Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Judgments of 2026

20841 judgments · newest first · showing 13801–14000

MOHAMMED JAMAL MD RAEES KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Mohammed Jamel Mohd. Raees Khan, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. The prosecution indicated that only two witnesses – the Medical Officer and the Investigating Officer – remained to be examined, with their testimony scheduled for 21 September 2026, after …

VISHAL KALASARIA AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The petitioners, owners of several ready‑mix concrete plants, challenged FIR No.0287/2025 filed by a Village Revenue Officer alleging illegal operation and pollution under sections 223, 270, 279 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. They contended that the plants possessed all required licences and that, …

NAYAN SADANAND UTEKARversusDIPTI NAYAN UTEKAR ALIAS DIPTI BANE

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking direction to the trial court to dispose of a matter pending since 2020. The respondent opposed, suggesting the petition be disposed if the trial court is directed to conclude the case within one year while keeping both parties' contentions open. The High …

RANI SUBHASH TAYADE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The parties, neighbours in a housing society, got into a verbal altercation over the lighting of a lamp, which escalated into cross complaints and FIRs being lodged against each other. Both parties later reconciled and submitted affidavits of consent seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings. The …

VIJAYLAXMI AMIT BALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Vijaylaxmi Amit Bali, sought quashing of two criminal complaints filed by her husband under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The complaints (CR No.353/2019 and FIR No.470/2021) alleged offences such as cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. The parties reconciled and …

SARIKA PANKAJ KADAM AND ANRversusPANKAJ BALASAHEB KADAM AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Sarika Pankaj Kadam and her 11-year-old daughter, challenged a Family Court order that granted only Rs.8,000 per month as maintenance to the minor daughter and none to the mother. The petitioner argued that she earns a modest salary of Rs.61,000 per month, has rental income, and …

MUKTSIM ISLAHUDDIN BAIGversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Muktsim Isluhaddin Baig applied for anticipatory bail in a case where he was alleged to have held the victim’s hands during an assault involving a bamboo stick and knife. The FIR charges him under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sahnita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, but the …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIversusDATTATRAY TUKARAM RANE

Disposed Off

The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) filed a series of writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling and Appellate Authorities that directed payment of interest on delayed gratuity to its retired employees. While BEST does not dispute paying the gratuity itself, …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH G MversusVILASRAO BAPURAO METKARI

Disposed Off

The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) filed a series of writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling and Appellate Authorities that directed payment of interest on delayed gratuity to its retired employees. While BEST does not dispute paying the gratuity itself, …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH G MversusPHILIP ANTHONY KINNY

Disposed Off

The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) filed a series of writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling and Appellate Authorities that directed payment of interest on delayed gratuity to its retired employees. While BEST does not dispute paying the gratuity itself, …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH G MversusRAVINDRA KRISHNA SHETYE

Disposed Off

The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) filed a series of writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling and Appellate Authorities that directed payment of interest on delayed gratuity to its retired employees. While BEST does not dispute paying the gratuity itself, …

SANJAY HARISHCHANDRA BANSALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellant, Sanjay H. Bansal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for an offence under Section 498-A of the IPC and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment. He filed a criminal appeal (No. 981 of 2001) challenging the conviction. During the pendency of the appeal, the …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THRU. G MversusMEGHSHYAM NARAYAN PARAB

Disposed Off

The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) filed a series of writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling and Appellate Authorities that directed payment of interest on delayed gratuity to its retired employees. While BEST does not dispute paying the gratuity itself, …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THRU. G MversusKALYANRAO RAMDAS SAKUNDE

Disposed Off

The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) filed a series of writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling and Appellate Authorities that directed payment of interest on delayed gratuity to its retired employees. While BEST does not dispute paying the gratuity itself, …

YOGESH S/O RAMBHAU RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

Yogesh Rathod applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the POCSO Act, 2012 for alleged false promise of marriage and sexual relations. The complainant, originally the alleged victim, filed an affidavit stating that she had married the …

PRABHAKAR SHRIDHAR GADHE AND ORSversusDEVENDRA YUVRAJ PATIL AND ORS

Disposed Off

The applicants, Prabhakar Shridhar Gadhe and others, filed an interim application in Writ Petition No. 779 of 2025 seeking relief. The learned counsel for the applicants argued for the restoration of the writ petition to the court file. The Government Pleader for the respondents raised no objection …

RAMESH RAMCHANDRA KALYANKER AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants, Ramesh Kalyankar and family, were charged under IPC sections 420 and 34 for allegedly selling a mortgaged property to Sohil Intikhab Alam Hawaldar despite knowing of the mortgage. The parties later reached a settlement and agreed to file a writ petition to quash the FIR, also seeking …

MANOHAR ARUNACHALAM MARUTHUVARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The case involves alleged misappropriation of Rs.122 crore from New India Co-operative Bank by its General Manager, Hitesh Mehta, who is accused of distributing the funds to several co‑accused, including Arunachalam (A6) and his son Manohar (A4). The prosecution alleges that A6 received Rs.40 crore …

