Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
498 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioners filed two writ petitions in the Bombay High Court seeking interest payable under Section 80 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State pointed out that the petitioners had already filed applications …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to compel the State to complete land acquisition proceedings and pay compensation under Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, together with interest under Section 80, for …
The petitioners, Vishwanath and Devidas Bhusare, claimed that land acquired by the State in 1979 was compensated inadequately despite an award in 1983 and a favorable reference order in 1988. The State never deposited the awarded amount, leading to accrued interest, raising the liability to …
The petitioners, owners of land in Tisgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their property, alleging that the statutory requirements under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act – notably publication in two widely‑circulated newspapers and posting of a public notice – were not complied …
The petitioners, original owners of 17 acres of land in Dhule, claimed that compensation for acquisition was delayed and sought interest under Section 80 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013. A notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued in 2013, corrected later, and the award was passed on …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State, arguing that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought to enforce an arbitral award that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 211 in Gandheli village. The award was challenged by a group of landowners under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought to acquire land for the widening of NH‑211 and, after the Competent Authority fixed compensation, the aggrieved landowners invoked Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act to refer the dispute to arbitration. The arbitrator enhanced the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑six arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, arguing that the awards were void because the arbitrators exceeded the time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought to acquire land for the widening of NH‑211 and, after the Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (CALA) fixed compensation, the aggrieved landowners invoked Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act to refer the dispute to arbitration. The …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the dismissal of its Section 34 applications challenging arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired under National Highway No. 211. The core dispute concerned whether Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the dismissal of its applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which had upheld an arbitral award increasing compensation for land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 211. The appeal raised three …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their mandate by issuing awards after the statutory time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed against a district court order that upheld an arbitral award determining compensation for land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 211 in Gandheli village. The award, issued after nearly six years, increased compensation to Rs …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of National Highway No. 211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their statutory mandate by issuing awards after the twelve‑month period prescribed in Section 29A of the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought to acquire land for the widening of NH‑211 and, after the Competent Authority fixed compensation, the landowners invoked Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act to refer the dispute to arbitration. The arbitrator enhanced the compensation and …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑four arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, arguing that the awards were void because the arbitrators exceeded the twelve‑month time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of National Highway No. 211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their statutory mandate by issuing awards after the twelve‑month period prescribed in Section 29A of the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, arguing that the awards were void because the arbitrators exceeded the time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed to apply …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning compensation for land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 211 in Gandheli village. The awards, made by arbitrators appointed under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, increased …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑six arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded the time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed to apply the valuation …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211 in Gandheli village, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded the time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed to apply the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑six arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded the twelve‑month time limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed to apply the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought arbitration under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 for compensation on land acquired for the widening of NH 211. The arbitrator enhanced the compensation from Rs 83,19,534 to Rs 1,83,70,388 per square metre. NHAI challenged the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their mandate by issuing awards after the statutory time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed against arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired under National Highway No. 211 in Gandheli village. The awards were made by arbitrators appointed under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, after the parties …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑six arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their statutory mandate and failed to apply the compensation parameters of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. …
