Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 14201–14400
The Executive Engineer, Hetvane Dam Division filed an appeal against a Reference Award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but delayed filing the appeal for over six years. An interim application was made seeking condonation of this delay, citing various reasons including the …
The Executive Engineer, Hetvane Dam Division filed an appeal against a Reference Award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but sought condonation of a 6‑year‑10‑day delay in filing the appeal. The appellant’s interim application argued that the delay was due to the COVID‑19 pandemic …
The applicant, Mr. Jayprakash Pralhad Bind, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Arnav Rane, instructed the court to withdraw the bail application. The court considered the request and granted leave to withdraw the application. Consequently, …
The Bombay High Court considered a regular bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by Renuka Nikhil Khanna, accused of murdering her husband under Section 302 IPC. The applicant had been in custody for over two years and suffered …
The petitioner, Amitex Trading Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 29 June 2026 that cancelled its GST registration on the ground of alleged violation of Rule 21(b) for issuing invoices without supply. The petitioner argued that earlier show‑cause notices on the same issue had been withdrawn …
The appellant, Edelweiss Financial Services Ltd., filed an appeal against an order dated 2026 and subsequently sought leave to withdraw the appeal, requesting liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings thereafter. The appellant's counsel, comprising Mr. Akash Rebello and colleagues, argued for the …
The petitioner Arvind Prasad challenged an order dated 24.04.2026 issued by the trial court without first granting him a hearing, alleging violation of Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 which requires a hearing before issuing process. The High Court examined whether the …
The petitioner, Neha Akshar Biyani, filed a writ petition challenging a lower court order that denied her permission to examine six witnesses in a marriage petition filed in 2017. The petitioner argued that an earlier order dated 16.04.2026 by the High Court had granted her the right to examine …
Deepak Ambalal Shah filed a criminal revision application challenging the judgment and order in Criminal Appeal No. 284 of 2024. The High Court examined whether the appellate court's decision was legally sound and whether procedural irregularities warranted its setting aside. Finding merit in the …
The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Kisan Jagtap, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the District Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and others. The petition was filed on a praecipe and subsequently, the petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the …
The petitioners, Balasaheb Vinayakrao Kane and Pathan Yusuf Khan Ibrahim Khan, challenged a order dated 30 March 2026 issued by the Deputy Director of Education, Pune Region, which cancelled the approval of their appointments originally granted on 27 January 1992 and consequently denied them pension …
The applicant, Rajendra Handaswami Vaniyar, filed an interim application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against the trial court's order denying bail. The High Court examined whether the delay could be justified under the principles governing procedural time limits. Relying on the …
The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Kalyan Zone, which had directed the company to reconnect electricity supply to M/s Bhagwandas Ispat Pvt. Ltd. The forum’s order also warned that if a notice …
Roshan Machindra Pagar applied for bail before the High Court of Bombay against the State of Maharashtra. The charge-sheet had already been filed. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, permitted the applicant to withdraw the bail application, granting him liberty to file a fresh bail …
Dipak Machindra Pagar and another filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court in a criminal matter where a charge-sheet had already been filed against them. The applicants were represented by Mr. Chinmay K. Gunjal, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa. The …
The appellant, convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine, has been incarcerated for over 11 years in an open prison and has no prior criminal record. He filed an interim application seeking bail and suspension of his sentence pending a criminal appeal …
The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with alleged customs duty evasion offences under the Customs Act, 1962. The prosecution relied on a statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act by co‑accused Chirag …
The High Court of Bombay heard a writ petition filed by China Merchants Bank challenging an order of the City Civil Court. The petitioner argued that the defence raised in the written statement and the progress of the trial warranted interference with the impugned order. The Court observed that, …
The applicant, Ajay Shivkishor Soni, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. Subsequently, he sought leave to withdraw that application so that he could file a fresh bail application before the trial court on new grounds, including after the filing of a charge-sheet. The …
The petitioner, Rahul Leekha, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was presented before a two‑judge bench comprising Justices Bharati Dangre and Ashish S. Chavan. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Soham …
Rahul Gandhi filed a writ petition challenging the issuance of process against him for alleged defamation under Section 500 IPC, based on a complaint by Mahesh H. Shrishrimal, a BJP member. The petitioner argued that the complainant lacked locus standi under Section 199 CrPC and that the BJP, being …
The petitioners, Alka Uttam Parande and others, filed a writ petition (ST) seeking relief against the respondents, Tanna Green CHSL and others. The trial court had dismissed the petition on 02/07/2026 on the ground that the petitioners had not removed an office objection. The petitioners filed an …
The petitioners sought relief in a writ petition concerning possession of suit premises, while the respondents filed a civil revision application. The parties submitted affidavits confirming that the suit premises had been vacated and that applicant No.1A had handed over the keys to the respondents. …
