Patna High Court
Md. JalalversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Jalal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the POCSO Act, based on an allegation by an informant that he kidnapped her minor daughter for marriage. The petitioner contended he has a clean record and that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S. did not support the prosecution, instead accusing her father of sexual abuse and alleging the informant filed a false case under pressure. The State opposed bail but could not refute the victim’s statement. The court examined the credibility of the victim’s statement, the possibility of a false complaint, and the provisions of Section 482(2) B.N.S. for granting bail. It ordered that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, subject to a bond of Rs.5,000 and two sureties, and the conditions laid down under Section 482(2).
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances.
- Whether the victim’s statement under Section 183 B.N.S. negates the prosecution’s case.
- Whether the allegations constitute a false case warranting bail under Section 482(2) B.N.S.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S., 2023 — s. 115(2), 126(2), 137(2), 183, 3(5), 352, 482(2), 74, 96
- POCSO Act — s. 4(1)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- false complaint
- victim statement
- POCSO Act
- Section 183
- Section 482
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71119 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2024 Thana- HASANGANJ District- Katihar
======================================================
Md. Jalal S/O Md. Ishak R/O Village- Islampur Purab Dherwa, P.S.-
Hasanganj, District- Katihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. ABC W/O XYZ R/O Village- Islampur Bandewar, P.S.- Hasanganj, District-
Katihar (Informant)
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsingh Tanti
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 15-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2),
115(2), 74, 352, 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and
Section 4(1) of POCSO Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant
alleges that petitioner enticed and kidnapped her minor daughter
for the purposes of marriage.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71119 of 2025(3) dt.15-04-2026
2/3
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
informant. It is next submitted that the victim came back and her
statement was recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein she
has not supported the case of the prosecution rather has stated
that her father used to rape her and forced her to indulge in
prostitution, the victim has also disclosed that her father forced
her mother and sister even to indulge in prostitution, further
that it was her father who had sent the victim to the petitioner
and when the victim met the petitioner, she requested him to
marry her, thereafter they went to Haryana and performed their
court marriage and when the victim came to know about the
instant case she came back and gave her statement before the
police and thereafter her statement was also recorded under
Section 183 BNSS.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
informant under pressure of her husband has instituted the
instant false case and after the statement of the victim was
recorded under Section 183 BNSS, thereafter again the instant
informant has instituted a separate criminal case against the
petitioner.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71119 of 2025(3) dt.15-04-2026
3/3
anticipatory bail of the petitioner but then are not in a position to
rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner that the victim in her statement recorded under
Section 183 BNSS has not supported the case of the
prosecution.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail
bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court
where the case is pending/successor court in connection with
Hasanganj P.S. Case No.103/2024 (District-Katihar), subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.