The National Highways Authority of India filed a batch of appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Principal District Judge, Aurangabad's common judgment dated 16/10/2025 dismissing its Section 34 applications and upholding arbitral awards. Lands in …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the dismissal of its Section 34 applications challenging arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the widening of NH 211. The appeals raised three core issues: (i) whether Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation …
Petitioners Abhiman Kashinath Sanap and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra's failure to pay statutory interest on compensation awarded under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act. The core issue was whether the respondents were …
Manik Padam Aapet and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought relief concerning land acquisition matters, though the specific grievance was not detailed in the excerpt. The Court examined …
Maruti Ramrao Alange filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the inaction of the Collector, Latur, regarding his representation dated 08‑01‑2026 under Section 28‑A of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking payment of the award amount and statutory interest due under Section 80 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitioners alleged that the State of Maharashtra had failed to …
The petitioners, owners of land in Tisgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their property by the State of Maharashtra and CIDCO, alleging procedural violations under the Land Acquisition Act, including non‑compliance with the dual‑newspaper publication requirement of Section 6(2) and the …
Narottam Raghunath Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra's failure to decide his pending application under Section 21 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement …
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Sabalkhed village for a new railway line and challenged the compensation rates fixed by a Reference Court, which had enhanced the rates to Rs. 3,077 per R for Jirayat land and Rs. 4,615 per R for seasonally irrigated land. The …
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Raghapur village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs.1200 per R. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.2500 per R for Jirayat land and Rs.3000 per R for seasonally …
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Raghapur village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs.1200 per R. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.2500 per R for Jirayat land and Rs.3000 per R for seasonally …
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Ghatsawali village for a new railway line and initially offered compensation of Rs 980‑1,180 per R. Claimants challenged this award, and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs 4,064 per R and granted statutory …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award issued by the Land Acquisition Officer and the subsequent approval by the District Level Committee. Their claims centered on alleged procedural …
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Ghatsawali village for a new railway line and initially paid Rs 1,580‑1,680 per R. Claimants filed reference petitions, and the Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs 6,096 per R and granted statutory benefits under …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the role of the District Level Committee under the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. They argued that the Land Acquisition Officer’s determination of …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State. They argued that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State, arguing that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the Collector’s direction on 10 …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists, challenged the compensation award for land acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, arguing that the District Level Committee’s minutes and the Collector’s direction to re‑determine compensation were illegal and that they were entitled to a …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists, challenged the acquisition of their lands for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, contending that the compensation process violated the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. They argued that the District Level Committee approved compensation without the …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State, arguing that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the expansion of National Highway 361 in Chakur, Latur. The dispute centered on whether the arbitrator correctly applied the market‑value determination provisions of the 2013 …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained Writ Petition No. 11693 of 2026 filed by Mr Atmaram Vedu Patil seeking modification of a compensation award dated 15 June 2017 under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, …
Petitioner Kismat Kamruddin Shaikh claimed that 16 Are of his 77 Are land, acquired for National Highway No. 752, were not accounted for in the acquisition records, which showed only 61 Are. He issued a notice and filed an application for measurement, but the Public Works Department did not respond. …
The petitioners, Prameshwar Haribhau Patole and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, seeking payment of an award amount and interest that they claimed were due under Section 80 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, …
Petitioners Dilip Amarsing Rathod and another filed a writ petition challenging the handling of compensation in a land acquisition matter. The Court noted that the issues raised were already addressed in its earlier order dated 02.12.2025 in Writ Petition No. 14392 of 2025 and in the precedent Hatim …
The petitioner, a farmer, claimed that 29 R of his land acquired in 2005‑06 was done without proper notice and that no compensation had been paid, seeking compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The …
Dagdu Omkar Narwane and others filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra to acquire their land at Ganeshwadi, Hingoli and to award compensation under Section 24(1)(a) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and …
