Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 14001–14200

MAHENDRA ASHOK SHINGARE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed

The petitioners, directors of Nasik Krushi Vikas Producer Company, were accused of forging the complainant's signature to obtain loans from two NBFCs, but the loans were fully repaid and a settlement deed was executed by all parties. The complainant consented to quash the FIR dated 20-11-2025 under …

SAHAJRAM RAMDHAR CHOUHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered the bail application of Sahajram Ramdhar Chouhan, accused of murder under Section 302 IPC for a stabbing that occurred on 13 October 2021 in Bhiwandi. The prosecution’s case relied on circumstantial evidence, including blood‑stained clothing and a knife, while an …

MOHD. UMAR MOHD. SULEMAN AND ORS.versusANJUMAN TAHEZEEBUL AKHLAQUE AND ORS.

Dismissed

The petitioners, three of the original plaintiffs, filed a writ petition challenging a district court's refusal to allow them to withdraw an amount deposited by the defendants pending the final hearing of the suit. The trial court had permitted the defendants to deposit the arrears of rent under …

SMT. CHITRALEKHA SUBHASH KHARPUDE AND ANRversusSHRI RAMDAS BABAN WAVHAL

Disposed Off

The appellants (defendants) appealed against a decree cancelling a 2008 Agreement for Sale, which the trial court had upheld on the ground that they failed to pay the balance consideration of Rs.4,50,000. The appellants argued that the plaintiffs (respondents) had breached reciprocal obligations by …

AADITY RAMDAS PINGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Aditya Ramdas Pingale, sought bail in three separate criminal matters arising from FIRs registered at different police stations, involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act. The prosecution alleged his participation in threats, …

SAMAR BAHADUR SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mr. Samar Bahadur Singh, filed a criminal bail application before the High Court of Bombay. He later sought leave to withdraw that application and requested liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court on new grounds. The learned counsel, Mr. Mushtaq Shaikh, …

KUNDAN AILDAS THADANIversusASHOK AILDAS THADANI AND ANR

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

The petitioner, Kundan Aildas Thadani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled hearing date. A related civil application for recording the petitioner's heirs remains pending. The Court …

GANESH BHAUSAHEB KALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Ganesh Bhausaheb Kale, accused No.10 in a case involving murder, conspiracy, extortion and organised crime offences, had been in custody for over five years and six months. He sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing that his prolonged detention violated his …

MANILAL MOHANLAL KARACHIWALAversusMESSRS MANILAL KILABHAI and CO. AND ANR.

Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Manilal Mohanlal Karachiwala filed a civil revision application before the High Court of Bombay. The application had been adjourned twice at the request of the applicant's counsel as a last chance to present the case. On the scheduled date, no representative of the applicant appeared before the …

VINAYKUMAR NARAYAN DESHPANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Vinaykumar Narayan Deshpande, a senior citizen, filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and to pursue a private criminal complaint (RCC No.5311 of 2022) pending before the 6th Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Pune. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the court grant …

ASHISH SHIVAJI LANDAGEversusSAKSHI ASHISH LANDAGE

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Vaishali Anil, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the respondent, Tikam, concerning arrears of maintenance. The High Court had previously ordered the petitioner to deposit the maintenance arrears. The petitioner failed to comply with this order. The court, noting the …

HARAN KALYAN CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Rejected

The applicant, Haran Kalyan Chavan, was implicated as the driver in a dacoity and theft that occurred at a village fair on 20 April 2025, where several gold ornaments were stolen. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, claiming he was …

KIRAN DHARMENDRA SONIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Kiran Dharmendra Soni, filed a criminal bail application before the High Court of Bombay. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Jaikumar Vohra, sought leave to withdraw the bail application, citing a change in circumstances and requesting liberty to file a fresh bail application …

PRATIK MICHAEL TRIBHUVANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

Pratik Michael Tribhuvan filed a criminal application seeking quash of the FIR against him. No counsel appeared for the applicant when the matter was called. The respondent's counsel informed the court that a charge‑sheet had already been filed in the case. The court held that once a charge‑sheet is …

SANDAWELLBEING PVT LTD THROUGH AJIT RAMANLAL PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Sandawellbeing Pvt Ltd, the first informant, filed a criminal writ petition seeking the High Court to direct the Metropolitan Magistrate's 32nd Court at Bandra to conclude proceedings in case number 1759/PW/2018 and decide a discharge application filed by the accused in 2019. The petitioner argued …

PRAMOD BHARAT GANGURDEversusARCHANA PRAMOD GANGURDE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The High Court of Bombay heard Criminal Revision Application No. 431 of 2019 filed by Vaishali Anil Tikam and Pramod Bharat Gangurde against Archana Pramod Gangurde and others. The applicants were represented by Mr. Akshay Pawar with counsel Vasim Siddiqui and Faiz Ali Khan, while the respondents …

