Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DILAWAR SINGH & ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2010 INSC 73526 October 2010Appeal(s) allowed

A large tract of land on the outskirts of Pathankot was requisitioned for defence purposes under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952. The owners could not agree on compensation and sought the appointment of an arbitrator, which the Government delayed for sixteen years. The arbitrator awar

KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusBIMAL KUMAR SHAH & ORS

2024 INSC 435416 May 2024Dismissed

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation claimed it had acquired the land of Bimal Kumar Shah under Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, which it argued gave it power to acquire land for streets and parks. The High Court held that Section 352 does not confer a power of compulsory acquisition and set asi

DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICERversusSYED ABDUL SALEEM AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 812 February 2015Dismissed

The Defence Estate Officer appealed against a High Court order that increased compensation for land acquired under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 and awarded 30% solatium and 9% interest due to a 19‑year delay in appointing a statutory arbitrator. The respondents had originally been

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusDR. ASKET SINGH & ORS.

2024 INSC 4091 May 2024Dismissed

The respondents owned land that was acquired by the Central Government under the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, with vesting occurring in April 1964. The Government delayed offering compensation for twelve years, and the arbitral process to determine market value took another twenty yea

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search