RAMABAI RAMAJI MALI (DEC) BY LRS.versusSANTOSH KASHINATH PILENA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged the order of the President of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 20‑08‑2013 in Tenancy Revision No. 5/B/2010, which had set aside earlier orders deleting the names of certain persons as agricultural tenants. The earlier orders, based on a tenancy case filed under …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH G MversusARVIND PINGLE

Disposed Off

The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) filed a series of writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling and Appellate Authorities that directed payment of interest on delayed gratuity at rates higher than 6% per annum. BEST accepted liability to pay gratuity but …

BHARATI SAHAKARI BANK LTD.versusHARISHCHANDRA RAMCHANDRA PIMPUTKAR AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Bharati Sahakari Bank Ltd., challenged a revisional order that had mistakenly treated a no‑dues certificate for a Rs.2,00,000 loan to M/s. Mahalaxmi Car Accessories as proof of repayment for a separate Rs.6,00,000 loan to Mr. Harishchandra Pimputkar. The bank sought a fresh …

SATISH NARAYAN SONIversusDipak Nagendra Singh

Disposed Off

The applicant, Satish Narayan Soni, sought restoration of a leave to appeal that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution on 17‑12‑2025. The restoration application was filed 31 days late. The applicant’s counsel argued that the delay was due to the advocate’s illness, supported by medical documents. …

ARIJIT MUKHERJEEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The case involves three accused—Dickson Alex (A2), Arijit Mukherjee (A1), and Anthony Chijioke Nweke (A3)—charged under the NDPS Act for possession of 2,485 grams of cocaine seized from A1 at Mumbai airport. The prosecution alleges that A2 and A3 facilitated the smuggling through financial …

Hanumant Raghunath KadamversusKailas Buasaheb Garade

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought to challenge a mutation entry made in 1970 in their favour, based on a sale deed dated 20 October 1970, after a delay of more than 50 years. The respondents argued that the sale deed, being for Rs.99/-, did not require registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, …

NAVINA DINESH SHETTYversusSHAIKH AYUB REHMAN and ANR.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Navina Dinesh Shetty, challenged a 2003 appellate decree that reversed a trial court's finding that she was a tenant of a commercial shop and instead held her to be a mere licensee, ordering her to vacate and pay Rs.2,000 per month. The core issue was whether the caretaker agreements …

NAVINA DINESH SHETTYversusSHAIKH AYUB REHMAN

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Navina Dinesh Shetty, challenged a 2003 appellate decree that reversed a trial court's finding that she was a tenant of a commercial shop and instead held her to be a mere licensee, ordering her to vacate and pay Rs.2,000 per month. The core dispute centered on whether the 1994 and …

YASH NENSEE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioners, three young students, were charged under IPC sections 323, 324 and 34 for a simple injury that occurred during a New Year house party, where a mistaken‑identity slap led to a scuffle. They filed a writ petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 …

KUMAR KRUSHNA PILLAIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Allowed

Petitioner Kumar Krushna Pillai filed Writ Petition No. 1284 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State appeared before the Court. On 3 September 2026 the petitioner filed a praecipe seeking to withdraw the petition. The Court …

NILESH DATTATRAYA JEJURARKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, a psychiatrist, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged abetment of suicide under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant harassed his wife, insulted her at a family …

MAHALAKSHMI GLASS WORKS PVT. LTD.versusSUNIL V. MAGAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

Mahalakshmi Glass Works Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) sought to close its glass‑container factory in Mumbai and obtained permission from the Labour Commissioner in 2006. A recognised union (Bhartiya Kamgar Sena) and other workers filed applications for review, leading the State Government to refer the …

SHREYANSH MOTILAL GADAversusHEENA SHREYANSH GADA

Disposed Off

The husband (Petitioner) and wife (Respondent) each filed writ petitions challenging a maintenance order passed by the Family Judge, which required the husband to pay Rs.15,000 monthly for the minor son, Rs.30,000 as house rent to the wife, and Rs.30,000 for the son's education. The husband argued …

DHIRAJ SURESH TIWARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

During the pendency of Criminal Appeal No. 302 of 2026, the prosecution filed a charge‑sheet against the appellant, Dhiraj Suresh Tiwari. The appellant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal and to file an application for regular bail before the Special Court/Trial Court. The Court …

KALYAN DOMBIVLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANRversusNANDKISHOR GOVIND SANE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petition challenged the Industrial Court’s order dated 13 February 2013 which had fixed the quantum of amounts payable to ten employees of Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation without detailed reasoning. The High Court observed that the corporation had failed to produce any material to dispute …

HARSHAL PRATAP RAUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Harshal Pratap Raut appealed against the State of Maharashtra. While the appeal was pending, the prosecution filed a charge‑sheet. The appellant, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the appeal and to file an application for regular bail before the Special Court/Trial Court. The Court …

SANTOSH TUKARAM RATHODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Santosh Tukaram Rathod appealed against the State of Maharashtra. While the appeal was pending, the prosecution filed a charge‑sheet. The appellant, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the appeal and to file a regular bail application before the Special Court/Trial Court. The Court …

