Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TARA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, and the petitioners are granted liberty to pursue other remedies.

Summary

The petitioners, Tara Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after a charge sheet was submitted in their case. They later moved the court to dismiss the writ petition as not pressed, indicating they might seek other legal remedies. The respondent State of U.P. and others, through their counsel, did not oppose the dismissal. The learned Additional Government Advocate also raised no objection. The Court, after considering the submissions, dismissed the writ petition as not pressed and granted the petitioners liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal miscellaneous writ petition should be dismissed as not pressed after the filing of the charge sheet

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • writ petition
  • not pressed
  • charge sheet
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20478 of 2026

                                    Tara Yadav And Another
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Prem Shankar Yadav, Ramesh Kumar
                                                                      Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Upon being informed that the charge sheet in the case has been
                                    submitted, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the writ petition be
                                    dismissed as not pressed, leaving it open to avail such remedy as might be
                                    available under the law.

                                    2. Learned AGA has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition.

                                    3. Under such circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed
                                    and liberty is granted to the petitioners to pursue such remedy as might be
                                    available to them.

                                    September 8, 2026
                                    safi
                                                          (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
MAHBOOB SAFI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.