Allahabad High Court
HARENDRA KUMAR AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The Court held that the writ petition is to be dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that a charge sheet had been filed against the petitioners. The petitioners' counsel then prayed for dismissal of the writ petition on the ground that it was no longer pressed. The respondent's counsel had no objection to such dismissal. The Court, after noting the filing of the charge sheet and the lack of any remaining issue, dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as not pressed in view of the filing of a charge sheet
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous
- dismissal
- not pressed
- charge sheet
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20483 of 2026
Harendra Kumar And 7 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suvash Ram, Vijay Prakash
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Upon being informed by the learned AGA that a charge sheet has been
submitted, learned counsel for the petitioners pray that the writ petition be
dismissed as not pressed.
2. Learned AGA has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition.
3. The writ petition, is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
(Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
September 8, 2026
PK
Digitally signed by :-
PRAVEEN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…