The appellants, Rovina Sheldon Remedius and Sheldon Desmond Remedius, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after being implicated in a murder case (Crime No. 153 of 2025) arising from a property dispute. The FIR lodged by the deceased's …
The applicant, Sangram Himmat Ghatge, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court but did not appear for the hearing. The State of Maharashtra, represented by Ms. Anuja S. Gotad, opposed the application. The court noted that a charge-sheet had already been filed against the applicant. The …
Smt. Asha Pravin Agarwal purchased Plot No.5 in Raigad and later faced possession by the Forest Department after notices under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Collector declared the land a private forest and vested it in the State, an order affirmed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in 2008 …
The petition challenges a May 2, 2026 order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, which deleted municipal officers (Defendants 9 and 10) from a suit seeking declaration of ownership and injunction against encroachment. The petitioner contended that the pleadings sufficiently alleged that the …
The applicant, Rohan Anil Devadhe, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested to withdraw the application. The sole issue before the court was whether the anticipatory bail application could be withdrawn at the …
The applicant, Arundhati Jayadeep Tambvekar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC Sections 420 and 406. The prosecution alleged that the applicant induced a …
M/s. S. R. Chaudhari Constructions filed a writ petition fearing that CIDCO might allot plots under its 12.5% scheme while a representation filed on 11‑05‑2026 was still pending. An interim Letter of Intent dated 15‑04‑2026 had been issued by CIDCO in favour of another respondent. The petitioner …
The petitioner Fatima Shafique Khan challenged a City Civil Court order that allowed a Chamber Summons to represent the deceased in L.C. Suit No. 2960 of 2014. The petitioner argued that the respondents had made contradictory statements in their affidavit and that the court incorrectly recorded that …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for offences alleged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges the applicant participated in an assault captured on CCTV, …
Petitioner Pravin Dilip Waghela was required to surrender after completing his parole but was hospitalized for heart problems. The High Court had earlier, on 20/08/2026, ordered that no coercive action be taken against him until 08/09/2026. The petitioner sought an extension of this interim …
The petitioner, Vakas Sagir Dond, sought to be impleaded in a suit for perpetual injunction filed by his brother (Respondent No.1) to restrain Respondents Nos.2 and 3 from taking possession of Shop No.1. The petitioner claimed a rival right of occupation and alleged that the suit was collusive to …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation filed an appeal against a Reference Award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but sought to condone a delay of 2,977 days in filing the appeal. The appellant submitted Interim Application No. 11503 seeking condonation, citing the …
The appellant, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 2,977‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Reference Award passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court examined the applicant’s explanation for the …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation filed a first appeal against a Reference Award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but delayed filing the appeal by 2,928 days. The appellant sought condonation of this delay, arguing that the COVID‑19 pandemic and procedural …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation filed a first appeal against a Reference Award under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but delayed filing the appeal by 2,928 days. The appellant sought condonation of this delay, arguing that the COVID‑19 pandemic and procedural …
Vinaykumar, a 72‑year‑old advocate, was arrested on 14 September 2025 for alleged cheating and forgery involving a forged magistrate order. He has been in custody for over a year and suffers from diabetes, hypertension and advanced bilateral cataract requiring urgent surgery, as documented in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Chetan Yashwant Ingale, who had been in custody for three years and two months since his arrest on 06‑07‑2023. He is charged in C.R. No. 64 of 2023 with multiple serious offences …
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Gokul Nana Kokare, accused No.2 in a case of alleged homicide under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Kokare, a …
The applicants, Navdurga Steel Traders & Anr., filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging an order dated 9 July 2026 by the Additional Sessions Judge which continued a stay of execution subject to a 20 percent deposit of compensation …
The applicants, Navdurga Steel Traders & Anr., filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, challenging an order dated 9 July 2026 by the Additional Sessions Judge which continued a stay of execution subject to a 20 percent deposit of compensation …
The applicant, Sagar Krushna Pitalwar, filed an interim application seeking to amend his criminal application before the Bombay High Court. The court examined the praecipe and heard counsel for the applicant. It held that the amendment set out in paragraphs 2 to 11 of the interim application could …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging a 2011 order that dismissed their appeal under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (IC& R) Act, 1971 and directed eviction. The High Court gave the petitioners multiple opportunities to show the present status of the premises and to seek interim …
The petitioner, Amit Vikas Paralkar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue the remedy outlined by the Supreme Court in M. Subramaniam & Anr. Vs. S. Janaki & Anr. (2020) 16 SCC 728. The …
The petitioners, who were office bearers of a cooperative society, challenged the disqualification order passed by the Deputy Registrar under Section 76(2) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1960. The society was undertaking redevelopment and several special general body meetings (SGBMs) …
Mahesh Brahmadatta Tiwari filed a writ petition challenging an order of the City Civil Court that refused to delete issues framed on 2 April 2026 on the grounds of res judicata and maintainability. The petitioner contended that neither the doctrine of res judicata nor Order XXII Rule 9 of the CPC …