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Hausabai Babasaheb Birangal, filed civil applications seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued …
The applicants filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued that the appeals were non‑maintainable …
The applicants, heirs of the deceased Hausabai Babasaheb Birangal, filed civil applications seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued …
The petitioners filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued that the appeals were non‑maintainable …
The petitioners sought condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State argued that the appeals were non‑maintainable because they were filed beyond the …
The applicants sought condonation of a 129‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The trial court noted that the appeals were beyond the 120‑day limit and that the statute …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to pass a compensation award under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The respondent’s Attorney General argued that a Section 19 …
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Kinhi village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 1210‑1310 per R. Claimants challenged this award, and the Reference Court enhanced the rate to Rs 3500 per R and …
The appellants, owners of land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 361, challenged the arbitral awards that granted compensation of Rs 399 per square metre for lands away from the highway, while lands abutting the highway received Rs 680 per square metre. They argued that under Section …
The applicants, Ananda Dadaba Pawar and others, filed applications seeking condonation of a 97‑day delay in filing appeals under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The office note rejected the appeals as …
The appellants, owners of land acquired for the widening of National Highway No.361, challenged the arbitral awards that granted them compensation of Rs.399 per square metre, arguing that the arbitrator improperly differentiated compensation for similarly situated lands. The arbitrator had awarded …
The petitioners, Arjun Damu Gulmkar and others, filed a writ petition seeking that the State of Maharashtra initiate land acquisition proceedings and pay compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The respondent …
The petitioners, agricultural landowners, claim that their lands were acquired for the Beed‑Malsjawala‑Pimpalner‑Surdi‑Majalgaon highway in 1990 but no compensation has been paid. They filed a writ petition seeking directions for acquisition and compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation Act, …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award dated 29 September 2025 and the preceding administrative actions, alleging procedural violations, illegal involvement of the Collector and the Chief …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists, challenged the compensation award for lands acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, arguing that the District Level Committee’s minutes and a later award were illegal because they were passed without the statutory hearing required under …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State. They argued that the District Level Committee’s meeting on 9 June 2023 and the subsequent award dated 29 …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State of Maharashtra, the MSRDC and various officials. Their main grievance was that the District Level Committee …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were earmarked for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the role of the District Level Committee in the acquisition process. They argued that the Land Acquisition Officer’s determination of compensation …
The petitioners, a large group of agriculturists whose lands were acquired for the Jalna‑Nanded Super Expressway, challenged the compensation award and the procedural steps taken by the State of Maharashtra, the MSRDC and various officials. They argued that the District Level Committee’s meeting on …
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Loni Syed Mir village for a new railway line and paid rates of Rs. 860‑890 per R. The Reference Court, hearing grouped reference petitions, enhanced the compensation to Rs. 2,407 per R, treating the land as dry land and …
The Union of India, represented by the Central Railway, acquired land in Desur village for a new railway line and the Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 800‑900 per R. The Reference Court, hearing grouped reference petitions, enhanced the compensation to Rs 2,181 per R for Jirayat …
The Union of India, acting through the Central Railway, acquired land in Rajuri Navgan village for a new railway line. The Special Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 1,800‑2,250 per R, but the claimants obtained a higher rate of Rs 6,875 per R from the Reference Court. The …
The Union of India, through the Central Railway, acquired land in Ghatsawali village for a new railway line and initially awarded compensation of Rs.1180 per R. Claimants challenged this award, and the Reference Court enhanced the rate to Rs.4000 per R for Jirayat lands, also granting statutory …
The petitioner, Mallappa Irkar, sought a court order directing the State of Maharashtra and other respondents to return 8 R of land in Deoni village that he claimed was taken without proper acquisition, or alternatively to complete acquisition proceedings under the Right to Fair Compensation and …
The Communidade of Margao challenged a September 2024 order by the Competent Authority of Land Acquisition (CALA) that directed it to refund Rs.67,05,076 received as compensation under an award dated 31 October 2018 for land acquired for National Highway NH‑17 under the National Highways Act, 1956. …
The Pandharpur Municipal Council began a road‑widening project and, instead of acquiring the petitioners' land under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, offered them floor‑space index (FSI) or transfer‑of‑development‑rights (TDR) in lieu of compensation. The petitioners rejected the offer and sought …
The Pandharpur Municipal Council began a road‑widening project and, instead of acquiring the petitioners' land under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, offered them floor‑space index (FSI) or transfer‑of‑development‑rights (TDR) in lieu of compensation. The petitioners rejected the offer and sought …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, seeking relief in a land‑acquisition matter. The High Court observed that the petitioners had failed to bring on record the legal …
