Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MADEENUL HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off/Decided on merits

Holding

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution, and the interim order is vacated.

Summary

The applicant, Madeenul Hasan, filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 529 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. No representative appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, while counsel for the State was present. The Court observed that the application was not prosecuted and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated. The order was consigned to the records and the court directed that the trial court be informed of the dismissal.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate disposition of an application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. and Section 529 B.N.S.S., 2023 when it is not prosecuted and the applicant is absent?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure
  • Application Dismissal
  • Want of Prosecution
  • Interim Order Vacated
  • Section 483 Cr.P.C.
  • Section 529 B.N.S.S.

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                              LUCKNOW
                                                      APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 482 of 2025

                                     Madeenul Hasan
                                                                                                 .....Applicant(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                     State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt.
                                     Lko. And Another                                                 .....Opposite
                                                                                                            Party(s)

                                     Counsel for Applicant(s)                      :   Rudra Mani Shukla
                                     Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                 :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 14
                                                     HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out.

                                    2. None is present for the applicant to press this application.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the State is present.

                                    4. The application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./529 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is
                                    dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

                                    6. Consigned to records.

                                    7. Office is directed to communicate this order to the trial court concerned
                                    forthwith.


                                                                                        (Shree Prakash Singh,J.)
                                    September 10, 2025
                                    kanhaiya




Digitally signed by :-
KANHAIYA KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.