NARAYAN KISAN BAITADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicants, Narayan Kisan Baitade and another, filed a criminal application seeking leave of the High Court to withdraw their pending petition and to be permitted to file a separate application for discharge. The learned counsel for the applicants argued for the withdrawal. The Court considered …

ADITYA RAMDAS PINGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Aditya Ramdas Pingale, sought bail in three separate criminal matters arising from FIRs numbered 78, 33 and 28 of 2026, involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act. The prosecution alleged his participation in threats, intimidation …

DEEPAK BHAUSAHEB CHOTHE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicants, Deepak Bhausaheb Chothe and others, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra opposed the application. During the hearing, the counsel for the applicants, Mr. Mahesh Pawar (appearing on behalf of Mr. Mihir Kasliwal), and the Assistant Public …

ADITYA RAMDAS PINGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered three bail applications filed by Aadity Ramdas Pingale under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, relating to three separate FIRs (Nos. 78, 33 and 28 of 2026) involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Maharashtra Police …

Asif Dawood PatelversusState of Maharashtra,

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the mutation of their lands to ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The High Court, recalling its earlier directions in Writ Petition No.1536 of 2017 and Writ Petition No.5344/2026, ordered that the petitioners be allowed to …

VIVEK MADANLAL JAINversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Vivek Madanlal Jain, filed a writ petition alleging that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (CC No. 4253/SS/2008) pending before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 47th Court, Mumbai, had been delayed for about 26 years despite a 2014 order …

Shobha Neelkamal TejwaniversusSUBHASHISH DEVELOPERS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shobha Neelkamal Tejwani, filed a review petition challenging the order dated 10 June 2026 passed by this Court in Second Appeal No. 238 of 2026 against Subhashish Developers. The petition sought relief on the ground that the earlier order contained an apparent error or other …

Mr Suresh Bhalchandra MalekarversusThe Municipal Commissioner

Disposed Off

Petitioner Suresh Bhalchandra Malekar filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari or mandamus directing the Municipal Commissioner and Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation to produce records of alleged unauthorized construction of three shops and to order their demolition, relying …

Mrs Puja Santosh ChapchadiversusSantosh Shrimant Chapchadi

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Swapnil Puja Santosh Chapchadi, filed a miscellaneous civil application and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel, Ganesh Pol, made the request on behalf of the applicant. The court considered whether leave to withdraw could be granted. It granted the …

HANUMANT BAPURAO YELE ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicants filed a criminal application after a chargesheet was lodged against them, seeking the court's permission to withdraw the present proceedings. They requested liberty to initiate fresh proceedings after annexing the chargesheet and making the necessary averments. The sole issue before …

SURAJ SHANKARRAO NEVSE AND ANR.versusIQBAL ABBAS BAGWAN AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The appellants challenged a decree confirming a trial court judgment that upheld sale deeds dated 18 June 1986, which transferred ancestral property allegedly under legal necessity. The trial court had held the suit barred by limitation and that the property was not ancestral; the first appellate …

VINAYAK DNYANESHWAR MARATHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Vinayak Dnyaneshwar Marathe, was arrested in connection with a large‑scale investment fraud alleged under the MPID Act, the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act and several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The complainant claimed that Marathe, as a director and …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusMR ANURAG AWASTHI

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging an order that directed the police to hand over interim custody of seized Gutkha (Vimal Pan Masala and Vimal Tobacco) to the accused after he executed a bond. The State argued that the goods were sold in Pune, violating the state’s ban on …

SANDEEP ASHOK BARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Sandeep Ashok Bari, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. While the application was pending, the applicant was arrested on 3 September 2026, as confirmed by the investigating officer. Both the applicant's counsel and the State's counsel acknowledged the …

PREETI A. KUMAR @ PATHAKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Preeti A. Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application but later informed the court that a charge-sheet had been filed against her. She sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and requested liberty to file any appropriate application before the competent …

YOGESH PARASRAM BASEREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Yogesh Parasram Basere, filed an interim application in a criminal appeal and later sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant requested that the application not be entertained on its merits and asked for withdrawal. The Court, after expressing …

KAMAL CHANDRA TIWARIversusUNIVERSITY GRANT COMMISSION UGC THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Kamal Chandra Tiwari, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the University Grants Commission. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Jagdish Aradwad Reddy, later submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The respondents, represented by Mr. Jainendra …

NEEDA W/O REHAN KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Needa, filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of investigation in Crime No. 1377 of 2024, alleging that the police failed to record her statement, which she claims constitutes the FIR. The petition was filed after the charge-sheet had already been filed on 27 May 2025, and …

