Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HEMANT SRIVASTAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Hemant Srivastav and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1135 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. After subsequent developments, they sought to withdraw the petition, filing a withdrawal application. The State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by the learned AGA, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal application. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn and any interim orders were vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners with the consent of the respondents

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction
  • procedural law
  • high court order
  • dismissal

Judgment

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
      CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1135 of 2025

Hemant Srivastav And Another
                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                             Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                               .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Haseeb      Alam  Ansari,
                                 Shantanu, Sheikh Moazzam
                                 Inam,     Vikram   Singh
                                 Shrivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s)      : G.A., Om Prakash

Court No. - 47




          HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.

          HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.

Ref:-Criminal Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 6 of 2026

1. Heard Mr. Haseeb Alam Ansari, the learned counsel for
petitioners, the learned AGA representing State-respondents 1,
2 and Mr. Om Prakash, the learned counsel representing first
informant-respondent 3.

2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that in view of
subsequent developments that have taken place petitioners do
not wish to press this writ petition any further. Accordingly,
petitioners have filed aforesaid withdrawal application seeking
dismissal of present writ petition as withdrawn.

3. Learned AGA representing State-respondents 1, 2 and the
learned counsel representing first informant/respondent 3 have
no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for
petitioners.

4. In view of above this withdrawal application is accordingly,
allowed.
                                                                                        CRLP No. 1135 of 2025
                                                                  2


                                        Order on Writ Petition

                                        1. In view of order of date passed on the withdrawal
                                        application the present writ petition shall stand dismissed as
                                        withdrawn.

                                        2. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                        March 18,
                                        2026
                                        Arti
                                                         (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
ARTI SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.