Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Representation of the People Act, 1950

10 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SUNIL KUMAR KORI & ANR.versusGOPAL DAS KABRA & ORS. ETC.

2016 INSC 92227 September 2016Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether persons residing in illegally constructed houses (encroachers) within a cantonment area are entitled to vote in Cantonment Board elections. The Court interpreted the Cantonment Act, 2006 and its definitions of "resident" and "inhabitant", holding that only a person who maintains a leg

PUBLIC INTEREST COMMITTEE FOR SCHEDULING SPECIFIC AREAS AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 108623 November 2023Disposed off

The Public Interest Committee sought proportional representation for the Limboo‑Tamang Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha and the legislative assemblies of West Bengal and Sikkim, arguing that the 2006 Delimitation Notification and the 2008 Delimitation Order failed to incorporate the tribes after their inclusion under

IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955 versus

2024 INSC 78917 October 2024Reference answered

The case concerns the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which grants citizenship to certain migrants from Bangladesh to Assam based on cut-off dates (before 1.1.1966 and between 1.1.1966 and 25.3.1971). The provision was enacted to implement the Assam Accord. Petitioners challenged it

HAJI ABDUL GANI KHAN & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 12413 February 2023Dismissed

The petition challenged the increase in seats of the Jammu and Kashmir Union Territory Legislative Assembly and the constitution of a Delimitation Commission under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 and the Delimitation Act, 2002. The Court held that Article 170, which governs State legislatures, does not a

STATE OF GOA & ANR.versusFOUZIYA IMTIAZ SHAIKH & ANR.

2021 INSC 17912 March 2021Disposed off

The State of Goa appointed its Law Secretary as State Election Commissioner (SEC) to oversee municipal elections that had been postponed due to COVID‑19. The SEC, acting under this dual role, issued a reservation order on 4 February 2021 and a subsequent election schedule, which were challenged in writ petitions allegi

THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER ETC.versusJAN CHAUKIDAR (PEOPLES WATCH) & ORS

2013 INSC 45710 July 2013Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the view that a person confined in prison or in police custody, who is barred from voting under sub‑section (5) of Section 62 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, is not an elector and therefore cannot contest elections. The High Court held that such a person loses the statutory rig

ADIVASIS FOR SOCIAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 51210 May 2023Dismissed

The appellant, a society, challenged the applicability of various Central and State statutes to the Sundargarh district of Orissa, which had been declared a Scheduled Area under Clause 6 of the Fifth Schedule. It contended that non‑tribals could not settle, vote, or contest elections there and that all constituencies s

BHADAR RAM (D) THR. LRS.versusJASSA RAM & ORS.

2022 INSC 155 January 2022Dismissed

The land in Rajasthan was allotted to Chunilal, a Scheduled Caste (SC) landless person, who was induced to sign a sale deed in favour of Bhadar Ram, an SC resident of Punjab, through fraud by Puran Singh, a non‑SC. The trial court held the sale void as it violated Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 and Secti

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.versusUTTAM SINGH

2021 INSC 3783 August 2021Leave Granted & Dismissed

The appellant, the State of Uttar Pradesh, challenged the High Court's order granting a compassionate appointment to Uttam Singh, whose father had served as a part‑time tubewell operator but was treated as a regular employee. The father had been appointed against a regular vacancy, served for 13 years, was transferred

ANOOP BARANWALversusUNION OF INDIA

2023 INSC 1902 March 2023Case Partly allowed

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity of the practice of appointing the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (ECs) solely by the executive. The Supreme Court examined Article 324(2) and Constituent Assembly debates, concluding that Parliament was intended to enact a law gover

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search