Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NASIR HUSSAINversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

A writ petition challenging an FIR is not maintainable once a charge sheet has been filed, and therefore must be dismissed.

Summary

The petitioners, represented by counsel Brijesh Kumar Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The State, represented by G.A., submitted an office report dated 22 April 2026 indicating that the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet rendered the challenge to the FIR moot, as the investigation had progressed to the stage of formal charges. Consequently, the Court held that the writ petition could not be entertained and should be dismissed. The petitioners were directed to seek any other legal remedy that may be available to them.

Issues considered

  • The writ petition challenging the FIR is maintainable after the filing of a charge sheet

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21388 of 2024

                                    Nasir Hussain
                                                                                                       .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                                    .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :   Brijesh Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised call. No one is present for the
                                    petitioner(s). Learned AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 22.4.2026 which is quoted as
                                    below :-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, U.P., the
                                    charge sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and
                                    since the writ petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the
                                    writ petition be dismissed and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner(s) may avail
                                    such remedy as might be available under law.


                                                             (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    April 23, 2026
                                    GS




Digitally signed by :-
GAUTAM SONI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.