Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BOBBY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed because the filing of a charge sheet precludes a challenge to the FIR.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge sheet had already been filed against the accused. The Court noted that the filing of a charge sheet renders a challenge to the FIR untenable. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition and consigned it to the record, directing the petitioners to seek any other legal remedy available. The decision was delivered by a bench of two judges on May 5, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging an FIR can be entertained after a charge sheet has been filed.

Subjects

  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • writ petition
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5360 of 2023

                                    Bobby And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Shantanu Pandey, Shashi Kant Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised call. No one is present for the
                                    petitioner(s). Learned AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 02.05.2026 which is quoted as
                                    below :-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of
                                    Police, U.P., the charge sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and
                                    since the writ petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the
                                    writ petition be dismissed and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner(s) may avail
                                    such remedy as might be available under law.


                                                         (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    PK




Digitally signed by :-
PRAVEEN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.