VANITA RAMKUMAR MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Vanita Ramkumar Mali appealed against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the appeal, the prosecution filed a charge‑sheet. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal and to file an application for regular bail before the Special Court/Trial Court. The Court …

BHAGAT SINGH ANANT VISHWASRAOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The appellant, Bhagat Singh Anant Vishwasrao, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. While the appeal was pending, the prosecution lodged a charge‑sheet. The appellant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal and to file an application for regular bail before the Special …

ANIL TUKARAM BANKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Appellant Anil Tukaram Bankar filed a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the appeal, the prosecution lodged a charge‑sheet. The appellant, through counsel, sought permission to withdraw the appeal and to file an application for regular bail before the Special …

PRAVIN BHAGWANRAO JADHAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The appellant, Pravin Bhagwanrao Jadhav, appealed against the State of Maharashtra. While the appeal was pending, the prosecution filed a charge‑sheet. The appellant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal and to file a regular bail application before the Special Court/Trial Court. The …

SHAMBHU DHONDIRAM PAWARversusTHE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND ORS

Disposed Off

Shambhu Dhondiram Pawar filed a writ petition challenging an action/communication dated 24 July 2023, claiming he only became aware of it in December 2025. The petitioner sought expeditious consideration of an application he filed on 19 January 2026 before the Inspector General of Registration, …

MOHD. AKHTAR RAJA MOHD. ISRAIL ANSARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellants, Mohd. Akhtar Raja Mohd. Israil Ansari and Abdul Hamid Abdul Latif Qureshi, were convicted by a Sessions Judge for robbery under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. They filed interim applications seeking suspension of the …

ABDUL HAMID ABDUL LATIF QURESHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellants, Mohd. Akhtar Raja Mohd. Israil Ansari and Abdul Hamid Abdul Latif Qureshi, were convicted by a Sessions Judge of an offence under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting two informants and stealing Rs.1,90,000 on 15 March 2016. They appealed the …

ABDUL HAMID ABDUL LATIF QURESHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellants, Mohd. Akhtar Raja Mohd. Israil Ansari and Abdul Hamid Abdul Latif Qureshi, were convicted by a Sessions Judge of an offence under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting two informants and stealing Rs.1,90,000 on 15 March 2016. They appealed the …

MOHD. AKHTAR RAJA MOHD. ISRAIL ANSARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The appellants, Mohd. Akhtar Raja Mohd. Israil Ansari and Abdul Hamid Abdul Latif Qureshi, were convicted by a Sessions Judge of an offence under Section 394 read with Section 34 of the IPC for allegedly assaulting two informants and stealing Rs.1,90,000 on 15 March 2016. They appealed the …

RUPALI CHETAN MASURKARversusCHETAN GAJANANRAO MASURKAR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Rupali Chetan Masurkar, filed a writ petition challenging the Family Court, Pune's order rejecting her maintenance application on the basis that she allegedly left her job to claim maintenance. The petitioner argued that she was unemployed at the time of filing and that the court …

Suresh Mohanlal SharmaversusThe State of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The petitioners alleged that their land was used by the municipal corporation for road construction between 2014 and 2016 without any acquisition proceeding or compensation. The corporation claimed it had deposited Rs 7.01 crore with the Special Land Acquisition Officer for compensation of all …

ULAHANATHAN ARUNACHALAM @ARUN BHAIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The case involves a massive bank fraud where the General Manager of New India Co-operative Bank allegedly siphoned Rs.122 crore and distributed large sums to co‑accused, including Rs.40 crore to Arunachalam (A6) and Rs.33‑40 crore to Manohar Arunachalam Maruthuvar (A4). The prosecution alleged that …

JITENDRASINGH MOHANSINGH KALSIversusTHE UNION OF INDIA

Allowed

The applicant, Vasant Anandrao Idhol, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 135 of the Customs Act, seeking confirmation of interim protection previously granted on 12 April 2024. The court noted that a show‑cause notice under Section 28(4) read with Section 124 of the Customs Act had …

CURSINO JUDE AGNELO CASTELLINOversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought consent quashing of FIR No.19/2026 and the accompanying charge‑sheet relating to cheque‑dishonour allegations arising from a land transaction, after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Both applicants filed separate criminal applications before the Bombay High Court, …

MOHINI ALIAS SHANKUNTALA KALU SHETTYversusPANDURANG ANANT RANE AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, Mohini alias Shankuntala Kalu Shetty, filed a writ petition challenging a lower court order that had refused to recast the issue in a landlord‑tenant suit. The original issue framed was whether the plaintiff proved he was the landlord of the premises comprising Shop Nos.1‑3 at Rane …

RAVI BARKU GAWLI in Appeal 625/2024versusTHE STATE OFF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Ravi Barku Gawli filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the appellate court. The applicant's counsel offered to deposit twenty percent of the cheque amount within eight weeks and sought permission to proceed with the revision. The court considered …

MANOHAR NARKARversusFORMAC ENGINEERING LTD AND ORS

Rejected

Manohar Narkar, a former employee of Formac Engineering Ltd., challenged his termination and the award of compensation by the Industrial Court. The Industrial Court had found the departmental enquiry fair but held that the charges were unproved, deeming the dismissal illegal and awarding Rs.3,00,000 …

