Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition challenging the FIR was dismissed as the charge sheet had already been filed.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised call before a two‑judge bench of the Allahabad High Court. The court noted that, per a report dated 02‑05‑2026, the charge sheet in the matter had already been filed by the Director General of Police. Since the charge sheet was on record, the court held that the writ petition, which sought to contest the FIR, could not be entertained. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and consigned to the record, with the court indicating that the petitioners could pursue any other legal remedy available. The decision was pronounced on 5 May 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate remedy when a writ petition challenges an FIR after a charge sheet has been filed?

Subjects

  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • FIR
  • Writ Petition
  • Charge Sheet
  • High Court
  • Dismissal

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5519 of 2022

                                    Santosh Kumar Gupta
                                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                            Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                                 :     Manoj Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                                 :     G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                        HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised call. No one is present for the petitioners. Learned
                                    AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 02.05.2026 which is quoted as below :-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, U.P., the
                                    charge sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and since the writ
                                    petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the writ petition be dismissed
                                    and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioners may avail such remedy
                                    as might be available under law.

                                    May 5, 2026
                                    vijay krishna
                                                                   (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.