Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. PRACHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

A writ petition challenging an FIR is not maintainable once the charge‑sheet has been filed, and therefore must be dismissed.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Prachi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that the charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police. The Court observed that once a charge‑sheet is filed, the FIR issue is no longer maintainable before the court. Consequently, the judges dismissed the writ petition as barred and directed the petitioners to seek any other remedy available under law. The petition was therefore consigned to the record and dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging the FIR can be entertained after the charge‑sheet has been filed

Subjects

  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • writ petition
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5518 of 2025

                                    Smt. Prachi And Another
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)               :   Satya Narayan Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)               :   Abhay Raj Yadav, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised call. No one is present for the
                                    petitioner(s). Learned AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 02.05.2026 which is quoted as
                                    below :-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of
                                    Police, U.P., the charge sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and
                                    since the writ petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the
                                    writ petition be dismissed and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner(s) may avail
                                    such remedy as might be available under law.


                                                         (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 5, 2026
                                    PK




Digitally signed by :-
PRAVEEN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.