The petitioners, Anil Baburao Vibhute and another, filed a writ petition seeking compensation under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, alleging that earlier acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act had lapsed. Their counsel applied to withdraw the petition, stating that the pleadings were inadequate …
The petitioners sought a declaration that a 1988 land acquisition proceeding had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Right to Fair Compensation Act and demanded a fresh award and compensation with interest. The State argued that compensation had been tendered under Section 31(1) of the 1894 Land …
The petitioner, Sou. Nandiniraje Niranjan Toraskar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Satara to withdraw land allotments made from his land and a declaration that the acquisition of a portion of his land had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair …
The petitioner, Sandeepkumar Shah, challenged the Pandharpur Municipal Council's road widening project that affected his property, alleging that the council proceeded without complying with the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, …
The petitioners alleged that land (Gat No. 49, 1.63 hectares) in Mouza Khandali was taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for construction of a percolation tank without any acquisition proceeding. They sought a directive for acquisition of the land and payment of compensation with interest …
The petitioners alleged that several land parcels in Mouza Shetphal, Solapur were taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for the construction of Percolation Tank No.11 without any formal acquisition. They sought a directive for the authorities to acquire the land and pay compensation with …
The petitioners alleged that land parcels totaling 2.93 hectares in Daingadewadi village were taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for the construction of a percolation tank without any acquisition proceeding. They sought a court direction to acquire the land and pay compensation with …
The petitioners sought a declaration that the land acquisition proceeding concerning their land had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and asked for the 1988 award to be set aside and a fresh …
The petitioner, Sou. Nandiniraje Niranjan Toraskar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra to cancel land allotments made from his land and to declare that the acquisition of a portion of his land had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation …
Gandhi Autolines challenged the Pandharpur Municipal Council’s road‑widening project, alleging that the council’s offer of floor‑space index (FSI) or transfer‑of‑development‑rights (TDR) in lieu of land acquisition violated the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, …
Illuminati Buildings Solutions Pvt. Ltd. sought a writ directing the State of Maharashtra and the electricity transmission authority not to acquire its property at Gat No.20, Munguste, or to pay compensation under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The petitioner argued that the proposed transmission line …
The petitioners challenged notices issued by the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation (BNCMC) that threatened to take over their lands and structures for a road‑widening project and offered only Transferable Development Rights (TDR) instead of monetary compensation. They alleged violation of …
The petitioners, owners of lands slated for a road‑widening project by the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation (BNCMC), challenged notices that threatened to take over their properties and offered only Transferable Development Rights (TDR) instead of monetary compensation. They alleged …
The petitioners, owners of lands slated for a road‑widening project by the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation (BNCMC), challenged notices that threatened to take over their properties and offered only Transferable Development Rights (TDR) instead of monetary compensation. They alleged …
The petitioners, owners of lands slated for a road‑widening project by the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation (BNCMC), challenged notices that threatened to take over their properties and offered only Transferable Development Rights (TDR) instead of monetary compensation. They alleged …
The applicant, Smt. Shakuntla Kumari, filed a contempt application alleging that Shri Rishi Raj, Vice Chairman of Prayagraj Development Authority, and others willfully defied the High Court's order dated 11 November 2025 in Writ‑C No. 39005/2025, which directed the authority to pay compensation …
The petitioners were served notices under the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955 to remove alleged encroachments on a 12.5‑metre width of a major district road. They claimed ownership of the land and argued that any acquisition must be under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 with compensation. The respondents …
The petitioners alleged that respondents No. 7 and 8 sold a portion of land, which did not belong to them, to respondent No. 6 under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. They sought a direction to the Collector to adjudicate …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to halt construction on their private land and to compel the State to initiate land acquisition proceedings with full compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The State …
The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the railway authorities to pay compensation for land on which a railway track was constructed without formal acquisition. The State Government had issued a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 establishing a District …
The petitioners' land was acquired by the National Highways Authority of India under the National Highways Act, 1956 and a compensation award was made, but no rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) award was issued as required by the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency …
The petitioners, owners of 1721.03 sq. m of land earmarked for an 18‑metre DP road widening in Kharadi, Pune, handed over possession of the land to the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) on 9 June 2016 under a possession receipt that stipulated compensation in the form of additional FSI/TDR. After ten …
