Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SATYAM GIRI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed; the FIR stands and no interference is ordered.

Summary

The petitioners, a group of locals, were named in an FIR after a Scorpio car hit a bicycle ridden by a 15‑year‑old boy and a parked car. In protest, the petitioners organized a blockade of the Mau‑Azamgarh Highway from 3:30 pm to 6:30 pm, causing traffic jams and preventing ambulances from reaching patients. The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking interference with the FIR, arguing that the blockade was a legitimate protest. The Court observed that the blockade constituted a serious obstruction of a national highway and that the FIR was properly lodged to investigate the incident. No ground was found to interfere with the FIR, and the petition was dismissed. The order was directed to be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Mau and the Station House Officer, Muhammadabad.

Issues considered

  • Whether the FIR filed against the petitioners can be quashed or interfered with by a criminal miscellaneous writ petition
  • Whether the blockade of a national highway by the petitioners amounts to a cognizable offence justifying the FIR

Subjects

  • FIR
  • highway obstruction
  • public nuisance
  • criminal miscellaneous writ petition
  • investigation interference
  • quash petition

Judgment

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10435 of 2026

Satyam Giri and others
                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                  Versus

State of U.P. and others
                                                         .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :   Harendra Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :   G.A.

Court No. - 47
                       HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J.
                       HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

1.   Heard Mr. Harendra Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioners and

Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwari, learned Additional Government Advocate on
behalf of the State.


2.   According to the First Information Report ('FIR' for short), a Scorpio

Car hit a bicycle, which a boy aged 15 years was riding. The boy was

injured. He was conveyed to Azamgarh for treatment. The Scorpio Car

also hit a parked car, which was standing at a place not meant for parking.

Regarding this incident, it is mentioned that locals, who are the

petitioners, Satyam Giri, Shivam Giri, Goli Giri and Sheshnath Giri,

garnered support of some 100-150 locals in the afternoon hours at 03:30,

brought barricading material, including bricks, and completely blocked

the main Mau-Azamgarh Highway. This blockade lasted from 03:30 p.m.

to 06:30 p.m., which led to long queues of vehicles on either side, which

were stranded. Even ambulances could not move, which were carrying

patients, as also other vehicles, carrying women and children. Their

condition worsened due to heat. Additional police force had to be

summoned to the spot, and after a lot of efforts, the blockade could be
                                                                                                   CRLP No. 10435 of 2026
                                                                       2


                                    removed. There was sloganeering against the administration.


                                    3.       The petitioners are named in the FIR, and as the learned Counsel

                                    appearing for them very fairly tells us, it was their car which was hit by

                                    the Scorpio Car, which the Police say was parked at a wrong place.

                                    Whatever it might be, the action of the petitioners in setting up a blockade

                                    on the Mau-Azamgarh Highway is a very serious matter. Highways are

                                    the lifeline of the country and even slightest obstruction could throw the

                                    even tempo of life out of gear. Looking to the nature of the allegations,

                                    this is a matter which requires a thorough investigation, and any

                                    interference with the impugned FIR would scuttle investigation beyond

                                    redemption.


                                    4.      No case for interference with the impugned FIR is made out.


                                    5.      In the result, this petition fails and is dismissed.


                                    6.      The Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate this order to

                                    the Superintendent of Police, Mau and the Station House Officer, Police

                                    Station Muhammadabad, Mau, both through the learned Chief Judicial

                                    Magistrate, Mau.



                                                                                (Tarun Saxena,J.) (J.J. Munir,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    I. Batabyal/S.K. Srivastava




Digitally signed by :-
ISHAN BATABYAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.