The applicants, senior citizens aged 86 and 82, filed criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) challenging orders that rejected their exemption from personal appearance, issued non‑bailable warrants and directed them to attend …
The applicants, senior citizens aged 86 and 82, filed criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) challenging orders that rejected their exemption from personal appearance, issued non‑bailable warrants and directed them to attend …
Petitioner Devendrakumar Takhatmalji Kothari filed an interim application before the Bombay High Court seeking the removal of Kanifnath Dnyanoba Kamthe from a board, alleging that the respondent was wrongly placed on the board. The application was listed as Interim Application No. 7057 of 2026 and …
The applicants, senior citizens aged 86 and 82, filed criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) challenging orders that rejected their exemption from personal appearance, issued non‑bailable warrants and directed them to attend …
The applicants, senior citizens aged 86 and 82, filed criminal applications under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (equivalent to Section 482 CrPC) challenging orders that rejected their exemption from personal appearance, issued non‑bailable warrants and directed them to attend …
The petitioners, People’s Education Society, sought a court directive to obtain approval for their law college from the Bar Council of India (BCI) and the Directorate of Higher Education, Pune (DHE). The court ordered that the petitioners must submit their proposal, requisite documents, and pay the …
The appellant, a 74‑year‑old senior citizen, has lived in Shed No.16, Dolarwadi, Mumbai for over six decades and claims the ground‑floor structure was an old residential building existing before the 17 April 1964 datum line. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) issued a notice under …
The petitioner Arjun Vitthal Kudhekar filed a writ petition seeking the disposal of an Externment Appeal filed under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, challenging the legality of Externment Order No.11 of 2026 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone‑I, Pimpri‑Chinchwad. The …
The appeal concerns a land acquisition dispute between the State of Maharashtra (Special Land Acquisition Officer) and several claimants led by Ragho Alias Ragha Kamlya Koli. The claimants had deposited an amount pending determination of compensation, and an interim application was filed seeking …
The villagers applied for a declaration that a road passes through a particular parcel of land, but their interim applications failed to describe the road precisely and did not implead the landowner, Sanjita Sandesh Sanap. The High Court observed that without such particulars the court could not …
The applicant, Vinod Tejbahadur Singh, was charged under IPC sections 302, 120(B) and 34 for a murder allegedly committed in conspiracy with 13 others. The prosecution argued that the murder was pre‑planned and the applicant had absconded, thus denying bail. The defence highlighted the applicant's …
The petitioners, Uttarakhand Education Society Bharatiy Vidyalaya & Divine Pupils Academy, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against a judgment and decree dated 14 March 2023 passed by the Civil Judge, Thane, in Special Civil Suit No. 619/2012. They also applied for …
The petitioners, Krushna Gajanan Karke and others, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction that the Trust (Respondent No.2) include their names in its Register of Members and Voters' List for the upcoming Executive Committee elections (2026‑2031) based on Clause 6(B) of the Trust's …
The appellant, Fahad Khan, challenged a municipal notice alleging unauthorized construction and sought ad‑interim relief, which the trial court denied. The appellant contended that the trial court failed to consider relevant documents, plans, and municipal records before rejecting the relief. The …
The appellant, Fahad Khan, challenged a municipal notice alleging unauthorized construction and sought ad‑interim relief, which the trial court denied. The appellant contended that the trial court failed to consider relevant documents, plans, and municipal records before rejecting the relief. The …
The High Court of Bombay entertained two interim applications (Nos. 6857 and 6858 of 2025) filed by the appellant, Executive Engineer Shabnoor Ayub Pathan, in the civil appeal No. 25116 of 2024. The court examined the prayer clauses of each application and, finding that the conditions were …
The High Court of Bombay entertained two interim applications (Nos. 6857 and 6858 of 2025) filed by the appellant, Executive Engineer Shabnoor Ayub Pathan, in the civil appeal No. 25116 of 2024. The court examined the prayer clauses of each application and, finding that the conditions were …
The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe candidate, sought urgent relief after the State CET Cell failed to cancel his admission to an engineering college despite the expiry of the deadline for submitting a Tribe Validity Certificate. The Court noted earlier orders directing the Scheduled Tribe Certificate …
The petitioner, a minor represented by her guardian, filed a writ petition seeking urgent relief because the State CET Cell required a Scheduled Tribe Validity Certificate that had not yet been issued by the Scrutiny Committee. The Court had previously ordered the Committee to decide the tribe claim …
The applicant, Vasant Anandrao Idhol, filed an anticipatory bail application but failed to disclose his criminal antecedents. The prosecution highlighted this omission, and the applicant's counsel admitted the oversight, seeking permission to withdraw the application and refile with full disclosure, …
The petitioners challenged the selection of members of an authorized committee by the Deputy Registrar, alleging that relatives of complainants and a non‑member were appointed and that the committee was taking policy decisions beyond its limited purpose of conducting elections. They also sought the …
The petitioners Hitesh Pipalia and others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 1 September 2026, which granted a stay to an earlier order dated 20 August 2026 issued by the Assistant Registrar under Section 76(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Division Joint …
The petitioner, Jitendra Shankar, filed a writ petition (No. 11959 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition was presented by advocates Chandrakant Thorat and G.K. Chinchole. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel …
The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe candidate, sought urgent relief after the State CET Cell failed to cancel her admission despite the expiry of the deadline for submitting a Scheduled Tribe Validity Certificate. The Court noted earlier orders granting a six‑month period to the Scrutiny Committee to …
