Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANITA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed because the charge sheet had already been filed, rendering the challenge to the FIR untenable.

Summary

Petitioner Anita Katiyar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR filed against her. The petition was heard in the revised call with no petitioner present, while the State was represented by counsel. The court noted that the charge sheet in the case had already been filed, as per a report from the Director General of Police's Legal Cell dated 2 May 2026. Since the charge sheet was on record, the court held that the writ petition, which sought to contest the FIR, could not proceed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and consigned to the record, with a direction that the petitioner may pursue any other legal remedy available.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging an FIR can be entertained after the charge sheet has been filed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5539 of 2022

                                    Anita Katiyar
                                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                            Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                        :   Ramesh Chandra Agrahari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                        :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                        HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised call. No one is present for the petitioner. Learned
                                    AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 02.05.2026 which is quoted as below :-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, U.P., the
                                    charge sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and since the writ
                                    petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the writ petition be dismissed
                                    and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner may avail such remedy
                                    as might be available under law.

                                    May 5, 2026
                                    vijay krishna
                                                                   (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.