order, were improperly included in the electoral roll, violating Sections 100(1)(d)(iii) and (iv) of the Representation of th

JAGANNATH RAMCHANDRA NUNEKARversusGENU GOVIND KADAM & OTHERS

1988 INSC 27714 September 1988Case Allowed

Jagannath Ramchandra Nunekar, an elector from Shivaji Nagar, sought to contest a bye‑election in Jaoli and applied for a certified copy of his entry in the Shivaji Nagar electoral roll. He received a copy on 8 January 1986 showing the latest publication date as 31‑Jan‑1984 and filed his nomination on 9 January, but the

MCDversusVEENA AND ORS.

2001 INSC 36314 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) advertised vacancies for primary and nursery teachers and required OBC candidates to submit certificates issued by competent authorities. Several applicants submitted OBC certificates issued by authorities in their home states outside Delhi, which MCD rejected, citing a Delhi go

D.B. RAJUversusH.J. KANTHARAJ AND OTHERS

1990 INSC 20213 July 1990Dismissed

The appellant D.B. Raju contested his election to the Karnataka Legislative Council, alleging that the 242 nominated members from 121 Mandal Panchayats were added to the electoral roll after the deadline for filing nomination papers (3 p.m., 3 June 1988). The High Court held that the roll was not updated by that time a

HAJI ABDUL GANI KHAN & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 12413 February 2023Dismissed

The petition challenged the increase in seats of the Jammu and Kashmir Union Territory Legislative Assembly and the constitution of a Delimitation Commission under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 and the Delimitation Act, 2002. The Court held that Article 170, which governs State legislatures, does not a

HARISHANKAR JAINversusSONIA GANDHI

2001 INSC 43812 September 2001Dismissed

The appellants Hari Shanker Jain and Hari Krishna Lal challenged the election of Sonia Gandhi to the Lok Sabha, alleging that she was not a citizen of India despite holding a certificate of citizenship under Section 5(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. They also questioned the constitutional validity of the Citizenshi

STATE OF GOA & ANR.versusFOUZIYA IMTIAZ SHAIKH & ANR.

2021 INSC 17912 March 2021Disposed off

The State of Goa appointed its Law Secretary as State Election Commissioner (SEC) to oversee municipal elections that had been postponed due to COVID‑19. The SEC, acting under this dual role, issued a reservation order on 4 February 2021 and a subsequent election schedule, which were challenged in writ petitions allegi

THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER ETC.versusJAN CHAUKIDAR (PEOPLES WATCH) & ORS

2013 INSC 45710 July 2013Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the view that a person confined in prison or in police custody, who is barred from voting under sub‑section (5) of Section 62 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, is not an elector and therefore cannot contest elections. The High Court held that such a person loses the statutory rig

ADIVASIS FOR SOCIAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 51210 May 2023Dismissed

The appellant, a society, challenged the applicability of various Central and State statutes to the Sundargarh district of Orissa, which had been declared a Scheduled Area under Clause 6 of the Fifth Schedule. It contended that non‑tribals could not settle, vote, or contest elections there and that all constituencies s

R.C. POUDYAL AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1993 INSC 5110 February 1993Dismissed

The petitions filed by Sikkimese of Nepali origin challenged the reservation of twelve seats for Bhutia‑Lepcha and one seat for the Buddhist Sangha in the Sikkim Legislative Assembly, arguing that these provisions violated Articles 14, 15(1), 325, 332(3) and the basic structure of the Constitution. The Court examined w

ANUKUL CHANDRA PRADHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5459 July 1997Dismissed

Anukul Chandrapradhan filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which bars prisoners and persons in police custody from voting, except those under preventive detention. He contended that the provision violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution a

B. DANDAPANI PATRAversusRETURNING OFFICER-CUM-SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BERHAMPUR AND OTHERS

1989 INSC 3388 November 1989Dismissed

The appellant, a candidate for the Orissa Legislative Assembly, filed his nomination from Gopalpur while being an elector in Sorada. He submitted an attested copy of the Sorada electoral roll as it existed on 21 July 1983, arguing that this satisfied the requirement of Section 33(5) of the Representation of the People

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIAversusST. MARYS SCHOOL AND ORS.

2007 INSC 12416 December 2007Dismissed

The petitioners, an unaided school governed by the Delhi School Education Act, challenged the Election Commission’s practice of deploying teachers from government schools for election‑related duties during school hours, alleging that it disrupted education and violated the right to education. The Delhi High Court had d

LAL BABU HUSSEIN AND ORS.versusELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER AND ORS.

1995 INSC 986 February 1995Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the Election Commission's directives that empowered district collectors and police to determine a person's citizenship and delete alleged foreign nationals from electoral rolls. Petitioners challenged the procedure, arguing that notices relied solely on police reports, limited the documents t

BHADAR RAM (D) THR. LRS.versusJASSA RAM & ORS.

2022 INSC 155 January 2022Dismissed

The land in Rajasthan was allotted to Chunilal, a Scheduled Caste (SC) landless person, who was induced to sign a sale deed in favour of Bhadar Ram, an SC resident of Punjab, through fraud by Puran Singh, a non‑SC. The trial court held the sale void as it violated Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 and Secti

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.versusUTTAM SINGH

2021 INSC 3783 August 2021Leave Granted & Dismissed

The appellant, the State of Uttar Pradesh, challenged the High Court's order granting a compassionate appointment to Uttam Singh, whose father had served as a part‑time tubewell operator but was treated as a regular employee. The father had been appointed against a regular vacancy, served for 13 years, was transferred

POTHULA RAMA RAOversusPENDYALA VENKATA KRISHNA RAO AND ORS.

2007 INSC 8042 August 2007Dismissed

The appellant, a voter, filed an election petition seeking to declare the election of the first respondent, a legislator, void on four grounds: improper rejection of a dummy candidate’s nomination, acceptance of the respondent’s nomination despite a double entry in the electoral roll, acceptance of a Bahujan Samaj Part

ANOOP BARANWALversusUNION OF INDIA

2023 INSC 1902 March 2023Case Partly allowed

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity of the practice of appointing the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs) solely by the executive. The Supreme Court examined Article 324(2) and Constituent Assembly debates, concluding that Parliament was intended to enact a law gover

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusDR. MANMOHAN SINGH AND ORS.

1999 INSC 5371 December 1999Dismissed

Dr. Manmohan Singh, then a Union Cabinet Minister, filed Form No.1 under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 stating that but for his office he would be ordinarily resident in the Dispur Assembly constituency of Assam. The Election Commission questioned this declaration, initiated an enquiry and the Chief Election

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIAversusMOHD. ABDUL GHANI AND ORS.

1995 INSC 6601 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Sixteen villages that were originally part of Murshidabad district and fell within the Jangipur Parliamentary Constituency under the Delimitation Order, 1976, were later administratively transferred to the district of Maida due to a change in the course of the River Ganges. The residents filed a writ petition seeking a

I. VIKHESHE SEMAversusHOKISHE SEMA

1996 INSC 6011 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

In the 1993 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election for Dimapur Constituency No.1, Vikheshe Sema was declared winner by a margin of 137 votes over Hokishe Sema. The respondent filed an election petition alleging that duplicate entries in the electoral roll had allowed some voters to cast more than one vote, thereby mate

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search