The petitioner, Sumit Pradip Sonwane, filed Writ Petition No. 11966 of 2026 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Chandrakant R. Thorat together with Mr. Yashraj Joshi, Mr. O.D. Totawad and Mr. …
The petitioner, Omkar, sought a writ directing the State of Maharashtra and the CET Cell not to cancel his admission to a B.E./B.Tech program on the ground that he had not yet submitted a Scheduled Tribe Validity Certificate, pending the decision of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny …
The petitioner, Shriram Devidas Fulsure, sought urgent relief to obtain provisional admission to a B.E./B.Tech program as a Scheduled Tribe (ST) candidate, despite the pending decision of the Scheduled Tribes Certificate Scrutiny Committee on his caste validity. The State CET Cell required …
The petitioner filed an interim application seeking restoration of a Civil Revision Application that had been dismissed for failure to remove an office objection. The Registrar (Judicial) had ordered the petitioner to remove the objection within two weeks, but the petitioner inadvertently missed the …
The petitioner, Omkar, sought a direction to allow six months for submitting his Tribe Validity Certificate and to restrain the CET Cell and the college from cancelling his admission to a B.E./B.Tech course on the ground of non‑submission. The petition highlighted that his tribe validity claim was …
Baliram, the petitioner, sought protection of his admission to a B.E./B.Tech programme at a college (Respondent No.3) after the college threatened to cancel his seat for not submitting a Tribe Validity Certificate pending a decision by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee (Respondent …
The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe candidate, filed a writ petition seeking relief because the Scrutiny Committee had not decided his Tribe Validity Certificate claim filed on 7 May 2025, jeopardising his ability to appear for CAP Round 2 of NEET‑UG 2026. The Court noted a similar petition (Writ …
Sanved filed a writ petition (No. 12025 of 2026) against the State of Maharashtra. The petition raised a question of jurisdiction, specifically whether the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court should hear the matter, given the involvement of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Kinwat. …
The petitioner, Aarya, sought a direction to prevent the cancellation of her admission to a B.E. course on the ground that she had not yet submitted a Tribe Validity Certificate, pending the decision of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee. The Court noted similar petitions and the …
Jitendra Shankar Nijasure filed a writ petition seeking provisional admission to the Bachelor of Planning programme at the College of Engineering Pune under the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category, as his ST validity certificate was still pending before the Scheduled Tribes Certificate Verification …
The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe candidate, sought urgent relief after the State CET Cell failed to cancel his admission despite the expiry of the deadline for submitting a Scheduled Tribe Validity Certificate. The Court noted earlier orders granting a six‑month period to the Scrutiny Committee to …
Dhiraj Digambar Kanlod filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition raised the question of which bench of the Bombay High Court had jurisdiction to hear the matter, especially in view of the involvement of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, …
Advait Arvind Jethewad filed a writ petition seeking urgent relief because his Scheduled Tribe (ST) validity certificate had not been issued by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee within the six‑month period ordered by the court. The petitioner requested an extension for submitting …
The applicant, Sneha Ashish Shah, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs.25 lakh and a compensation of Rs.84,000 was awarded to the respondent. A non‑bailable warrant was issued and the applicant was taken into custody, although the …
Vishal Parekar was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, for attempting to murder (IPC 307) and for offences under the Arms Act, receiving life imprisonment along with concurrent sentences for the arms charges. He appealed, arguing that the injury inflicted was non‑fatal, that he had …
The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against a decision involving Shabnoor Ayub Pathan. The appeal was filed beyond the prescribed period, prompting an interim application seeking condonation of delay. The court examined the reasons and, noting the appellant’s explanation, condoned the delay and …
The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against a decision involving Shabnoor Ayub Pathan. The appeal was filed beyond the prescribed period, prompting an interim application seeking condonation of delay. The court examined the reasons and, noting the appellant’s explanation, condoned the delay and …
Shri Suresh Kishan Nagane appealed before the Bombay High Court against Shri Sudhakar Dwarkanath Mahant and several other respondents. During the hearing, the parties executed consent terms that settled the dispute, with the appellant expressly renouncing any claim against respondents No. 1, 2 and …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (Executive Engineer) filed first appeals against orders of the reference court concerning land disputes with various respondents. The appellants filed the appeals after the statutory period, leading to applications for condonation of delay. The …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (Executive Engineer) filed first appeals against orders of the reference court concerning land disputes with various respondents. The appellants filed the appeals after the statutory period, leading to applications for condonation of delay. The …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (Executive Engineer) filed first appeals against orders of the reference court concerning land disputes with various respondents. The appellants filed the appeals after the statutory period, leading to applications for condonation of delay. The …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, through its Executive Engineer, filed several first appeals against orders affecting its land development projects. The respondents, including private individuals, opposed the corporation's claims. The appellants sought condonation of delay for …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (Executive Engineer) filed first appeals against orders of the reference court concerning land disputes with various respondents. The appellants filed the appeals after the statutory period, leading to applications for condonation of delay. The …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (Executive Engineer) filed first appeals against orders of the reference court concerning land disputes with various respondents. The appellants filed the appeals after the statutory period, leading to applications for condonation of delay. The …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (Executive Engineer) filed first appeals against orders of the reference court concerning land disputes with various respondents. The appellants filed the appeals after the statutory period, leading to applications for condonation of delay. The …
