Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JANGALI @ BHAKUDI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners Jangali @ Bhakudi and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sant Ram Nigam, Nitin Dwivedi, Rama Kant Yadav and Vivek Kumar Yadav, were listed in the cause list but failed to appear at the hearing, even after a revised call. The State of U.P. and three others, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, were present. The Court observed that no one was present to press the petition on behalf of the petitioners and therefore dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner's counsel fails to appear

Subjects

  • procedural law
  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • high court procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5508 of 2026

                                    Jangali @ Bhakudi And 3 Others
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Sant Ram Nigam, Nitin Dwivedi, Rama
                                                                       Kant Yadav, Vivek Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 49
                                                     HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Even though the names of Mr. Sant Ram Nigam, Mr. Nitin Dwivedi,
                                    Mr. Rama Kant Yadav and Mr. Vivek Kumar Yadav are duly published in
                                    the cause list as counsel for petitioners but neither they nor anyone on
                                    their behalf is present to press this writ petition even in revised call.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1, 2 and 3 is present.

                                    4. Since no one appears on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition
                                    even in revised call, therefore, present writ petition is accordingly
                                    dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    5. Interim order, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated.



                                                                  (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    YK




Digitally signed by :-
YASHWANT KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.