Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NAGENDRA KUMAR KULSHRESTHA @ NAGENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Nagendra Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner, through his counsel, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the mutual consent of the parties, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and with the respondent's consent?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil procedure
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10461 of 2026

                                    Nagendra Kumar Kulshrestha @ Nagendra Kumar
                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Akarsh Dwivedi, Varchasva Dwivedi,
                                                                     Yagyadhar Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 49
                                                     HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.

                                    Heard Mr. Akarsh Dwivedi, the learned counsel for petitioner and the
                                    learned A.G.A. for State/respondents-1 and 2.

                                    At the very outset, the learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received
                                    instructions in present writ petition.

                                    On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioner submits
                                    that petitioner himself does not wish to press the present writ petition.
                                    Ttherefore, the instant writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    Learned A.G.A. representing State/respondents- 1 and 2 has no objection
                                    to the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner.

                                    In view of above, the present writ petition shall stand dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    May 14, 2026
                                    Arshad

                                                                (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ARSHAD MAHMOOD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.