Allahabad High Court
RAVI KARANversusSTATE OF U.P.
- Decided
- Bench
- KRISHAN PAHAL
Holding
The court held that, on a prima facie basis, the applicant had established sufficient grounds for bail and therefore granted it.
Summary
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ravi Karan, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 64(2)F, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the IPC, alleged to involve misuse of dowry laws. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, being the brother‑in‑law of the victim, and that the dispute stemmed from a family quarrel and a pending divorce between the husband and wife. The State opposed bail, but the court found the applicant’s claim of false implication credible and noted his clean criminal record. Without expressing an opinion on the merits of the underlying criminal charges, the court held that the applicant had made out a prima facie case for bail. Accordingly, the court ordered his release on personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions of non‑tampering with evidence, non‑intimidation of witnesses and attendance before the trial court.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to bail during the pendency of trial under the relevant provisions of the IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.
- Whether the circumstances of false implication and family dispute justify the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — s. 64(2)F
- Indian Penal Code — s. 115(2), 351(2), 352
Subjects
- bail
- false implication
- dowry law misuse
- family dispute
- criminal procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41573 of 2025
Ravi Karan
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalit Kumar Misra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 65
(Sr. No.180 out of 277)
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Lalit Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun
Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed
on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.74 of 2025, under Sections 64(2)F,
115(2), 351(2), 352 BNS, Police Station Paschim Sarira, District
Kaushambi, during the pendency of trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is
absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The
applicant is brother-in-law of the victim and has been falsely implicated in
the case. It is a clear cut case of false implication and misuse of dowry laws
as the husband and wife duo are estranged and a divorce petition is pending
between them. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since
15.9.2025. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the
liberty of bail.
5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the
submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be
disputed.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by
learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into
BAIL No. 41573 of 2025
2
consideration the fact that applicant is the brother-in-law of the victim and
family dispute is going on between the husband and wife duo, and without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of
the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application
is allowed.
7. Let the applicant- Ravi Karan, be released on bail on furnishing a
personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned,
subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not
tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the
trial court as required.
8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations
herein shall not affect the trial on merits.
(Krishan Pahal,J.)
April 20, 2026
Vikas Verma
Digitally signed by :-
VIKAS VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…