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation (Executive Engineer) filed first appeals against orders of the reference court concerning land disputes with various respondents. The appellants filed the appeals after the statutory period, leading to applications for condonation of delay. The …
Vijay Vasant Pawar filed Interim Application No. 4303 of 2022 in Revision Application (St.) No. 20369 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court. The application sought relief against the State of Maharashtra, but the pleadings did not disclose any prosecution or substantive cause of action. The Court …
The applicants, Bilal Shafi Sendule and another, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. They relied on the fact that FIR No. 236 of 2025, registered at Bhayander Police Station, had been quashed by the same court on 28 August 2026 in Criminal Application No. 1385 of …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against Shantabai Kashinath Patil and others. The Bombay High Court considered several interim applications (Nos. 2415, 2416 of 2021; 573, 574 of 2025) and a cross objection. The court allowed the interim applications in accordance with the respective prayer …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against Shantabai Kashinath Patil and others. The Bombay High Court considered several interim applications (Nos. 2415, 2416 of 2021; 573, 574 of 2025) and a cross objection. The court allowed the interim applications in accordance with the respective prayer …
The petitioner, having obtained development permission, excavated earth at a construction site and used it for filling and levelling. The State imposed a penalty of Rs. 16,17,19,964 under section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for unauthorised excavation of what it deemed a minor …
The petitioner, Hisamuddin Cheddu Shaikh, filed a contempt petition (No. 631 of 2024) arising out of Writ Petition No. 9816 of 2024 against the Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation and others. The petitioner later submitted an affidavit on 4 September 2026 indicating that he no longer wishes …
The applicant sought condonation of a six‑year delay in filing a first appeal against an award passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The court examined the applicant’s claim that the delay should be excluded for the period March 2020 to February 2022 and noted that the award was dated …
The appellant, Executive Engineer Minor Lift Shabnoor, filed an application seeking condonation of a six‑year delay in filing a first appeal against an award passed by the District Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The appellant argued that the delay was due to the time taken to …
The petitioners, owners of building ‘A’, challenged a 3 July 2019 order by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Thane, which granted a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance of the entire 539.30 sq.m. land to the respondent cooperative society. They argued that the conveyance …
The applicant sought condonation of a six‑year delay in filing a first appeal against an award passed by the District Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The applicant argued that the delay was due to the time taken to obtain a certified copy of the award and to complete procedural …
The applicant sought condonation of a six‑year delay in filing a first appeal against an award passed by the District Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The applicant argued that the delay was due to the time taken to obtain a certified copy of the award and to complete procedural …
The State of Maharashtra, as appellant, filed an appeal against the estate of Babu Changa Naik and others concerning a land acquisition matter. The appellant sought interim relief to amend the pleadings by deleting certain respondents and to stay the proceedings. The High Court, per Justice Amit …
The applicant, Executive Engineer Minor Lift Shabnoor Ayub Pathan, sought condonation of a six‑year delay in filing a first appeal against an award passed by the District Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The applicant argued that the delay was due to the time taken to obtain a …
The appellant, Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 2,977‑day delay in filing an appeal against a Reference Award passed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court examined the applicant’s explanation for the …
The petitioner, Kirit Enterprises Refrigeration Pvt. Ltd., filed an interim application seeking recall of the High Court's order dated 08.10.2025 which had disposed of several civil applications, notably CA/2777/2004, without considering the petitioner's amendment and exhibit requests. The …
The petitioner, Anand Jayant Rayate, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Neha Anand Rayate. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the dispute had already been resolved by the Family Court at Pune, rendering the writ petition unnecessary. The court considered this submission …
The appellant, Kantilal Nivrutti Rawate, filed several first appeals (ST) against the Special Land Acquisition Officer, accompanied by interim applications seeking condonation of delay. Four separate interim applications (Nos. 437/2026, 323/2026, 520/2026, and 559/2026) were filed, each requesting …
The appellant, Kantilal Nivrutti Rawate, filed several first appeals (ST) against the Special Land Acquisition Officer, accompanied by interim applications seeking condonation of delay. Four separate interim applications (Nos. 437/2026, 323/2026, 520/2026, and 559/2026) were filed, each requesting …
The petitioner, a retired Indian Army officer receiving a pension of Rs.80,000 per month, challenged a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs.35,000 monthly maintenance to his wife and 50% of their daughter's educational expenses. The petitioner argued that his wife's salary of Rs.1,68,000 per …
