Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952

27 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DAYAL SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 4429 January 2003Dismissed

The appellants' lands were requisitioned and later acquired for a military cantonment under the Defence of India Act and the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. They entered into compensation agreements under the 1952 Act, but later sought higher compensation, solatium and interest based on

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusKRISHAN LAL ARNEJA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 32228 April 2004Dismissed

Fourteen properties requisitioned by the Union of India were later notified for acquisition under Sections 4 and 17(1)&(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court had quashed the notification on the ground that there was no urgency and that the owners' right to object under Section 5A was denied. On appeal, t

GALIB BIN AWAZversusMOHD. ABDUL KHADER AND ORS.

1987 INSC 13428 April 1987Dismissed

The case concerned lands originally settled by the appellant’s grandfather that were requisitioned by the military in 1963 and later acquired by the Central Government in 1970. Abdul Khader, a flower‑picker, claimed to be a protected tenant under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1

DILAWAR SINGH & ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2010 INSC 73526 October 2010Appeal(s) allowed

A large tract of land on the outskirts of Pathankot was requisitioned for defence purposes under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The owners could not agree on compensation and sought the appointment of an arbitrator, which the Government delayed for sixteen years. The arbitrator awar

UNION OF INDIAversusPARMAL SINGH & ORS.

2008 INSC 134925 November 2008Dismissed

The lands of Parmal Singh and others were requisitioned by the Central Government in 1963 under the Defence of India Act, 1962 and subsequently acquired in 1965. The Special Land Acquisition Officer fixed compensation, which the owners contested, leading to arbitration awards that included interest. The Allahabad High

UNION OF INDIAversusNIHAR KANTA SEN & ORS.

1987 INSC 12221 April 1987Case Partly allowed

During World War II the Collector requisitioned 199.04 acres of land in Burdwan, West Bengal, for a military aerodrome. The claimants, heirs of the original patni holder, sought compensation for loss of the land, forest, minerals and structures. The High Court awarded Rs.2,00,000 as terminal compensation and Rs.18,74,0

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusAJAIB SINGH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 58720 September 1995Case Allowed

The Union of India appealed against an arbitrator’s award that enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, and added solatium and interest. The competent authority had originally paid Rs 60 per Marla, which the respondents accepted without protest, a

ABHAY SINGH SURANA & ORSversusSECRETARY MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION & ORS.

1987 INSC 22019 August 1987Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Abhay Singh Surana & Ors. against the Secretary, Ministry of Communication & Ors. concerning interest on compensation awarded by an arbitrator for the requisition of premises under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The Court reiterated establis

UNION OF INDIAversusKOLLUNI RAMAIAH AND ORS.

1993 INSC 36916 November 1993

The Union of India sought to set aside an award that granted solatium (15%) and interest (6%) in a land acquisition case under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The land, requisitioned for defence, was initially compensated at Rs 10 per square yard; the Arbitrator raised it to Rs 15 an

UNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC.versusHARI KRISHAN KHOSLA (DEAD) BY LRS. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 24916 September 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a large tract of land requisitioned in 1967 under the Defence of India Act and later acquired by the Central Government under Section 7 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The compensation determined by the Competent Authority was refused to be paid, leading the own

KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusBIMAL KUMAR SHAH & ORS

2024 INSC 435416 May 2024Dismissed

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation claimed it had acquired the land of Bimal Kumar Shah under Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, which it argued gave it power to acquire land for streets and parks. The High Court held that Section 352 does not confer a power of compulsory acquisition and set asi

C.G. GHANSHAMDAS & ORS.versusCOLLECTOR OF MADRAS

1986 INSC 18912 September 1986Dismissed

The appellants owned property that had been requisitioned by the Government under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, and a compensation award of Rs.21,000 per month was fixed by an arbitrator, which the appellants contested. They appealed to the Madras High Court under section 11 of the

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusM/S. BANWARI LAL AND SONS (P) LTD.

2004 INSC 25212 April 2004Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India sought to set aside an arbitration award that granted damages to Mis. Banwari Lal & Sons for the use of a commercial property requisitioned under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The Act lapsed on 10‑Mar‑1987, after which the Court permitted the Union to remain in p

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSMT. SATYAWATI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6012 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered appeals filed by the Union of India against High Court orders directing the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 8(1)(b) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The claimants had not raised any objections to the arbitrator's award within the time prescri

SPECIAL MILITARY ESTATES OFFICERversusMUNIVENKATARAMIAH & ANOTHER

1990 INSC 210 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Special Military Estates Officer appealed two arbitrator awards concerning compensation for land requisitioned by the Union under the Defence of India Act, 1962. The land remained requisitioned beyond 10 January 1968, when the Defence Act ceased to operate and Section 25 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Imm

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusMUNSHA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 7059 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India acquired certain lands under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 and awarded compensation of Rs. 375 per kanal in 1970. The respondents filed a writ petition in 1986 seeking appointment of an arbitrator; the High Court appointed one who reduced compensation to Rs. 150 p

DRAUPADI DEVI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 5079 September 2004Dismissed

The plaintiff claimed title to a Delhi property, alleging it was his private property purchased from the Maharaja of Kapurthala, while the Union of India and others contended it was State property of Kapurthala. The Court examined the 1947 Instrument of Accession, the 1948 covenant, and subsequent correspondence, findi

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusKARAM SINGH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 3827 April 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The respondents' property was acquired under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. After the Land Acquisition Collector fixed compensation, the respondents objected and an arbitrator enhanced the award. The Single Judge set aside the arbitrator’s award and fixed a uniform enhanced compensa

RAO NARAIN SINGH (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusUNION OF INDIA

1993 INSC 1396 April 1993Case Partly allowed

The appellant's property was requisitioned under the Defence of India Act, 1962 and later acquired under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. An arbitrator fixed compensation of Rs.2,50,000 for the building and Rs.7.50 per sq. yard for the land, but the Rajasthan High Court reduced these

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusBABU SINGH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 8304 December 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India acquired about 1230.8 acres of land in Bhatinda, Punjab under Section 8 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 for defence purposes, and an arbitrator determined compensation in an award dated 19 January 1985. The landowners filed a writ petition in the Punjab & Haryana

SONAPUR TEA COMPANY PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

1994 INSC 1033 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Sonapur Tea Company owned a 1,617‑bigha tea estate in Kamrup, Assam that was requisitioned by the Union Defence Department under the Defence of India Act, 1962. After a portion was de‑requisitioned, the remaining estate was deemed requisitioned under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 (S

INDER SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 6792 November 1995Dismissed

The Land Acquisition Collector issued an award fixing compensation for three belts of land. Twenty‑two landowners, including the appellants, signed Form K under Rule 9(5)(i) of the Rules, thereby accepting the compensation without protest. Subsequently the appellants filed a writ petition in the Punjab & Haryana High C

DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICERversusSYED ABDUL SALEEM AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 812 February 2015Dismissed

The Defence Estate Officer appealed against a High Court order that increased compensation for land acquired under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 and awarded 30% solatium and 9% interest due to a 19‑year delay in appointing a statutory arbitrator. The respondents had originally been

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusDR. ASKET SINGH & ORS.

2024 INSC 4091 May 2024Dismissed

The respondents owned land that was acquired by the Central Government under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, with vesting occurring in April 1964. The Government delayed offering compensation for twelve years, and the arbitral process to determine market value took another twenty yea

ROY ESTATEversusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2009 INSC 6591 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The property known as Katras House was requisitioned in 1942 for Army purposes under Rule 75A of the Defence of India Rules, which later became a requisition under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, transferred the requisitioned building to a civil surge

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search