Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGHversusANOOP KUMAR DISTT.INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS GONDA

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Holding

The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Shravan Kumar Singh, filed a civil contempt application against Anoop Kumar, District Inspector of Schools, Gonda. The matter was listed before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, but the petitioner's counsel, Saryu Prasad Tiwari, was absent and no request for adjournment was made. The court noted the absence of representation and the lack of any request to postpone the hearing. Consequently, the court dismissed the contempt application on the ground of want of prosecution. The notice, if any, was discharged and the matter was closed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt application can proceed in the absence of the petitioner's counsel and without a request for adjournment?

Subjects

  • civil contempt
  • procedural default
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • court procedure

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                   LUCKNOW

                                                CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2530 of 2018

                                     Shravan Kumar Singh
                                                                                                     .....Applicant(s)
                                                                         Versus
                                     Anoop Kumar Distt.Inspector Of Schools Gonda
                                                                                                .....Opposite Party(s)

                                     Counsel for Applicant(s)                       :   Saryu Prasad Tiwari
                                     Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                  :

                                    Court No. - 8
                                                             HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.

                                    Case has been called in the revised list.


                                    Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has
                                    been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.


                                    In view of above, the contempt application is dismissed for want of
                                    prosecution.


                                    Notice, if any, stands discharged.
                                    October 8, 2025
                                    Nitesh
                                                                                                (Manish Kumar,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NITESH KUMAR TEWARY
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.