KASHINATH PANDURANG JADHAVversusPRITHI PAUL SINGH SETHI AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Kashinath Pandurang Jadhav, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. No counsel or party appeared on the first scheduled date, leading the court to adjourn the matter. The same situation recurred on the second date with no appearance by any party. As a result, the court …

Uttam Valji BhushanversusMrs Menal Dhrumil Patel

Disposed Off

The applicant, who was 17 years and 8 months old at the time of a fatal road accident caused by reckless driving and stunt activities, had been granted bail by the Juvenile Justice Board. The Additional Sessions Judge cancelled that bail, invoking the exception under Section 12 of the Juvenile …

VIVEK ATMARAM KELUSKAR AND ANRversusRASHMI RAJESH SAWARDEKAR AND ANR

Dismissed

The petitioners sought to quash FIR No. I-159 of 2016 alleging an offence under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition was filed after the charge‑sheet had been filed, charges were framed and the trial had commenced. The petitioners were not present when the matter …

Pravin Harkishan MalkaniversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicant, Pravin Harkishan Malkani, filed a criminal application under Section 438 of the CrPC seeking relaxation of a condition that required him to attend the police station every two months, a condition imposed by a Special Judge under the POCSO Act in 2022. The FIR was lodged in 2018, the …

SMT. SEEMA RAMDAS GAWADEversusSHRI SOMNATH RAMDAS GAWADE

Dismissed

The applicant filed a miscellaneous civil application under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking transfer of a suit for injunction filed by the respondents in Pune to the court at Thane, arguing convenience because both suits relate to the same property. The applicant’s own suit for …

KAMINI KISHOR SHINDEversusSULOCHANA RAMESH SHINDE

Disposed Off

The appellant, Kamini Kishor Shinde, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a three‑day delay in filing a second appeal under the Stamp Act. The respondent, Sulochana Ramesh Shinde, did not oppose the application. The court examined the reasons for the delay and considered the short …

AKSHAY RAMBHAU INGOLE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicants, Akshay Rambhau Ingole and others, filed Criminal Application No.1515 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court. After filing, further evidence emerged and charges were framed against them. The applicants then sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the present application and to file a …

KHAN MAHENOOR SOHAILRAZAversusNATIONAL TESTING AGENCY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Khan Mahenoor Sohailraza, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the National Testing Agency and other respondents. The petitioner later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition. The primary issue before the Court was …

SURESH KALYA DHODADE AND ORSversusPARVEZ SHAPUR IRANI AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought a writ directing the release of 60% of compensation amounts deposited in a civil suit concerning land acquired for the NHAI, claiming entitlement as tenants. The court noted that the petitioners had previously filed an interim application in the already disposed Writ Petition …

NITIN RAJENDRA KUSEKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nitin Rajendra Kusekar, who was arrested for assault causing grievous hurt under Section 307 of the IPC. The incident arose from a verbal altercation at a paan shop, …

HARISH BHIM SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Harish Bhim Singh, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 287, 303(2) and 62 of the same Act and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The prosecution alleged that a large …

CHEMBUR KARNATAKA SANGHA THR ITS REPORTING TRUSTEEversusRANJANKUMAR R AMIN

Disposed Off

The petition under Article 227 challenged the Joint Charity Commissioner’s order rejecting a revision of the Assistant Charity Commissioner’s decision that allowed a former managing committee member and secretary of the Chembur Karnataka Sangha trust to intervene in a Change Report under Section 73A …

SANTOSH SHIVAJI SALGARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed as Withdrawn

Santosh Shivaji Salgar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested to withdraw the application, indicating that the court was not inclined to grant bail. The court entertained the request and allowed the withdrawal of …

VICKY MANOHAR LADGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Vicky Manohar Ladge, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he merely purchased a plot of land and was not involved in the alleged forgery and fraud. The prosecution alleged that the sale deed was …

NITIN VASANT JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Nitin Vasant Jadhav, who is charged with causing a fatal road accident under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Motor Vehicles Act, …

GANESH DNYANESHWAR SATAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Ganesh Dnyaneshwar Satav applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a charge of possessing 132 Mephentermine Sulphate injections alleged to have been kept for him by a gym trainer friend. The prosecution’s case relied solely on …

GANESH DATTATRAY PINGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Ganesh Dattatray Pingale, who is accused of causing grievous hurt to a relative during a land dispute. The FIR alleges that the applicant entered the victim’s agricultural field, a …

LAHU SAKHARAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Vaishali Anil Tikam, was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate and the conviction was confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 294, 509 and 354-A of the Indian Penal Code, attracting short-term imprisonment and fines. While on bail during the trial, …