The petitioners, three agriculturists from Pune district, challenged the Maharashtra government's decision to site a new greenfield international airport at "Site 1A" in Purandar and the accompanying land acquisition of about 1,216.75 hectares under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. …
The petitioners were tenants in structures acquired by the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd (DFCCIL) for a freight corridor project. Although the Deputy Commissioner (Rehabilitation) had determined a compensation of Rs.14,17,000 for each petitioner on 06‑11‑2025, DFCCIL later …
The petitioners were tenants in structures acquired by the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd (DFCCIL) for a freight corridor project. Although the Deputy Commissioner (Rehabilitation) had determined a compensation of Rs.14,17,000 for each petitioner on 06‑11‑2025, DFCCIL later …
The petitioners were tenants in structures acquired by the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd (DFCCIL) for a freight corridor project. Although the Deputy Commissioner (Rehabilitation) had determined a compensation of Rs.14,17,000 for each petitioner on 06‑11‑2025, DFCCIL later …
The petitioners were tenants in structures acquired by the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd (DFCCIL) for a freight corridor project. Although the Deputy Commissioner (Rehabilitation) had determined a compensation of Rs.14,17,000 for each petitioner on 06‑11‑2025, DFCCIL later …
The petitioners were tenants in structures acquired by the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd (DFCCIL) for a freight corridor project. Although the Deputy Commissioner (Rehabilitation) had determined a compensation of Rs.14,17,000 for each petitioner on 06‑11‑2025, DFCCIL later …
The petitioner, M/s Jasa Lumbaji & Co., challenged orders dated 04.12.2025 and 05.12.2025 by the Tahsildar, Thane, which deleted its name from the "other rights" column of the revenue record following a request from the Ministry of Defence. The petition sought directions for compensation under the …
The petitioners' land was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) and they received compensation, but no rehabilitation and resettlement award under the Second Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, …
The petitioners challenged a notification dated 15 September 2025 issued under Section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, alleging that the proposed acquisition for a service road around a canal was unnecessary. They …
The petitioner, Raghunath, sold a parcel of land to respondent No.3 under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, intending to transfer only 0.0426 hectare. He alleges that an additional 0.0970 hectare was taken without his …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking mandamus to compel the State authorities to consider their pending land acquisition grievance applications, conduct fresh joint measurement of their land, reassess and pay fair compensation, and restrain demolition of their residence. The State argued …
The petitioner, Hansraji, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to investigate alleged illegal construction of a road (Rasta) on his land, to hear his objections, and to provide compensation if the land was acquired unlawfully. He also requested expedited consideration of his …
The petitioners own land in Thane that the Thane Municipal Corporation intends to use for a Development Plan Road. The corporation offered compensation in the form of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) / Floor Space Index (FSI) instead of monetary payment, citing lack of financial capacity. The …
The petitioners sought payment of compensation awarded on 27‑04‑2026 following a land acquisition, which the respondents had withheld citing a revenue record indicating non‑agricultural use of the land and a potential penalty under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The …
The petitioners alleged that their land was used by the municipal corporation for road construction between 2014 and 2016 without any acquisition proceeding or compensation. The corporation claimed it had deposited Rs 7.01 crore with the Special Land Acquisition Officer for compensation of all …
The petitioner, Sindhubai Baliram Chavan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra to correct revenue records for her land in Raigad, alleging that acquisition proceedings from 1964 had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act and Section 11A of …
The petitioners, owners of 6,900 sq m of land in Bhayander, claimed that the State and MTNL had possessed the land since 1989 without paying compensation or completing acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. Parallel …
The petitioners, owners of 6,900 sq m of land in Bhayander, claimed that the State and MTNL had possessed the land since 1989 without paying compensation or completing acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. Parallel …
Vijay Narayan Ram filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and Prayagraj Development Authority to pay fair compensation with interest under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for 303 sq. yd. …
The appellant, Santraj Singh, filed an appeal under Section 74 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, challenging an order dated 24.03.2026. The Registry objected, stating that a Section 74 appeal can be filed only against …
The petitioners in five writ petitions sought additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces that were acquired for the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway, alleging that the agreements executed under Section 19‑B(2) of the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955 paid compensation …
Petitioner Baban Tukaram Khade filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the acquisition of his 1.07‑hectare land in Gat No. 76, Pune, had lapsed under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and that the …
The Bombay High Court considered five writ petitions filed by original land owners, power‑of‑attorney holders and assignees seeking additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces under the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway project. The lands had been acquired by …
