Allahabad High Court
SWETA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Sweta and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioners, while the State's Advocate General was present. The Court noted the absence of prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Judges Vivek Varma and Garima Prashad on October 6, 2025.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22478 of 2025
Sweta And 3 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tahir Ali
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
HON'BLE MRS. GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list. Counsel for the petitioners is not
present.
2. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
3. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Mrs. Garima Prashad,J.) (Vivek Varma,J.)
October 6, 2025
Sachin Mishra
Digitally signed by :-
SACHIN MISHRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…