Allahabad High Court
MAYANK RAWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the charge sheet has been filed.
Summary
The petitioner, Mayank Rawat, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings after a charge sheet was filed. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the submission of the charge sheet rendered any further judicial intervention unnecessary. The respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, were represented by G.A. The High Court examined the submission and found no merit in continuing the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, noting that the matter was effectively resolved by the charge sheet. No further orders were issued.
Issues considered
- Whether the filing of a charge sheet makes a criminal miscellaneous writ petition infructuous and obviates the need for further judicial orders
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- writ petition
- charge sheet
- infructuous dismissal
- High Court of Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4598 of 2023
Mayank Rawat
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Pandey, Satya Prakash Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 42
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
1. Sri Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that in the
instant case charge sheet has been submitted and no further order is required
to be passed.
2. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
May 12, 2026
AKT
(Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…