ABDUL QADIR SHAH, @ ABDUL QADIR GULAM RASOOL SHAHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Abdul Qadir Shah under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 475/2026 alleging offences under Sections 64(1), 69, 123 and 318(4) of the same Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had …

TUSHAR SANJAY KHAREversusTHE SATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Tushar Sanjay Khare, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The court expressed its disinclination to entertain the application. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Amit Pradhan, persuaded the court to permit the applicant to withdraw the application while reserving the right …

MOHAMED NADEEM HIDAYATULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Vicky Manohar Ladge, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he merely purchased a plot of land and was not involved in the alleged forgery and fraud. The prosecution alleged that the sale deed was …

BANDILAL DEVILAL YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered bail application No. 3423 of 2026 filed by Bansilal Devilal Yadav, accused in a case involving alleged fake currency under sections 178, 179, 180 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution relied on two witness statements: one from Accused No.2 alleging …

NITIN AAYALAJI WAKTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Nitin Aayalaji Wakte was arrested on 1 April 2022 for the murder of his wife and is charged under IPC sections 302, 307, 504 and 506. After more than four years and six months of pre‑trial detention, he filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The …

DNYANESHWAR @ ROHIT BAJRANG SAKATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Dnyaneshwar @ Rohit Bajrang Sakat, accused No.3 in a murder case (CR No. 425/2024). The FIR alleged that …

AKSHAY BALU SATHEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Akshay Balu Sathe, accused of murder under Section 302 IPC, had been in custody for over four years with only one witness examined. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, invoking his right to a speedy trial under Article 21. The Court examined …

NISHANT RAMESH SATPUTEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Nishant Ramesh Satpute, a 23‑year‑old first‑time offender, was arrested with a country pistol and three live cartridges and charged under Section 3(25) of the Arms Act, 1959, sections 113(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and sections 37(1) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, …

PRIL @ PRET RAJKUMAR JAINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Pril @ Preet Rajkumar Jain, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a theft case (C.R. No. 599 of 2024) involving stolen BSNL cable. The prosecution alleged that the applicant and his father purchased …

ARIF AJIJ KURESHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Arif Ajij Kureshi, has been in custody for more than three years and ten months for alleged murder under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, based largely on a single circumstantial witness. He sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, …

FAISAL @ DADI SHAFI SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Faisal @ Dadi Shafi Shaikh, arrested on 14‑10‑2024, was charged under Sections 8(c), 22(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act for possession of 99.05 g of contraband, a commercial quantity. He has been in custody for 1 year 10 months while the trial has not commenced, whereas co‑accused No. 2 and No. 3 have …

ROHIT DNYANESHWAR BHANUSEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Rohit Dnyaneshwar Bhanuse, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Mr. Amit Icham, requested to withdraw the application as the court appeared reluctant to grant bail. The court entertained the request and …

AWADESH RAMNARAYAN VISHWAKARMA AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a borrower, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order of a Competent Magistrate issued under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, and sought to restrain the Court Commissioner from …

ROHIT DHANESH RUKE AND ORSversusDURGA CO-OP. HSG. SOCIETY LTD AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Rohit Dhanesh Ruke and others, filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court seeking condonation of a 119‑day delay in filing a review petition (ST No. 24845 of 2026) arising out of Writ Petition No. 1289 of 2000. The respondents, Durga Co‑op. Hsg. Society Ltd. and …

ROHIT DHANESH RUKE AND ORSversusDURGA CO-OP. HSG. SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Review Petitioners, Rohit Dhanesh Ruke and others, sought a review of a 24 April 2026 order that allowed Durga Co‑op. Housing Society Ltd. to close a road they claimed to use for access to their plots. They relied on earlier NA orders and layout plans dating from 1985 onward, asserting a right …

M/S. BHADIYADRA IMPEX AND ORSversusCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

Disposed Off

The petitioners, M/s. Bhadiyadra Impex and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court and later sought permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel, Mr. Pratik Barot, appeared on their behalf and requested the withdrawal. The Court granted the request and dismissed the …

MAHESH GANESH KULKARNIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Santosh Shivaji Salgar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested to withdraw the application, indicating that the court was not inclined to grant bail. The court entertained the request and allowed the withdrawal of …

VARSHA PUSHKAR VYAS AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a criminal complaint lodged against them before the Economic Offences Wing, Mumbai, and alternatively asked for service of the complaint or a closure report under Section 173(3)(i) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State’s …

Gangaram Yasha ShidversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicant, Gangaram Yasha Shid, was convicted by a First Class Judicial Magistrate in Raigad-Alibag for offences under IPC sections 354, 354-A(1) and 509, receiving one year of rigorous imprisonment, one year of simple imprisonment, and a compensation order under CrPC section 357(3). The …