MUKESH WAGATLAL SIYAALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, a jeweller, challenged an FIR and charge‑sheet filed under Sections 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code alleging criminal intimidation, wrongful confinement and criminal intimidation. He claimed that a police constable had illegally seized his driving licence, demanded a bribe, …

VASANTRAO WAMANRAO MOREYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

Petitioner Vasantrao Morey, a builder, obtained housing loans totalling Rs 18.75 lakh from Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) for five borrowers, allegedly using forged documents. An FIR was lodged under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B of the IPC. The petitioner repaid the entire loan amount, …

HABIBULLA KARIM KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, convicted of murder under IPC s.302 and sentenced to life imprisonment, filed Criminal Appeal No.186 of 2017. During the appeal he sought to raise a plea of juvenility via Interim Application No.3138 of 2025, which was withdrawn on 18.09.2025 without merits being considered. The …

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER NASHIKversusTHE DIRECTOR/MANAGER

Disposed Off

The Assistant Commissioner of Nashik Municipal Corporation sought leave to challenge a magistrate’s order dismissing a complaint against the Director/Manager of Mobile Telecommunication Ltd for default. The complaint, filed under Sections 398, 399 and 481 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusANAND GANPAT SALVE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an application seeking leave to appeal (ALS(ST) No. 10651 of 2026) but filed it nine days after the prescribed period. The State moved for condonation of this delay, arguing that sufficient cause existed. The respondent opposed, contending that the delay was not …

ANMOL ATUL JADHARAOversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The High Court considered an interim application by Anmol Atul Jadharao seeking suspension of his five‑year sentence and bail after being convicted under Section 307 IPC for an attempted murder on a college student. The appellant argued that medical evidence cast doubt on the grievous nature of the …

VAIBHAV GAJANAN UBALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Vaibhav Gajanan Ubale, who was arrested on 5 February 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 3, 4, 5 read with 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 135 of the Maharashtra …

YOGESH PRAKASH PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Yogesh Prakash Patil, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, citing the applicant's father's serious illness. The court noted that the withdrawal was permissible and that the applicant …

SHADAB SAJJAD AHMAD SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Shadab Sajjad Ahmad Shaikh, was arrested on 3 July 2026 while an anticipatory bail application was pending before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant, through counsel Adv. Ulkesh Gangurde, filed a request to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on the ground of his arrest. …

HUSSAIN ABDUL KADER KUNNALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Hussain Abdul Kader Kunnali, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The Court earlier ordered him to surrender his passport and report to the investigating officer on 6 July 2026. The applicant failed to comply with both directions and offered no …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRINKUSINGH SHIVBAKAS SINGH

Disposed Off

The State of Maharashtra filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal of Navnath Waghmare by the Designated Special Court in a POCSO case where the victim, a minor, alleged rape. The trial court acquitted the accused on the basis that the victim's age was not conclusively proved …

GAUTAM KHANDJUAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Navnath Waghmare was engaged to Nafisa Joseph, who demanded proof of his earlier divorce. Waghmare refused to produce the documents, leading to a quarrel witnessed by both families. The next day, Nafisa, in a depressed state, locked herself in a room and committed suicide by hanging. Waghmare was …

LT. COL. VIJAY KUMAR GAUTAMversusOLYMPIC TOWER CO OP HSG. SOC LTD. AND ORS

Disposed Off

Lt. Col Vijay Kumar Gautam (retd) filed a writ petition seeking the High Court to direct the Co-operative Court, Mumbai, to dispose of thirteen disputes he had filed between 2019 and 2023 within three months. The petitioner alleged grievances regarding his membership in Olympic Tower Co‑op. Housing …

CHHAYA ASHOK KUMAR PURWARversusTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought a court direction for the renewal of their passports for a ten‑year period, challenging the earlier order that permitted only a five‑year renewal while their criminal appeals were pending. The court noted that under the Passport Rules, 1980, passports for individuals above …

ASHOK KUMAR PURWARversusTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought a court direction for the renewal of their passports for a ten‑year period, challenging the earlier order that permitted only a five‑year renewal while their criminal appeals were pending. The court noted that under the Passport Rules, 1980, passports for individuals above …

SHIVDAS DASHRATH GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. GP

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought enforcement of a demolition order dated 10 February 2017 issued by the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Authority under Section 478 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, directing demolition of unauthorized construction within 15 days. The Authority claimed it …

OMKAR BALKRUSHNA GADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by two brothers arrested for alleged offences under Sections 140(3), 311 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicants argued that the police violated …

VINOD HARIBHAU KASKAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicants were convicted under Sections 353 and 332 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. They had been on bail during the trial and were released on bail after conviction. The applicants filed an interim application seeking …

JYOTI D/O JALINDAR GIAKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Jyoti D/o Jalindar Gaikwad, challenged the Scheduled Tribes Certificate Scrutiny Committee’s order rejecting her claim to Thakar Scheduled Tribe status, arguing that her sister Yogita, a close blood relative, had already been issued a valid certificate of validity. The petitioner …