The appellant, Kantilal Nivrutti Rawate, filed several first appeals (ST) against the Special Land Acquisition Officer, accompanied by interim applications seeking condonation of delay. Four separate interim applications (Nos. 437/2026, 323/2026, 520/2026, and 559/2026) were filed, each requesting …
The appellant, Kantilal Nivrutti Rawate, filed several first appeals (ST) against the Special Land Acquisition Officer, accompanied by interim applications seeking condonation of delay. Four separate interim applications (Nos. 437/2026, 323/2026, 520/2026, and 559/2026) were filed, each requesting …
The petitioners, Vijay Kumar Chopra and others, filed writ petitions (Nos. 6443 and 6442 of 2025) challenging certain actions. Before the court could hear the matters, the alleged offences were compounded before the Lok Adalat. The petitioners then moved the court to withdraw the writ petitions on …
Petitioners Vijay Kumar Chopra filed Writ Petition Nos. 6443 and 6442 seeking relief against respondents. The petitioners later approached the Court requesting withdrawal of both writ petitions, stating that the underlying criminal offences had been compounded before the Lok Adalat. The Court …
The petitioner, Kumar Harishchandra Kakde, sought a writ declaring that his 6.10 guntha parcel of Survey No. 85/C in Tulinj, Vasai was not part of a land‑acquisition proceeding and that the State could not take possession of it. The Court ordered a joint measurement, which showed that the …
The applicant, Anish @ Bhuva Allauddin Shaikh, filed a bail application. The prosecution indicated it would complete trial within one year. The applicant sought to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh application if the trial exceeded one year. The Court granted leave to …
The Applicants filed a criminal application seeking to withdraw their earlier challenge to an order dated 16 March 2024 that authorized issuance of process under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Respondent argued that the proper remedy was a revision petition. The Court …
The applicant, Nazir Sameer Shaikh, filed a bail application which the trial court denied on the ground that proximity of the parties could lead to witness tampering. After the victim's evidence and other material witnesses were recorded, the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Jitendra Shankar Nijasure, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. Subsequently, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, submitting a letter dated 31st August 2026 to his counsel. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be permitted to …
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd filed several writ petitions challenging an office order that dismissed the petitions for non‑removal of objections. The petitions were subsequently settled amicably between the parties, and consent terms were filed and marked for identification. The High Court, after noting the …
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd filed several writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging an office order that dismissed the petitions for failure to remove objections. The court examined whether the dismissal was procedurally valid. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and filed …
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd filed several writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging an office order that dismissed the petitions for non‑removal of objections. The petitioners sought relief against the Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai and other respondents. The court noted that the parties …
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd filed multiple writ petitions challenging the dismissal of its stamp duty petitions by the Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai. The petitions had been dismissed on the ground of non‑removal of office objections. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and filed …
The petitioners, Kash Foods Pvt Ltd, filed multiple writ petitions challenging an office order that dismissed their petitions for failure to remove objections. The respondents, including the Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai, contended that the procedural requirements were not complied with. The …
Kash Foods Pvt Ltd filed several writ petitions challenging an office order that dismissed the petitions for failure to remove objections. The High Court observed that the parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and filed consent terms. The court took the consent terms on record, marked …
The petitioners challenged orders passed by a Mamlatdar’s Court that were based on an application filed by the respondents under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906. The Court observed that the application failed to describe the exact boundaries or particulars of the road for which relief …
The petitioners, former employees of Bank of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking the bank's service records, service book, and provident fund contribution details, along with directions to accept their payment and grant pension as per a circular dated 30‑03‑2024. They also requested a …
The petitioners, Jau Padu Kale and an associate, claimed tenancy rights over agricultural land, alleging they were family members of the respondents who had been granted ownership through 32‑G and 32‑M proceedings. They challenged the dismissal of their Section 70(b) tenancy application by the …
The petitioner, Ekta A. Akshay Muley, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The respondent, Akshay Dhanaji Muley, was served notice but no substantive …
The writ petition No.14412 of 2016 was filed by the legal heirs of the deceased Shabnoor Ayub Pathan against Sonubai Ganpat Patan and others. An interim application (No.6330 of 2026) was filed by the applicants, Manjula Manohar Patil, seeking relief as outlined in prayer clauses (a) to (c). The …
The High Court of Bombay heard multiple FERA appeals where none of the appellants appeared, despite previous notices. The court noted that the matters were old and, after reviewing the records, found no live issue remaining. Since the appellants were absent, the court exercised its power to dismiss …
The petitioners, a school management, challenged a School Tribunal order that had set aside an alleged "otherwise termination" of a handicapped employee (Respondent No.1) and directed payment of back‑wages from 5 April 2002 to 1 May 2003. The employee had been transferred in July 2000, challenged …
The petitioner, Farooq Amani Malik Khan, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as …