ASEEM D SHARMAversusRITA ASEEM SHARMA

Disposed Off

Petitioners Vaishali Aseem D Sharma and Rita Aseem Sharma filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against respondents Anil Tikam and Aseem D Sharma respectively. The petitions were filed without any supporting documents or detailed allegations, and no counsel appeared on …

SUNIL KUMAR GOYALversusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA AND ANR

Disposed Off

Sunil Kumar Goyal filed a criminal writ petition challenging a SEBI Special Judge's order that issued process against him under Section 24(2) of the SEBI Act for failing to pay a penalty. The petitioner argued that, under Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, an accused …

TEJAS KAILAS DAKI AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application but failed to disclose their criminal antecedents. The learned appellate court pointed out this omission and, on the applicants' request, allowed them to withdraw the application. The court granted liberty to file a fresh application, provided …

NAGU SURESH GAIKWADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Nagu Suresh Gaikwad, was arrested on 7 September 2026. She had earlier filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 2543/2026) before the Bombay High Court. After her arrest, she requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The learned counsel for the applicant informed the …

MANOJKUMAR SURESHCHAND LUNKAD AND ORSversusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought an interim order to stay the physical possession of a flat that had been secured by Punjab National Bank under the Securitisation Act. The High Court had earlier rejected their interim relief on 2 September 2026, reasoning that they had not made out a prima facie case. After a …

PRAMOD KRISHNAJI BORKAR AND ORS.versusSHASHIKANT LAXMAN JACHAK

Dismissed as Withdrawn

The applicants, Pramod Krishnaji Borkar and others, filed a civil revision application (No. 660 of 2018) before the High Court of Bombay. Subsequently, they approached the court seeking leave to withdraw the revision on the basis of written instructions. The court examined the request and, …

RASHESH DILIP JOSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Rashesh Dilip Joshi, sought a revision of the Special Court's order refusing his discharge in a bribery case involving customs officials. The prosecution alleged that Accused No.1 Rajesh Rane demanded and collected a bribe from the complainant and that the applicant, a customs …

SAYALI HRISHIKESH NIKAMversusBALASAHEB SAHADEV NIKAM AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Sayali Hrishikesh Nikam, filed a criminal writ petition against the respondents. Both parties subsequently settled the dispute, and the petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The court considered whether a settled dispute permits withdrawal of a pending writ petition. …

Rahul Kalusing PawaraversusThe State of Maharashtra

Allowed

The petitioners sought restoration of Writ Petition No. 16758 of 2023, which had been dismissed for alleged non‑removal of office objections. They contended that the petition had been properly registered and no objections existed, but argued that the court's earlier directions required compliance. …

SINDHUBAI BALIRAM CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. G.P. AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Sindhubai Baliram Chavan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra to correct revenue records for her land in Raigad, alleging that acquisition proceedings from 1964 had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act and Section 11A of …

Amlin Underwriting LimitedversusNew India Assurance Co Ltd

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Amlin Underwriting Limited, filed a miscellaneous civil application before the Bombay High Court and subsequently sought leave to withdraw the same, requesting liberty to file an appropriate application in the pending suit before the trial court. The respondent, New India Assurance …

JAGDAMBA PRASAD BADAI YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Jagdamba Prasad Badai Yadav, was charged under IPC sections 376, 376(3), 354, 452 and POCSO Act sections 4, 8, 12 for allegedly inserting a finger into the genitalia of a six‑year‑old girl. The charge‑sheet was filed in 2022 but the charge was not framed until 21 July 2025, leading to …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITIONversusCHANDRAKANT KACHARU @ KACHARYA GAIKWAD (SINCE DECEASED THR LRS 1.1 SUNITA CHANDRAKANT GAIKWAD) ORS

Allowed

The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), filed a first appeal (ST) No. 30712 of 2019 against the heirs of the deceased Chandrakant Kacharu. An interim application (No. 6610 of 2026) was filed seeking relief under prayer clauses b to e. The High Court examined …

ASHOK RAMDAS BHAVSARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicants sought a revision of the Sessions Court's order rejecting their discharge application in a case alleging they abetted the suicide of a woman due to a property dispute. The prosecution argued that the deceased's suicide was a direct result of a property dispute with the applicants, …

TANAJI NAMDEO NIKATE AND ANRversusSACHIN LAXMAN MOHOL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed two interim applications in Writ Petition No. 4320/2022. The first sought substitution of the names of the legal representatives of Respondent No.13 and condonation of a 1,213‑day delay. The second sought substituted service of Respondents Nos.9 and 14 by newspaper publication …

ABHISEK MANISH BHATTACHARYAversusPAYEL BANERJEE

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Abhisek Manish Bhattacharya, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel was appointed for the petitioner and the petitioner did not appear on the last two hearing dates. The respondent, Payel Banerjee, was represented by Mr. Akhilesh Pote. The Court noted the …

