Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sheo Kumar @ Shiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Sheo Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting an informant with a knife, resulting in a cut nose. He contends that the injury was caused when the informant fell on a sharp iron gate during a monetary dispute, not by a knife, and asserts that he has no prior criminal record. The petitioner applied for bail, arguing false implication and willingness to cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the bail application. After considering the facts and the petitioner's claim that the injury was not life‑threatening, the court granted bail subject to a bond and sureties under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • injury

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87406 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1089 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Sheo Kumar @ Shiv Kumar Son of Doman Yadav R/o Village - Irki, P.S. -
                 Jahanabad, P.S. - Jehanabad.
                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                              ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-01-2026                           Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                     2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352,

                   351(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                   3.     As per the F.I.R., the petitioner and 3-4

                   unknown persons abused and assaulted the informant and his

                   brother. Allegation against the petitioner is that he inflicted knife

                   blow upon the informant due to which his nose was cut.

                                   4.    Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely

                   been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive.

                   Further submission is that petitioner and informant are cousin

                   brothers. As a matter of fact, some money of the petitioner was

                   due upon the informant and when petitioner demanded his due

                   money, some altercation took place between them near the gate

                   of government school and in altercation, informant fell down on
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87406 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      the sharp edge iron gate of the school due to which, he sustained

                      injury on his nose. Although, it is stated that the injury caused to

                      informant is grievous in nature but the same is not dangerous to

                      life. The injury report shows that the said injury caused by hard

                      blunt object and a sharp blunt object and it is not by the knife as

                      alleged. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he

                      undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

                                    5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for

                      bail.

                                     6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

                      the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let

                      the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of

                      arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a

                      period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of

                      Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

                      Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case

                      No. 1089 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                      Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.



                                              (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.