AJAY BHAGWANDAS PESWANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences under Section 123 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 65(c), (e) and (f) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The applicant, a grocery shop …

STANDARD CHARTERED BANKversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioner, Standard Chartered Bank, filed a writ petition seeking relief as a secured creditor. After obtaining physical possession of the subject property under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, the bank …

MAYURESH AJIT GAMBHIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Mayuresh Ajit Gambhir was arrested in connection with CR No. 21 of 2016, but the grounds of his arrest were not communicated to him as required by the Constitution and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; instead, only his mother signed the intimation letter. The applicant’s counsel argued that this …

SHRADDHA DINESH KADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY,

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Shraddha Dinesh Kad and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court and subsequently a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, had breached a court order. The court examined whether the alleged breach persisted. Evidence …

FIT (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S. FRANCE INTERNATIONAL TRADE) THR.POA MANOJ A.I.versusPARAG MILK FOODS PVT. LTD.,(EARLIER KNOWN AS PARAG MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS PVT.LTD., PUNE)

Disposed Off

The appellant, FIT (formerly M/s. France International Trade), filed a suit in Pune seeking recovery of Rs.5.03 crore based on a credit note, asserting that the Pune court had jurisdiction despite a clause in the parties' draft agreement designating the Geneva court as the forum. The trial court …

ABHISHEK SUBHASHCHANDRA TIWARIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Abhishek Subhashchandra Tiwari filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The court, after hearing arguments, was not inclined to grant bail. The applicant's counsel then sought permission to withdraw the application. The court allowed the …

DEEPAK ISHWARIPRASAD AGARWALversusM/S. AJINKYA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTS.

Allowed

Deepak Ishwariprasad Agarwal filed Civil Revision Application No.170/2026 but failed to comply with the Court's order to amend the pleadings by furnishing new names and addresses, leading to its dismissal for non‑compliance. The applicant subsequently filed Interim Application No.7043/2026 seeking …

ZAKIR SIRAJ IRANIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Zakir Siraj Irani was convicted under IPC sections 394, 506(2) read with 34 and MCOC Act sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2) and 3(4), receiving five years on each count, two years on the intimidation charge and a total fine of Rs.15,30,000. He has completed the substantive imprisonment but remains incarcerated …

SAIYED MOHAMMAD SHAZAR AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED

The applicants were charged under Section 318(4) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly cheating a complainant in a property sale by receiving Rs. 93,00,000 and initially returning Rs. 12,00,000. The complainant claimed the remaining Rs. 81,00,000 was not returned, …

DILIP PANDURANG SURYAVANSHIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered an interim application filed by the original complainant seeking to intervene in an anticipatory bail application (No. 1940 of 2026) filed by Ashok Kumar Shetty. The complainant argued for the right to assist the prosecution. The Court held that a complainant may intervene …

SAGAR MITHILESH SAROJversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed To be withdrawn

The applicant, Sagar Mithilesh Saroj, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The learned counsel for the applicant expressed a desire to withdraw the bail application and sought leave to file a different appropriate application. The Court, after noting its disinclination to entertain …

SANTOSHKUMAR RAMESHSING THAKURversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Santoshkumar Rameshsing Thakur filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 20 August 2026 and continued to be absent thereafter. The court observed that the …

WP/10905/2004 of KU. PUSHPASHILA PUNJABRAO BHUYAR Vs

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Ku. Pushpashila, challenged a 2004 order of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee that invalidated her claim to belong to the ‘Thakur’ Scheduled Tribe. She relied on a 2023 High Court decision (Writ Petition No.929 of 2018) which held that validity certificates of close blood …

BHARAT TALAKSHI VORA AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

Petitioners Bharat Talakshi Vora and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. They later instructed their counsel to withdraw the petition and instead file a discharge application before the trial court. The respondent State of Maharashtra, through its APP, opposed …

MAHALAKSHMI GLASS WORKS PVT. LTD.versusSUNIL V. MAGAR AND ORS

Disposed Off

Mahalakshmi Glass Works Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) sought to close its glass‑container factory in Mumbai and obtained permission from the Labour Commissioner in 2006. A recognised union (Bhartiya Kamgar Sena) and other workers filed applications for review, leading the State Government to refer the …

DEVENDRA DATTATRAY DAHIPHALEversusSHRUTI DEVENDRA DAHIPHALE

Disposed Off

Petitioner Devendra Dattatray Dahiphale filed writ petition No. 12980 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court challenging a matter involving respondent Shruti Devendra Dahiphale. The respondent was impleaded in the proceedings. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, on instructions, moved the …

GULAB SOPANA GOREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS DEPT OF MARKETING AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a registered lessee of market stalls (Gala Nos. 33 and 34) in Mahatma Phule Market Yard, learned in February 2025 that the stalls had been transferred to other respondents without notice. He challenged the transfer under Section 43 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing …

ROY JALAL JAFFARBHAIversusAUTHORISED OFFICER BANK OF BARODA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, an auction purchaser, filed a writ petition challenging a status‑quo order imposed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) on his appeal pending since 2023. He had deposited the full bid amount in 2022 and obtained a sale certificate, but could not enjoy the property due to …