The Bombay High Court considered five writ petitions filed by original land owners, power‑of‑attorney holders and assignees seeking additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces under the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway project. The lands had been acquired by …
The petitioners filed five writ petitions seeking additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces that were acquired for the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway. The lands had been converted to non‑agricultural use and acquired under the Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955, …
The Bombay High Court considered five writ petitions filed by original land owners, power‑of‑attorney holders and assignees seeking additional compensation for portions of land reserved for internal roads and open spaces under the Nagpur‑Mumbai Highway project. The lands had been acquired by …
The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition filed by Apurva Co‑Operative Housing Society and others seeking compensation for eight members who had not yet received alternative accommodation after a municipal acquisition. The Municipal Corporation proposed either a Transfer of Development Rights …
The petitioner claimed that the State, through the Public Works Department, took possession of his land in 2010 for a road‑widening project and, despite issuing notices in 2011 and 2013, failed to pay any compensation. He invoked Article 300A of the Constitution and sought acquisition, computation …
The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Kukadi Dam Project, obtained a land acquisition award on 31 May 1999 but have not received any compensation despite possession being taken. They contend that, under the proviso to Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in …
The petitioners, comprising leaseholders and owners of land and structures occupied by a flyover and road project in Mumbai, challenged the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's (MCGM) calculation of compensation under Sections 298‑301 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act (MMC Act). They …
The petitioners challenged a land acquisition proceeding initiated in 1961, claiming it had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and sought a declaration that their land (Plot no 614, Khata No. …
The petitioner, Gopal Prasad Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus, compensation, quashing of a 2011 acquisition notification, and release of his land alleged to have been acquired for a police line under the urgency clause of the Bihar Amendment to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. He …
The petitioner, Kamdev Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to refer his case to the competent court for enhancement of compensation under Section 64 of the RFCTLARRA, 2013, invoking the precedent set in Kumar Ohm v. State of Bihar (CWJC No. 2743 of 2023). The …
Mukesh Kumar Sharma filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to set aside a notice issued under Section 11(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and to compel the State authorities to comply with Sections 4‑8 of the …
The petitioner, Azad Kumar, challenged the acquisition of his residential land for the Islampur Bypass road, seeking a modification of the alignment to avoid demolition of his house and demanding full compensation and rehabilitation under the 2013 land acquisition law. The State argued that an award …
The petitioner, Hareshwar Prasad Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the National Highways Authority of India and related government officials to re‑determine the compensation award under Section 28A of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, …
The petitioners, a group of land owners in Patna district, challenged the acquisition of their lands for the Mukhyamantri Gramin Sadak Yojana, seeking to quash the notice published on 09.05.2023 and the awards under Section 37(2) of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, and to restrain possession. They alleged …
Petitioner Bigu Paswan filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his claim under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 be referred to the appropriate authority for settlement. The Court noted a prior order in …
The petitioners, Sheela Devi and Raju Kumar, heirs of the late Devendra Singh, filed a writ petition against the State of Bihar, its land‑acquisition authorities and a joint‑venture railway company, seeking relief under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land …
The petitioner, Laxman Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that his claim under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 be referred to the appropriate authority for settlement. The respondents, …
Petitioners Kameswar Ram and Surendra Ram filed a writ petition seeking a direction under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 to have their land‑acquisition claims referred to the appropriate authority. The …
Jagadambi Chaudhari's land was acquired for an Indane gas pipeline but he received no compensation. He filed a writ petition seeking payment, which was earlier directed to the District Magistrate who in turn referred the matter to the competent authority, IOCL Barauni. The Court held that the …
The petitioners, a group of landowners from Hasanpura village, filed a writ petition seeking higher compensation for land acquired for National Highway 30, alleging that the compensation awarded was substantially lower than that paid to adjoining landowners and that the valuation was improper. The …
Subhanti Devi challenged the acquisition of her 210 sq. m. land, alleging that she was not served notice under Section 5A and that the land, which she claims is of commercial value, was treated as agricultural, resulting in inadequate compensation. She sought to set aside the award dated 02‑09‑2021 …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for 6.8 decimal of his residential land that was used to construct an approach road for a bridge over the …
The petitioner, a practising advocate, filed a writ petition challenging the approval, tariff, and land lease arrangements for the Pirpainti Thermal Power Project awarded to Adani Power Ltd. under a design‑build‑finance‑own‑operate model. He alleged that the tariff of ₹6.075/kWh was arbitrary, the …
The petitioners, five landowners, sought compensation for land acquired by the State in 1957-58 for the construction of Raxaul Airport, alleging they never received the award copy and thus could not claim compensation. They filed a writ petition claiming the State should direct payment of …
