Allahabad High Court
RAVI PRATAPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The Court held that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioner, Ravi Pratap, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) informed the Court that a final report in the matter had been submitted. Both the petitioner’s counsel, Atul Kumar, and the respondent’s counsel, G.A., agreed that there was no longer any issue to be adjudicated. The Court considered whether the petition should be dismissed as not pressed. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as not pressed
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- not pressed
- criminal miscellaneous
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20490 of 2026
Ravi Pratap
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 16 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Upon being informed by the learned AGA that a final report has been
submitted, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ petition be
dismissed as not pressed.
2. Learned AGA has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition.
3. The writ petition, is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
(Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
September 8, 2026
PK
Digitally signed by :-
PRAVEEN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…