BADAR SINGHversusBANK OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, an auction purchaser, deposited ₹41,85,000 with the bank and obtained a sale certificate on 11‑02‑2025, but subsequent interim relief granted by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) prevented him from taking possession. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a refund of the …

Rajendra Ramchandra GhodvindeversusThe Transport Manager AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged orders of the Industrial Court, Thane, which upheld show‑cause notices issued by their employer for imposing further penalties after they had already been subjected to two prior disciplinary actions. They argued that the earlier recovery of excess salary and their …

Jitendra Laxman GovekarversusThe Transport Manager AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged orders of the Industrial Court, Thane, which upheld show‑cause notices for imposing a third penalty after they had already faced two disciplinary actions. They argued that the earlier recovery of excess salary and a suspension constituted punishments, thereby barring any …

PRAMOD CHANDRAKANT MUNDHEversusThe Transport Manager

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged orders of the Industrial Court, Thane, which upheld show‑cause notices issued by their employer for imposing further penalties after they had already been subjected to two prior disciplinary actions. They argued that the earlier recovery of excess salary and their …

Jaywant Shrirang ChavanversusThe Transport Manager

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged orders of the Industrial Court, Thane, which upheld show‑cause notices for imposing a third penalty after they had already faced two disciplinary actions. They argued that the earlier recovery of excess salary and a suspension constituted punishments, thereby barring any …

Dinesh Keshav ChoudhariversusThe Transport Manager

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged orders of the Industrial Court, Thane, which upheld show‑cause notices issued by their employer for imposing further penalties after they had already been subjected to two prior disciplinary actions. They argued that the earlier recovery of excess salary and their …

Ranjit Sambhaji NimbalkarversusThe Transport Manager

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged orders of the Industrial Court, Thane, which upheld show‑cause notices issued by their employer for imposing further penalties after they had already been subjected to two prior disciplinary actions. They argued that the earlier recovery of excess salary and their …

BABAR AGRO PRODUCTSversusUNION BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a borrower, filed a writ petition seeking urgent interim relief before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) but was unable to proceed without a waiver of the pre‑deposit requirement. The petitioner had already deposited Rs. 37.5 lakh as 25% pre‑deposit, and the DRAT had listed …

INDERJIT SINGH MATHARUversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

Inderjit Singh Matharu filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. After the filing of a charge-sheet, his counsel, Mr. Siddhant Raul, sought leave to withdraw the bail application and requested liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court. The Court, after …

RAJASHRI PRAVIN PATIL AND ORSversusCIDCO LTD. AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition against CIDCO Ltd. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the petitioners’ request for leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were addressed. The order was …

LATA RAVINDRA SHINDEversusCHHAYA KETAN MEHTA AND ANR.

Allowed

Four writ petitions (Nos. 4720-4723 of 2019) were filed in the Bombay High Court by Lata Ravindra Shinde and Ravindra Shankarrao Shinde against Chhaya Ketan Mehta, Ketan Mehta (HUF) and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Rajesh Singh, while the State was represented by Ms. Rajeshree V. …

RAVINDRA SHANKARRAO SHINDEversusKETAN MEHTA (HUF) AND ANR.

Allowed

Four writ petitions (Nos. 4720-4723 of 2019) were filed in the Bombay High Court by Lata Ravindra Shinde and Ravindra Shankarrao Shinde against Chhaya Ketan Mehta, Ketan Mehta (HUF) and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Rajesh Singh, while the State was represented by Ms. Rajeshree V. …

LATA RAVINDRA SHINDEversusKETAN MEHTA AND ANR.

Allowed

Four writ petitions (Nos. 4720-4723 of 2019) were filed in the Bombay High Court by Lata Ravindra Shinde and Ravindra Shankarrao Shinde against Chhaya Ketan Mehta, Ketan Mehta (HUF) and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Rajesh Singh, while the State was represented by Ms. Rajeshree V. …

RAVINDRA SHANKARRAO SHINDEversusKETAN MEHTA (HUF) AND ANR.

Allowed

Four writ petitions (Nos. 4720-4723 of 2019) were filed in the Bombay High Court by Lata Ravindra Shinde and Ravindra Shankarrao Shinde against Chhaya Ketan Mehta, Ketan Mehta (HUF) and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Rajesh Singh, while the State was represented by Ms. Rajeshree V. …

SOMNATH KACHOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

Somnath Kachole applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a FIR alleging that he, along with co‑accused, assaulted two persons with iron rods, wooden logs, a sickle and an iron spade on 29 May 2026, causing multiple injuries …

XYZversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The appellant XYZ filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging a conviction by the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, the appellant, present in court, instructed his counsel, Mr. Santosh Mahamuni, to seek leave to withdraw the appeal. The court granted the leave and …

ASHA HITESH KOTHARIversusHITESH K KOTHARI

Disposed off as Withdrawn

The applicant, Asha Hitesh Kothari, filed a criminal application seeking cancellation of an anticipatory bail order previously granted. The trial in the underlying case had progressed to the stage of judgment. Counsel for the applicant requested permission to withdraw the cancellation application, …