The petitioner, Abdhesh Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking to quash the Collector's order dated 27‑09‑2025 which rejected his claim for compensation on a commercial basis for a piece of land. The petition did not include any documents to substantiate the commercial value of the land. The …
The petitioners sought to quash a 2026 order of the District Land Acquisition Officer that allegedly revived a 2002 land acquisition proceeding and to restrain the State from dispossessing their ancestral homes. They argued that no compensation had been paid and that the acquisition had lapsed under …
Petitioners Gajadhar Prasad and Sanjay Sharma filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking a court‑directed expedited award of compensation for commercial land acquired for a double‑decker flyover, a re‑classification of the land’s ward rate from residential to commercial, and an interim …
The petitioners, a trust, sought relief in a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The State, as respondent No.6, filed a reply affidavit stating that, in light of the Court’s order dated 21‑04‑2017 and the Supreme Court’s decision in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal (S.L.P. (C) …
The petitioners challenged the acquisition of land for the widening of a National Highway. They later submitted a letter offering a settlement to the Collector, which the Collector accepted, proposing to dispose of the writ petition on those terms. Both parties filed affidavits confirming the …
Satender Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to refer his case to the competent court for enhancement of compensation under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The …
The petitioner, Parshuram Singh, challenged the land acquisition process for the Patna Metro Rail project, seeking to quash the acquisition notification, the Social Impact Assessment (SIA) report, the expert committee report, the rejection order of his objection, and the compensation award, alleging …
The petitioners, three private landowners, challenged a notice issued under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for the acquisition of their land for a four‑lane road project, arguing that the land had already been acquired …
The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the matter be referred to a competent court for enhancement of compensation under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, invoking …
The petitioner, Mantu Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to refer his land acquisition case (No. 14/11-12) to the competent court for enhancement of compensation, invoking parity with earlier judgments. The petition relied on the order in Kumar Ohm v. …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, owns three agricultural plots in Village Kudwa, Kanpur Nagar, and alleges that the State of Uttar Pradesh and other authorities are constructing and extending the Damar Asphalt Road over his land without acquiring it or paying compensation under the Right to Fair …
Petitioner Prahlad Sharma filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the State of Uttar Pradesh and others not interfere with his peaceful possession of land (Khasra No. 682) and not undertake any construction without due process, also claiming damages under the Right to Fair Compensation and …
The petitioner, Ram Chandra Kushwaha, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nagar Nigam Prayagraj/Prayagraj Development Authority to pay compensation for land acquired in Arazi No.840 (0.491 hectare). The State counsel highlighted a Government Order dated 12‑05‑2016 which mandates …
The petitioner, Smt Sushma Katiyar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay compensation for her land acquisition based on the current residential circle rate fixed by the District Magistrate. The State of U.P. and other respondents objected, arguing that the …
Petitioner Puneet Kumar Vishwakarma filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and other respondents to pay compensation for his land acquisition based on the current residential circle rate fixed by the District Magistrate. The State, through its standing counsel, objected that …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State to release two plots of land allotted for an OPEC Hospital or, alternatively, to acquire the land under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013 with …
Hazrat Ali filed a writ petition seeking that the authorities dispose of his representation dated 14‑12‑2020 and enhance the award amounts (Award Nos. 56 and 62) under L.A. Case No. 31/2016‑17, with statutory interest, and that the computation follow the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency …
Shiv Shankar Jha filed a writ petition seeking proper compensation for his 2‑decimal land acquired for National Highway 527E. He alleged that the respondents paid him only Rs. 8,00,000 based on an outdated rate, contrary to the requirement under Section 37(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and …
Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Singh filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking a writ to restrain the Union of India, the State of Bihar, NHAI and other authorities from taking possession of his land and to compel payment of full compensation, 100% solatium and interest under the Right to Fair …
The petitioner, Arvind Kumar Yadav, claimed ownership of a 7‑bigha plot in Madhepura district, which he purchased in 1965 and for which a title appeal (No.01/1998) was decided in his favour. The State of Bihar had utilized the land for public infrastructure such as a road, drainage, flood shelter, …
The petitioners, land owners, challenged the award dated 30.05.2020 which granted only the base market value (multiplication factor I) and omitted the additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement …
The petitioners, co‑owners of land acquired for a national highway, challenged the award dated 01‑06‑2020 for failing to grant the additional compensation of 12% under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (the …
The petitioners sought the benefit of additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, calculated on the market value that includes the multiplication factor‑2 under Section 26(2). The Court …
The petitioners, owners of land acquired under the National Highways Act, challenged an award dated 30.05.2020 which had determined market value using the multiplication factor‑2 under Section 26(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and …
