Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KASIM KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that the FIR should not be interfered with and dismissed the petition.

Summary

The petitioners, Kasim Khan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition under Article 226 challenging the registration of an FIR alleging that they were involved in negotiating a contract killing. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others, opposed the petition. The Court examined the FIR and noted that while the allegations were scanty, the nature of the accusation—contract killing—mandated a thorough and unhindered investigation. The judges held that the FIR could not be interfered with merely on the basis of its preliminary nature. Consequently, the Court declined to quash or modify the FIR. The petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a FIR alleging negotiation of a contract killing can be quashed under Article 226 of the Constitution despite being scanty in detail.

Subjects

  • contract killing
  • FIR
  • Article 226
  • quash petition
  • investigation
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10372 of 2026

                                    Kasim Khan And Another
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Naveen Kumar Yadav, Pradeep Kumar
                                                                        Yadav, Shantanu Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                            HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J.
                                                            HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    There are allegations of negotiating a contract killing. No doubt the
                                    allegations are scanty and prima facie in the FIR, there cannot be much
                                    material about it but looking to the nature of the allegations, we are of the
                                    opinion that this is a matter which requires thorough and unhindered
                                    investigation.

                                    We therefore, decline to interfere with the impugned FIR in exercise of our
                                    jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. This petition fails and is
                                    dismissed.



                                                                             (Tarun Saxena,J.) (J.J. Munir,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    C. MANI/ Prashant




Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRAMANI VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.