Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PARVATIversusDR. VANDANA MISHRA, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNAUR

Decided

Holding

The contempt application is dismissed as infructuous because the order of the writ court has been complied with.

Summary

The writ court had directed the opposite party, Dr. Vandana Mishra, to complete proceedings under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The opposite party filed an affidavit stating that the proceedings were concluded on 31-10-2025, attaching the relevant document as Annexure 3. The court examined the affidavit and found that the directive had been complied with. Consequently, the contempt application filed by Parvati was deemed infructuous. The court discharged the contempt notice and dismissed the contempt application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt application should proceed when the order of the writ court has been complied with

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • compliance
  • writ jurisdiction
  • Section 116
  • U.P. Revenue Code
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4424 of 2025

                                    Parvati
                                                                                                  .....Applicant(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    Dr. Vandana Mishra, Sub Divisional Officer,
                                    Gunaur                                                           .....Opposite
                                                                                                           Party(s)

                                    Counsel for Applicant(s)                          :   Rakesh Kumar
                                    Counsel for Opposite Party(s)                     :


                                    Court No. - 9
                                                    HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. The writ Court had required the opposite party to conclude the
                                    proceedings under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

                                    2. In the affidavit of compliance, it has been stated that the proceedings have
                                    been concluded on 31.10.2025, copy of which, has been brought on record
                                    as Annexure 3 to the said affidavit.

                                    3. In view of said fact, as the order of writ Court has been complied with,
                                    present contempt application is rendered infructuous and the same stands
                                    dismissed.

                                    4. Contempt notice stands discharged.



                                                                                     (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    May 14, 2026
                                    SK Goswami




Digitally signed by :-
SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.