Allahabad High Court
NEERAJ KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
Holding
The court held that the applicant is entitled to bail and allowed the bail application.
Summary
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Maurya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing charges under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, asserted that he had been in custody since March 2, 2026, and highlighted that he was already on bail in three other related cases. The State opposed the bail, but the court examined the facts, the nature of the evidence, and the provisions of Section 19(4) of the B.N.S.S. without delving into the merits of the case. Finding the circumstances suitable for bail, the judge ordered release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions to prevent tampering with evidence or intimidation of witnesses. The order expressly limited its scope to the bail application and did not prejudice the trial court's independent assessment of the case.
Issues considered
- Whether bail can be granted under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an offence punishable under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act.
- Whether the applicant satisfies the criteria under Section 19(4) of the B.N.S.S. for bail despite the seriousness of the alleged offences.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 19(4), 351, 483
- Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act — s. 2, 3
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act
- Section 19(4)
- sureties
- witness intimidation
- trial court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13001 of 2026
Neeraj Kumar Maurya
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahendra Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. Heard Sri Mahendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant
and Sri Chandra Shekhar Saran, learned AGA for the State-
respondents and perused the record.
2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of
applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 04
of 2026, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial
Activities (Prevention) Act, registered at P.S. Ujhani, District
Budaun, during pendency of the trial.
3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that
applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this
case and he has been languishing in jail since 2.3.2026. It is
further submitted that the applicant is on bail in three cases shown
against him in the gang chart and apart from the above, he is
having no other case registered against him. It is further submitted
that the applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if
granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy
pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early
conclusion of trial.
4. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of
bail to the applicant.
BAIL No. 13001 of 2026
2
5. The applicant is on bail in three cases shown against him in the
gang chart and apart from the above, he is having no other case
registered against him.
6. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence
reflected from record and also taking into consideration the
provision of Section 19(4) of the Act and without expressing any
opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail.
Hence, the present bail application is ALLOWED.
7. Let the applicant- Neeraj Kumar Maurya involved in the
aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a
personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following
conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts
to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution
witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial
court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of
charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of
B.N.S.S.
(iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall
not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the
witnesses are present in the trial court.
(v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on
each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel.
8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a
ground for cancellation of bail.
BAIL No. 13001 of 2026
3
9. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the
purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way
be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial
court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent
conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything
said in this order.
(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)
April 20, 2026
Abhishek
Digitally signed by :-
ABHISHEK AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…