The Bombay High Court initiated suo motu proceedings pursuant to the Supreme Court's direction in Yash Developers v. Harihar Krupa Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. to conduct a performance audit of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. The Court heard the …
The petitioners, owners of land acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956, challenged an award dated 08.01.2020 that computed market value using the multiplication factor 2 under Section 26(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and …
The petitioners challenged an award dated 28‑09‑2020 in which the market value of land acquired under the National Highways Act was computed using the multiplication factor 2 under Section 26(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement …
The legal heirs of the late Gohil Bhagavandas sought the benefit of Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, i.e., an additional 12% compensation on the market value of land that had been determined using the …
Petitioners Dev Singh and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents to grant them compensation and benefits recommended by the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee in its report dated 03‑03‑2023 under the Right to Fair …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking compensation for land acquired by the Union of India in Ghazipur district. They claimed that the respondents had not paid adequate compensation for Arazi No. 34 and 12. The respondents pointed to a Government Order dated 12 May 2016, which mandates that …
The petitioner, Surya Nath Ram, filed a public interest litigation challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others, alleging violation of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The Court observed that the petitioner’s own …
The petitioners challenged an award dated 28‑09‑2020 for land acquired under the National Highways Act, alleging that the award failed to grant the 12% additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement …
The petitioners, land owners affected by a National Highways acquisition, claimed they were denied the additional compensation of 12% per annum under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, calculated on the …
The petitioners, a large group of land owners, challenged the award dated 30.01.2020 for failing to grant them the 12% additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR Act) on the …
The applicant, Alimun Nisha, filed a contempt application after the High Court, in Writ‑C No. 26542 of 2025, ordered that no demolition of her property could occur unless the procedure under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, …
The High Court disposed a civil contempt application filed by Kamran Ahmad against the District Magistrate and others. The application arose from a prior writ petition (Writ‑C No. 26542 of 2025) in which the Court had ordered that no demolition of the petitioners' constructions could occur except in …
The applicant, Javed Iqbal, filed a contempt application against the District Magistrate of Varanasi and four others, alleging that they were threatening to force demolition of his properties and coercing him to sign agreements for land acquisition without following the procedures of the Right to …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Basti to decide a representation they had filed on 22 May 2025 concerning compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. …
The petitioners, Kailash and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India and other respondents to pay additional compensation for a parcel of land (Gata No. 756, 0.1180 hectare) in Ghazipur district and to decide a representation filed on 09‑09‑2025. The …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State and two authorities to pay compensation for land allegedly encroached by the National Highway Authority of India and to restrain the release of compensation to other beneficiaries. The State counsel highlighted a Government Order dated …
The petitioners, co‑owners of land acquired in Siddharthnagar, filed a writ seeking a mandamus directing the State to complete the acquisition process and release fair‑market compensation, alleging they were excluded from compensation granted to the other co‑sharer. The petitioners relied on a 2016 …
Surendra Singh challenged the acquisition of his 0.045 hectare land in Kishunpura, Saran, by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) for the Ram Janki Path project. He alleged that the acquisition order and the arbitration award violated Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and …
The petitioners challenged an award dated 08.01.2020 under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, which had applied the multiplication factor 2 under Section 26(2) to determine market value but had granted the additional …
The petitioners, a large group of land owners, challenged the award dated 15‑01‑2020 which computed the market value of their land using the multiplication factor 2 under Section 26(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, …
The petitioners, a group of land owners, challenged the award dated 28‑09‑2020 for land acquired under the National Highways Act, alleging that the additional compensation of 12% per annum under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and …
The petitioners challenged an award dated 15‑01‑2020 under the National Highways Act, 1956, which had computed the market value of their land using the multiplication factor 2 prescribed in Section 26(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and …
The petitioners, a group of land owners, challenged the award dated 08.01.2020 for failing to grant the 12% additional compensation under Section 30(3) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR Act) on the market value …
The petitioners, legal heirs of the late Gohil, challenged an award dated 08‑01‑2020 that computed the market value of land acquired under the National Highways Act using the multiplication factor 2 under Section 26(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, …
The petitioner, Fakirchand Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the District Magistrate‑Collector of Aurangabad refer his land‑acquisition matter to the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARRA), Gaya under Section 64(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation …
