Patna High Court
Dharmendra Sah @ Dharmendra ShahversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioners subject to the conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Summary
The petitioners, Dharmendra Sah and Pawan Sah, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 281 of 2025) where they were accused under Sections 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant. They contended that they were falsely implicated due to a family dispute involving dowry and that the specific knife‑assault allegation pertained to another co‑accused, Ravi Kumar Sah. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the charges. The court examined the facts, noting the petitioners' claim of innocence, lack of prior criminal record, and their willingness to cooperate with the investigation. Considering these circumstances, the court ordered that the petitioners be released on bail upon surrender within six weeks, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners accused under Sections 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
- Whether the petitioners pose a risk of fleeing, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482(2)
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 109, 118(1), 303(2), 3(5)
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- assault
- dowry dispute
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- Section 482
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79455 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas
======================================================
1. Dharmendra Sah @ Dharmendra Shah Son of Dhaneshwar Sah Village-
Akorhi PS- Akorhi Gola District- Rohtas
2. Pawan Sah @ Chhotu Kumar son of Dhaneshwar Sah Village- Akorhi PS-
Akorhi Gola District- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
2 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case
registered under Sections 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons
including the petitioners assaulted the informant due to which
he sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the
present case due to ulterior motive. Further submission is that
petitioners are brothers-in-law of the informant. The informant,
who is husband of the petitioners’ sister, used to assault and
torture his wife for dowry and to make pressure, the present case
has been lodged against the petitioners. Learned counsel further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79455 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026
2/2
submits that specific allegation of assault by knife is on the co-
accused Ravi Kumar Sah. Allegations against the petitioners are
general in nature. Petitioners were not present at the place of
occurrence. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They
undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State
opposed the bail application.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances
of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties,
let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event
of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a
period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and
Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection
with Dinara P.S. Case No. 281 of 2025, subject to the conditions
as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-
U T
Checking your session…