TELEBUILD CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Telebuild Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, all pending …

DIPAK PRAHLAD GHOGAREversusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Dipak Prahlad Ghogare, was appointed as a teacher in a Pune school in December 2018 and received approval for his appointment in August 2019. The school management later sought a Shalarth ID for the petitioner to enable salary payment, but the initial proposal was rejected due to …

RAHUL CHANDRAKANT KARANDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The appellant, Rahul Chandrakant Karande, was convicted by a Sessions Court of offences under Sections 353, 332 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 122 and 177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, receiving a two‑year rigorous imprisonment and fines. He filed an interim application seeking …

Shashikant Popat ShardulversusThe State Of Maharashtra

Disposed Off

The applicant was convicted under Section 3 read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and sentenced to three months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,000, which was confirmed by the Sessions Judge. He had been on bail during the trial and had been in custody for five days pending the …

AAKIB BADSHAH MALIKversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The applicant, Aakib Badshah Malik, filed a criminal application seeking to quash the trial court's order dated 07.09.2026 which rejected his request for blanket permission to travel to ten foreign countries for six months on the ground that no detailed itinerary was provided. The trial court had …

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTDversusMR. VIKRAM TRIVEDI AND ANR

Disposed Off

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Mr. Vikram Trivedi and another. The petitioner failed to appear before the court, even on the date of hearing on 20 July 2026. The court observed that the petitioner had lost interest in prosecuting the petition. …

ANTHONY CHIJIOKE NWEKEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The case involves three accused—Dickson Alex (A2), Arijit Mukherjee (A1), and Anthony Chijioke Nweke (A3)—charged under the NDPS Act for possession of 2,485 grams of cocaine seized from A1 at Mumbai airport. The prosecution alleges that A2 and A3 facilitated the smuggling through financial …

WASIM ABDUL GANI SHAIKHversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS

Disposed Off

Wasim Abdul Gani Shaikh filed a criminal writ petition challenging a detention order dated 25‑10‑2024. The petition remained pending through 2025 with no representation for the petitioner. The Assistant Public Prosecutor informed the court that the period of detention had already expired and that …

SONALI TRUSHANT WALDEversusDHANANJAY PUNDALIK CHOUDHARI

Disposed Off

Petitioner Sonali Trushant Walde filed a writ petition against respondent Dhananjay Pundalik Choudhari in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infractuous. The Court considered this submission. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition as …

VIKASH SURESHCHANDRA PATHAKversusThe THE UNION TERRITORY OF DNH DAMAN AND DIU

Disposed Off

Vikash Sureshchandra Pathak was convicted under IPC sections 304(II) and 308, and Motor Vehicles Act section 185, and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. He has been in custody since July 2022 and has served over four years. The appellant sought suspension of the sentence and …

RAJENDRA SINGH V BHULLAR MAHARAJversusEXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Rajendra Singh, filed a writ petition challenging a bid settlement in which he had not participated. The court noted that the petitioner did not take part in the initial bidding process and that the bid had already been concluded. Consequently, the petition was found to have no …

DUDHARAM S/O BAGUJI HANWATEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The petitioner, Dudharam, filed Writ Petition No. 13193 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petitioner failed to attend any of the hearings, including the last one. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in prosecuting …

JITENDRA RAJARAM MHATREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GP AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners sought enforcement of a demolition order dated 10 February 2017 issued by the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Authority under Section 478 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, directing demolition of unauthorized construction within 15 days. The Authority claimed it …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIversusSATISH HARISHCHANDRA RANE

Disposed Off

The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) filed a series of writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling and Appellate Authorities that directed payment of interest on delayed gratuity to its retired employees. While BEST does not dispute paying the gratuity itself, …

PRAVESH SINGH @ SINH S/O PAHALAD SINGHversusVANDANA L LANDGE AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner challenged a Metropolitan Magistrate's order dated 9 June 2025 that rejected his application to cross‑examine the complainant under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He contended that the order was passed without considering that the accused’s evidence affidavit was …

Selsia Connel PereiraversusROSY B LOUIS

Disposed Off

The applicant filed an interim application seeking permission to withdraw rent/compensation that had been deposited with the Small Causes Court during pending eviction proceedings. The underlying civil revision application filed by the tenant had been dismissed for want of prosecution, confirming …

SMT. VANDANA SHIVAJI BOMBLEversusRAMBHAU YESHWANT BORASTE

Dismissed as Withdrawn

The appellant, Vandana Shivaji Bomble, filed a second appeal (No. 916 of 2022) before the High Court of Bombay against the respondents, including the estate of the deceased. During the hearing on 9 September 2026, the appellant’s counsel submitted a letter requesting withdrawal of the appeal. The …

SUMEET KUMAR NAYAKversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The applicant, Sumeet Kumar Nayak, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court. No counsel or the applicant appeared when the matter was called in the morning session. The court again listed the matter for the afternoon session, but again there was no appearance. The court noted that …

SALIM LAILASHA KALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Allowed To be withdrawn