Petitioner Nirmala Shubham Nawale filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was initially dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner appeared disinterested. Subsequently, the petitioner's counsel tendered an unconditional apology for not being present, leading the …
The High Court of Bombay heard multiple FERA appeals where none of the appellants appeared, despite previous notices. The court noted that the matters were old and, after reviewing the records, found no live issue remaining. Since the appellants were absent, the court exercised its power to dismiss …
The Vibhag Niyantrak Maha. Rajya Parivahan Mahamandal Pune Division filed three writ petitions against respondents Mohan Digambar Chavare, Arjun Dattatray Shirke and the late Sanjay Dattatray Virkar. The petitioners sought correction of names in the pleadings and a resolution of disputes arising …
The Vibhag Niyantrak Maha. Rajya Parivahan Mahamandal Pune Division filed three writ petitions against respondents Mohan Digambar Chavare, Arjun Dattatray Shirke and the late Sanjay Dattatray Virkar. The petitioners sought correction of names in the pleadings and a resolution of disputes arising …
The Vibhag Niyantrak Maha. Rajya Parivahan Mahamandal Pune Division filed three writ petitions against respondents Mohan Digambar Chavare, Arjun Dattatray Shirke and the late Sanjay Dattatray Virkar. The petitioners sought correction of names in the pleadings and a resolution of disputes arising …
The petitioner, Shamina Rauf Patel, filed a complaint on 19 September 2025, leading to the registration of FIR No. 290 of 2026 under Sections 331(4), 305, 126(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 by the Taloja Police Station. The petitioner subsequently sought permission to furnish a …
The petitioner, Chetak Sanjay Bhagwat, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested permission to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the request and, without any …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The applicant, Gurjugdip Singh Smagh, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Section 439 of the CrPC for alleged offences under multiple provisions of the NDPS Act relating to the import of licorice roots contaminated with heroin. The prosecution’s case …
The appellants, Karbhari Vithoba Bodake and others, filed a second appeal against the decree of the deceased Eknath Vithoba Bodake's heirs. The parties had earlier resolved all disputes by executing a compromise deed on 16 October 2003, wherein the appellants agreed to withdraw the appeal. Counsel …
The High Court of Bombay heard multiple FERA appeals where none of the appellants appeared, despite previous notices. The court noted that the matters were old and, after reviewing the records, found no live issue remaining. Since the appellants were absent, the court exercised its power to dismiss …
The applicant, Aditya Anil Mulam, sought bail in a POCSO special case alleging penetrative sexual assault on a five‑year‑old boy, with charges under Section 377 IPC and Sections 4, 6, 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that there was a three‑day delay in filing the FIR and a ten‑day …
The High Court disposed of several interim applications filed in three writ petitions seeking to expedite the hearing and vacate an earlier interim order. The court ordered that the writ petitions be listed for disposal at the admission stage on 18 September 2026. Consequently, all pending interim …
The High Court disposed of several interim applications filed in three writ petitions seeking to expedite the hearing and vacate an earlier interim order. The court ordered that the writ petitions be listed for disposal at the admission stage on 18 September 2026. Consequently, all pending interim …
The High Court disposed of several interim applications filed in three writ petitions seeking to expedite the hearing and vacate an earlier interim order. The court ordered that the writ petitions be listed for disposal at the admission stage on 18 September 2026. Consequently, all pending interim …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
Two writ petitions were filed in the Bombay High Court – one by Smt. Kalpana Deepak Nagpure and another by the Secretary of Nashik Education Society – against Sandhya Ashok Waghavkar and others. The petitioners' counsel reported that despite repeated communications, the respondents failed to appear …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The applicant, Rajaram Biramlal Meghwal, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel, Mr. Veerdhawal Kakade, sought leave to withdraw the application and to file a fresh bail application before the trial court on new grounds, relying on a prior order dated 16 June …
Petitioner Sanjay Shridhar Bendre filed a writ petition challenging an operative order dated 7 September 2026. The court, on its own motion, noted that paragraph 6(b) of the order mistakenly recorded the year as 2015 instead of the correct year 2012. The issue was whether the court could amend its …
The Bombay High Court heard a series of writ petitions filed by several landowners who alleged that their lands had been erroneously mutated as ‘Private Forest’ without compliance with the procedure prescribed under Section 35 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The petitioners sought relief directing …
The petitioners, owners of 6,900 sq m of land in Bhayander, claimed that the State and MTNL had possessed the land since 1989 without paying compensation or completing acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. Parallel …
The petition challenges an order of the Revisional Authority that allowed respondent No.1 to intervene in pending proceedings, claiming protection as a statutory tenant. The Authority had preliminarily permitted the intervention but noted that the substantive question of tenancy must be decided …
Bharati Hanumant Thombare, a former teacher, was appointed part‑time in 1994 and later full‑time in 2009, retiring in 2025. The Deputy Director of Education rejected her pension proposal on the ground that her earlier part‑time service did not qualify for the Old Pension Scheme. The petitioner …
The petitioners sought to quash a revision order dated 21 November 2025 and to uphold an earlier order of the Sub‑Divisional Officer dated 17 March 2025 concerning a land acquisition matter. The respondents pointed out that a civil suit filed by the petitioners for declaration of title had been …
The petitioners sought to quash a revision order dated 21 November 2025 and to uphold an earlier order of the Sub‑Divisional Officer dated 17 March 2025 concerning a land acquisition matter. The respondents pointed out that a civil suit filed by the petitioners for declaration of title had been …