MANEKA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition filed by Maneka Co‑Operative Housing Society seeking a Transferable Development Right (TDR) for land acquired in 1984‑85. The Society had complied with the conditions of Development Control Regulation N‑2.4.17, handed over possession to the Pune Municipal …

YASH JAGDIP MEHTAversusBHARATI SHARAD PARAB AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged an order of the City Civil Court that dismissed a notice of motion seeking redaction of an additional written statement filed by the defendants after the plaintiff amended the plaint. The plaintiff alleged that the additional written statement went beyond the scope of the …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION), RAIGAD AND ANR.versusSHANTABAI KASHINATH PATIL SINCE DECEASED THR.HER LRS. 1.1) SHRI. VINAYAK KASHINATH PATIL AND ORS.

Allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against Shantabai Kashinath Patil and others. The Bombay High Court considered several interim applications (Nos. 2415, 2416 of 2021; 573, 574 of 2025) and a cross objection. The court allowed the interim applications in accordance with the respective prayer …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISITION), RAIGAD AND ANR.versusSHANTABAI KASHINATH PATIL SINCE DECEASED THR.HER LRS. 1.1) SHRI. VINAYAK KASHINATH PATIL AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra appealed against Shantabai Kashinath Patil and others. The Bombay High Court considered several interim applications (Nos. 2415, 2416 of 2021; 573, 574 of 2025) and a cross objection. The court allowed the interim applications in accordance with the respective prayer …

BABAN BAPU KHARAT AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The Applicants, who were original respondents in a domestic violence (DV) proceeding, filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of the DV complaint against them, arguing that the complaint contains no specific allegations against them. The State contended that the remedy of …

PINTOO SARJU GAUTAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC filed by Pintoo Sarju Gautam, accused of offences including murder, kidnapping, and sexual assault against a 16‑year‑old deaf boy. The prosecution’s case relied solely on a “last seen” theory, with no direct or circumstantial …

SHEKHAR PRAMOD KADAMversusANANT SHANKARRAO KADAM AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Shekhar Pramod Kadam, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 21 November 2022 passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, which rejected an intervenor's application to join Application No. 175 of 2019 pending before the Commissioner. The respondents, who are the original …

AKARSHAN RAMESH SHRISHRIMALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, accused as No.3 in an NDPS case, sought bail under Section 439 of the CrPC after being detained for one year and nine months with no trial progress. The prosecution alleged he supplied small quantities of contraband, based on evidence from his mobile phone, and received modest sums …

Vikas Sunil NaikversusShital Vikas Naik

Disposed Off

Vikas Sunil Naik filed a writ petition against Shital Vikas Naik in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought the court's permission to withdraw the petition. The court considered the petitioner's counsel's submission regarding the withdrawal. Finding no impediment, the …

CHETAN SANJAY MAHAJANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Chetan Sanjay Mahajan, accused No.3 in a fraud case involving the ‘Open Hands’ investment scheme. The prosecution alleged that the accused participated in a syndicate that amassed Rs.26.73 lakhs, …

CHANDRAKANT NARAYAN PATIL AND ORSversusPRAMOD KESHAV PATIL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to amend their plaint at the appellate stage to address grounds on which the trial court had non-suited them. The District Judge of Raigad Alibag rejected the application for amendment on 14 October 2025. The petitioners challenged this order by filing a writ petition in the …

DAYARAM LAXMAN MHATREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Dayaram Laxman Mhatre, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue the remedy outlined by the …

MOHIUDDIN SIDDIQUI @ MOHIN KHAN @ MOIN KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The appellant, Mohiuddin Siddiqui, appealed against the Special Judge’s order denying bail in NIA Special Case No.666 of 2022, which involved charges under the IPC, Arms Act, Maharashtra Police Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). He had been in custody for over seven and a half …

RENUKA NIKHL KHANNA @ JAKHARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a regular bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by Renuka Nikhil Khanna, accused of murdering her husband under Section 302 IPC. The applicant had been in custody for over two years and suffered …

SATISH RAMVILASH PANDEYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Satish Ramvilash Pandey, filed a writ petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of FIR No. 254 of 2019 relating to an alleged assault on 24 April 2019. The prosecution alleged that accused No.1 and No.2 assaulted the complainant, while the petitioner …

HAFIJULLA SOHABATALI KHAN @ BHATTUversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Hafijulla Sohabatali Khan, accused in a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case involving heroin, ganja and codeine syrup seized from co‑accused. The prosecution relied on statements of three co‑accused who alleged that the …