The petitioner, Salim Lailasha Kale, filed a criminal writ petition seeking liberty to withdraw the petition and to subsequently file applications for remission and placement in an open prison due to health concerns. Counsel for the petitioner expressed a desire not to proceed with the petition at …

SATISH RAJMOHAN TANDONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the registration of an FIR based on a complaint lodged with the police. The High Court examined the maintainability of such a petition in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of …

DILIP DINANATH BHOIRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Dilip Dinanath Bhoir filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel faced technical difficulties during the hearing, and the respondent’s counsel argued that the relief sought in prayer clause (a) had already been granted by the …

BALASHEB SHANKAR BHANDAREversusHARISHCHANDRA SHANKAR BHANDARE

Disposed Off

The appellant, Balasaheb Shankar Bhandare, was Plaintiff No.2 in a 2015 suit filed by his mother seeking cancellation of a sale deed. He had expressly admitted before the trial court that he had no personal interest in the suit property and was merely supporting his mother. Despite this, he appealed …

SNEHAL PRAVIN DALALversusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Allowed To be withdrawn

The appellant, Snehal Pravin Dalal, filed an interim application seeking leave to withdraw his appeal against Order No. 154 of 2022 filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appellant also requested that the interim application itself be withdrawn. The matter was heard before Justice …

TEJPAL POONAMCHANDversusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OIF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANOTHER

Allowed To be withdrawn

The appellant, Tejpal Poonamchand Jain, filed an interim application seeking leave to withdraw his appeal against Order No. 156 of 2022 and the accompanying interim application. The sole issue before the court was whether the appellant could be permitted to withdraw the appeal and the interim …

MILAN LALITBHAI SHAHversusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

Allowed To be withdrawn

The appellant, Milan Lalitbhai Shah, filed an appeal against Order No. 155 of 2022 passed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and subsequently moved an interim application seeking leave to withdraw both the appeal and the interim application. The appellant was represented by Mr. Darshit …

BALASAHEB SHANKAR BHANDAREversusHARISHCHANDRA SHANKAR BHANDARE

Disposed Off

The appellant, Balasaheb Shankar Bhandare, was Plaintiff No.2 in a 2015 suit filed by his mother seeking cancellation of a sale deed. He had expressly admitted before the trial court that he had no personal interest in the suit property and was merely supporting his mother. Despite this, he appealed …

YOGESH JETHALAL JAINversusMITTAL YOGESH JAIN (GALA) @ MITTAL PRADEEP SANGOI

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged a Family Court order that granted Rs.30,000 per month maintenance to the respondent-wife and Rs.20,000 per month to their daughter, along with school fees, alleging that the court had not properly assessed his income and had ignored the respondent's undisclosed earnings. …

DIPAK PANDURANG MATALE AND ORSversusTUKARAM ANANDA MATALE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner challenged a 2 March 2009 order of the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Nashik, which rejected an application (Exhibit‑65) to amend the plaint. The suit had been stayed pending the writ petition, but after the Supreme Court’s decision in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency (P) Ltd. v. CBI, the …

MRS. RITA ASEEM SHARMAversusMR. ASEEM D SHARMA

Disposed Off

Petitioners Vaishali Aseem D Sharma and Rita Aseem Sharma filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against respondents Anil Tikam and Aseem D Sharma respectively. The petitions were filed without any supporting documents or detailed allegations, and no counsel appeared on …

SHRI.RAJESH MADHUKAR GAIKWADversusMADHUKAR KASHINATH GAIKWAD AND OTHERS

Disposed Off

The appellant, Rajesh Madhukar Gaikwad (deceased) represented by his legal heirs, filed several interim applications (including No.10172 of 2022, Civil Application No.1662 of 2018, and Interim Application (Stamp) No.22155 of 2025) in a second appeal (No.443 of 2019) to bring on record the legal …

VASANTHA RAVINDRANversusSAI APARTMENT CO-OP.HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. and ORS.

Disposed Off

Mrs. Vasantha Ravindran filed a writ petition seeking to quash several orders appointing an administrator to Sai Apartment Co‑op. Housing Society Ltd. The petition listed multiple exhibits and alleged procedural improprieties. No petitioner appeared before the court, and service of notice was …

RAJKUMAR BABURAO AATHWALE AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicants, Rajkumar Baburao Aathwale and another, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court in criminal appellate jurisdiction. The State of Maharashtra opposed the application. The matter was heard by Justice Milind N. Jadhav through video conferencing. The Court permitted the …

NEHA ENTERPRISES AND ANRversusM/S. SHRADDHA INVESTMENTS AND ANR

Disposed Off

Petitioners Neha Enterprises & Anr. and Gaurav Enterprises & Anr. filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of M/s Shraddha Investments & Anr. The petitions were filed in the criminal appellate jurisdiction. The petitioners argued that the petitions had become infructuous …

GAURAV ENTERPRISES AND ANRversusM/S. SHRADDHA INVESTMENTS AND ANR

Disposed Off

Petitioners Neha Enterprises & Anr. and Gaurav Enterprises & Anr. filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of M/s Shraddha Investments & Anr. The petitions were filed in the criminal appellate jurisdiction. The petitioners argued that the petitions had become infructuous …