Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. ANU GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as the FIR cannot be challenged by a writ once the charge sheet has been filed.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Anu Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed. The Court noted that once a charge sheet is filed, the FIR cannot be contested through a writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as premature and ordered it to be consigned to the record. The petitioners were advised to seek any other legal remedy available under law.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging an FIR is maintainable after the filing of a charge sheet

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5482 of 2025

                                    Smt. Anu Gupta
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :   Mirza Faheem Beg
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                        HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised call. No one is present for the
                                    petitioners. Learned AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 02.05.2026 which is quoted as
                                    below :-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of
                                    Police, U.P., the charge sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and
                                    since the writ petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the
                                    writ petition be dismissed and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioners may avail
                                    such remedy as might be available under law.




                                                              (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    vijay krishna




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.