SHRI JASWANTLAL MANILAL SHAH and ORS.versusJAYANTILAL BHANJI SHAH and OTHERS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought relief in a writ petition concerning possession of suit premises, while the respondents filed a civil revision application. The parties submitted affidavits confirming that the suit premises had been vacated and that applicant No.1A had handed over the keys to the respondents. …

JAYANTILAL BHANJI SHAH AND ORS.versusJASWANTLAL MANILAL SHAH AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Swapnil Jayantilal Bhanji Shah and others, filed a writ petition against the respondents, Jaswantilal Manilal Shah and others. During the hearing, the court issued an order on 8 September 2026 in which the word "respondent" was mistakenly typed instead of "applicant" in paragraph 1. …

NAVNATH KAKASAHEB NIHALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered an application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for bail to Navnath Kakasaheb Nihal, accused of murder and related offences under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant had been in custody for over two years, with a period of …

MRS. SMITA MANOJ KHARATversusBABAN BAPU KHARAT AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Applicants, who were original respondents in a domestic violence (DV) proceeding, filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of the DV complaint against them, arguing that the complaint contains no specific allegations against them. The State contended that the remedy of …

MAHIBUB ABDUL RASHID SHEIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking an order for the State to lodge a criminal case based on an inquiry report of a committee. The High Court examined whether such a petition is maintainable. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Sujal Vishwas …

INDERPAL SINGH SAHNIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Inderpal Singh Sahni, sought the withdrawal of a bail bond of Rs. 1.46 crore that was deposited as a condition for his release. The High Court noted that the bail was granted on 7 November 2017 and that the trial had not yet commenced. The State argued that the application was not …

Rohini Gupta AND ANRversusDistrict Deputy registrar Coperative Societies AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, heirs of a 1975 leaseholder, challenged a 23 June 2025 order of the District Deputy Registrar that issued a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance of 3,901.70 sq.m. of land to Respondent No.3 Society under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA). The core issue was whether …

BALENDRASINGH SHIVMURTISINGH THAKURversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Balendrasingh Shivmurtisingh Thakur, was convicted of several offences including murder under IPC s.396 and related sections, receiving two separate life sentences that were to run concurrently. He challenged the State's order classifying his case under Category 6(c) of the G.R. …

ASHRFUL SADEEK ALI TARAFDARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Ashrful Sadeek Ali Tarafdar, was arrested for possession of eleven bottles of codeine phosphate cough syrup, a commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, while a co‑accused possessed eight bottles, an intermediate quantity. He has been in custody for over a year without charge framing …

ATAUR RAHEMAN MOHD. HASHIM ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The petitioner, Ataur Raheman Mohd. Hashim Ansari, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner reported that the petitioner was not in contact with his lawyers and had repeatedly sought adjournments since March 2026, with no instructions provided even on the …

AKSHAR DEVELOPERSversusSTATE TAX OFFICER (RAI-VAT-C-027) AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Akshar Developers filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging a tax assessment. While the petition was pending, the petitioner filed an appeal before the appropriate Appellate Authority. The petitioner then moved the High Court seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition, …

MIRAAJ OBEROI KNOWN AS HEMAL VORAversusRHEA ALIAS DHRUTI HEMAL VORA

Disposed Off

Petitioner Miraaj Oberoi (formerly Hemal Vora) filed a writ petition against Rhea (Dhruti) Hemal Vora seeking relief. The petition was not pursued further by the petitioner. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and, without examining any substantive issues, dismissed the petition. No arguments or …

P. PRABHAKARANversusASHOK KISANDA SUGANDHI ( DECEASED )

Disposed Off

The appellant, a director of a company, challenged a district court judgment that declared a sale deed dated 19 June 2001, executed by the deceased plaintiff in his capacity as director, to be null and void. The appeal raised two substantive questions: whether the legal heirs of the deceased could …

P. PRABHAKARANversusASHOK KISANDA SUGANDHI ( DECEASED ) AND ORS

Disposed Off

The appellant, a director of a company, challenged a district court judgment that declared a sale deed dated 19 June 2001, executed by the deceased plaintiff in his capacity as director, to be null and void. The appeal raised two substantive questions: whether the legal heirs of the deceased could …

NIRMAN UMESH SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Disposed Off

The appellant, Nirman U. Singh, failed to appear before the High Court and showed no interest in prosecuting the appeal. The record indicated the appellant's lack of participation. The Court examined whether the appeal could proceed without the appellant's prosecution. Finding no prosecution, the …

DESEARCH PANTACLE PVT LTDversusSANTOSH ANANTA DALVI

Disposed Off

M/s. Desearch Pantacle Pvt. Ltd. filed three writ petitions in the Bombay High Court against three respondents. The parties jointly appeared and submitted that they had amicably settled all disputes, presenting signed consent terms and handing over the agreed demand draft and cheques to the …