The High Court of Bombay, on 7 September 2026, listed the pending writ petitions for final disposal. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed in the order. The court simply directed that the petitions be taken up for final determination. No reasoning or detailed outcome beyond the …
The petitioner sought to quash a regularisation certificate issued by the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation for a structure allegedly built on land earmarked as a development‑plan (DP) road, and to have the building demolished. The petition relied on Section 4(1) of the Regularisation of Unauthorised …
The High Court of Bombay, on 7 September 2026, listed the pending writ petitions for final disposal. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed in the order. The court simply directed that the petitions be taken up for final determination. No reasoning or detailed outcome beyond the …
Suresh Shamrao Shinde, convicted under sections 120(B), 385 and 34 of the IPC, appealed his conviction while the CBI appealed his acquittal in a Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime (MCOC) case. At the time of his 2015 arrest, several gold ornaments were seized and a panchanama was prepared. The …
Santosh Dashrath Patil filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petition and instead lodge a private complaint before a Judicial Magistrate, invoking the Supreme Court's …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Amit Suresh Shinde under CrPC Sec. 438 and B.N.S. Sec. 482 in connection with charges of causing a miscarriage and related offences. The prosecution alleged that Shinde instructed a doctor to induce a miscarriage without his wife's …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the Sub‑Divisional Officer’s order that set aside a Tahsildar’s order passed under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 directing respondents to remove an impediment in a road. The Tahsildar had ordered removal after a site …
Petitioner Michael Gabriel filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. He later applied for leave to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue an alternative legal remedy. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Shweta Rathod, moved the court for this withdrawal. The court …
The High Court heard applications for bail filed by four accused persons in separate bail applications (BA-1621-25, BA-1779-25, BA-2738-26, BA-4352-25). After the order dated 07.09.2026 was pronounced, the applicant’s counsel filed a praecipe on 08.09.2026 seeking correction of a clerical error – …
The appellant, Mr. A. K. Choudhary, died during the pendency of First Appeal No. 548 of 2013. An interim application was filed seeking the impleadment of his legal heirs. No opposition was filed against the application. The Court, finding no impediment, allowed the interim application, directing …
The applicant, representing the legal heirs of the deceased Mrs. Anita Dominic D’Souza, filed a Civil Revision Application No. 280 of 2022 in the High Court of Bombay. The applicant later communicated a request to withdraw the revision application, which was placed on record. The court, after …
Sameena Shaikh filed Writ Petition No.1202 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the application, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No …
The High Court heard applications for bail filed by four accused persons in separate bail applications (BA-1621-25, BA-1779-25, BA-2738-26, BA-4352-25). After the order dated 07.09.2026 was pronounced, the applicant’s counsel filed a praecipe on 08.09.2026 seeking correction of a clerical error – …
Dr. Anil Shantilal Modi (HUF) filed a writ petition (No.1198 of 2021) in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Police Inspector and others. The petition was presented before a bench comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel informed …
The petitioner, Jeewan Devram Shirsath, filed a criminal writ petition seeking furlough leave from custody. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that his mother was ill, prompting the respondent State to grant him parole for 40 days on 5 September 2026. The court observed that since parole …
The petitioner, Chhaya Jitendra Mohite, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Senior Inspector of Police to withdraw a communication dated 11 December 2020, which had directed her to approach a civil court because her complaint was deemed …
Shri Shankar Muktaji Gavhane filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner could not be served at the address on record, and the court noted a non‑prosecution situation. The petitioner’s counsel later produced a postal report indicating that the petitioner's address corresponded to …
The petitioners challenged their disqualification as managing committee members of a cooperative society, ordered by the Deputy Registrar under Sections 75(5) and 78A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The Deputy Registrar had issued a show‑cause notice limited to the audit …
Mukesh Devnarayan Tiwari filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5 March 2026 passed by the respondents after a show‑cause notice. The petitioner argued that the order failed to address any of his contentions and that the show‑cause notice was vague. The High Court examined the order and …
The appellants, represented by Mangesh Kokare on behalf of Zaid Ansari & Associates, were ordered to file a vakalatnama to confirm their instructions to appear before the court. The court had previously directed that no further time would be granted beyond 7 September 2026. On the stated date, the …
The applicant, Anil Shivajirao Bhosale, a director of a cooperative bank and former legislator, sought modification of clause (b) in the bail order dated 19.08.2024, which required him to report to the police station. The State, through Prosecutor Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, opposed the relaxation, …
The petitioner challenged an order dated 7 April 2026 passed by the Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) which dismissed an appeal against an order of the Appellate Authority dated 27 October 2025. The petitioner argued that the GRC failed to record any independent reasons and merely endorsed the …
The petitioner challenged an order dated 1 April 2026 passed by the Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) which had dismissed an appeal against an order of the Appellate Authority dated 27 October 2025. The petitioner argued that the GRC had not recorded any independent reasons and merely endorsed the …