M/S DESEARCH PANTACLE PVT LTDversusKAILAS BALKRISHNA BAGUL

Disposed Off

The petitioners, M/s. Desearch Pantacle Pvt. Ltd., filed three writ petitions in the Bombay High Court against three respondents. All parties jointly appeared before the Court and submitted that they had amicably settled the disputes. The consent terms, signed by the authorized representatives of …

DESEARCH PANTACLE PVT LTDversusJAYRAM DASHRATH DESHMUKH

Disposed Off

The petitioners, M/s. Desearch Pantacle Pvt. Ltd., filed three writ petitions challenging actions of the respondents. During the hearing, counsel for both sides informed the Court that the parties had amicably settled all disputes and presented signed consent terms. The consent terms, signed by …

SHUBHAM @ RUSHIKESH BAJIRAO BHAGWATversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Shubham @ Rushikesh Bhagwat, sought to file a criminal appeal against a conviction but missed the prescribed period by 80 days. An interim application was filed requesting condonation of this delay. The court examined the application, considered the applicant's bona fides, and found …

SALOMAN MATHEW TUSCANOversusVASAI-VIRAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Saloman Mathew Tuscano, filed a writ petition seeking a direction that the Vasai Virar Municipal Corporation (VVCMC) take the notice issued under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 to its logical end. The respondents had issued a notice in December 2013 …

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RAIGADversusLAXMIBAI JANARDAN KHATATE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The Executive Engineer, Hetvane Dam Division filed a first appeal against a Reference Award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and sought condonation of a four‑year delay in filing the appeal. The appellant submitted Interim Application No. 9011 of 2024, claiming the delay was due …

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RAIGADversusLAXMIBAI JANARDAN KHATATE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The Executive Engineer, Hetvane Dam Division filed a first appeal against a Reference Award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and sought condonation of a four‑year delay in filing the appeal. The appellant submitted Interim Application No. 9011 of 2024, claiming the delay was due …

EDELWEISS FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITEDversusMULTI COMMODITY EXCHANGE LIMITED

Allowed To be withdrawn

The appellant, Edelweiss Financial Services Ltd., filed an appeal against an order dated 2026 and subsequently sought leave to withdraw the appeal, requesting liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings thereafter. The appellant's counsel, comprising Mr. Akash Rebello and colleagues, argued for the …

IMRANA MAZHAR SULTAN AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The appellants, Imran M. Sultan and others, filed Criminal Appeal No. 786 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. Counsel for the appellants applied to the court for permission to withdraw the appeal. The learned judge, after considering the …

Amar Hydrocarbon Pvt LtdversusUnion of India

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Amar Hydrocarbon Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking an order directing the Union of India and its officials to release a consignment of goods covered by Bill of Entry No. 7182173 dated 3 August 2023. The petitioner relied on a prior judgment of the same court in Writ Petition …

OMKAR KRUSHAN MAGARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Omkar Krushna Magar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with CR No. 366 of 2025, which alleged his involvement in a crime by providing a mobile phone, SIM card and a vehicle to co‑accused after the …

MOHIT MISHRAversusTECH MAHINDRA LIMITED

Allowed

Mr. Mohit Mishra filed an interim application seeking to intervene in Writ Petition No. 459 of 2026 filed by Tech Mahindra Ltd. before the Bombay High Court. The court examined the application and noted that the petitioner, Tech Mahindra Ltd., did not oppose the proposed intervention. Relying on its …

BHARTI RAJMANIKAMversusLAHU GANPAT JAMDARE AND ORS

Disposed Off

Bharti Rajmanikam filed a writ petition challenging the respondents Lahu Ganpat Jamdare & Ors. The petitioner sought relief, but the Court observed that the petitioner already has an efficacious remedy of filing an appeal against the impugned order under Order 43 of the Code of Civil Procedure, …

BIMAL KUMAR AWADH PRASAD SINGHversusM/S SYSTEMATIC INFOTECH PVT LTD AND ANR

Disposed Off

Petitioners Arjun Vitthal and Bimal Kumar Awadh Prasad Singh filed writ petitions challenging an order of issuance of process dated 23 March 2016. Respondent Systematic Infotech Pvt. Ltd. argued that the appropriate remedy was a revision petition, not a writ. The Court accepted this contention, …

BIMAL KUMAR AWADH PRASAD SINGHversusM/S SYSTEMATIC INFOTECH PVT LTD AND ANR

Disposed Off

Petitioners Arjun Vitthal and Bimal Kumar Awadh Prasad Singh filed writ petitions challenging an order of issuance of process dated 23 March 2016. Respondent Systematic Infotech Pvt. Ltd. argued that the appropriate remedy was a revision petition, not a writ. The Court accepted this contention, …