Allahabad High Court
ABHISHEK @ ABHISHEK KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to file an application under Section 528 CrPC.
Summary
Petitioners Abhishek Kumar and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 28‑01‑2026 and the subsequent charge sheet filed under various provisions of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The State argued that the charge sheet exonerated petitioner‑1 and only charge‑sheeted petitioner‑2, leaving no cause of action for the writ. The petitioners could not rebut this contention and conceded that the appropriate remedy was an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court therefore dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to approach the Court under Section 528, and vacated any interim order.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition is maintainable after the filing of a charge sheet that exonerates the petitioner.
- Whether the High Court can entertain the writ petition or should direct the petitioner to file an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 115(2), 191(2), 193(3), 210, 351(3), 352, 528
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — s. 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha), 3(2)(va)
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- FIR
- charge sheet
- Section 528 CrPC
- maintainability
- SC/ST Act
- petition dismissed
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5542 of 2026
Abhishek @ Abhishek Kumar And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dileep Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 49
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. Dileep Kumar Srivastava, the learned counsel for petitioners
and the learned A.G.A. for State respondents 1 and 2.
2. Perused the record
3. Petitioners-Abhishek @ Abhishek Kumar And Another have approached
this Court by means of present criminal misc. writ petition challenging the
FIR dated 28.01.2026 lodged by first informant-respondent-3, Rohit Kumar
and registered as Case Crime No. 0058 of 2026, under Sections 191(2),
115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., and 3(1) (da), (3(1) (dha), 3(2) (va) of
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989, Police Station-Kasiya, District- Kushinagar.
4. On the matter being taken up, the learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1
and 2 submits that after completion of statutory investigation of concerned
case crime number in terms of Chapter XIII BNSS, Investigating Officer has
forwarded the charge sheet/police report dated 20.02.2026 in terms of
Section 193(3) BNSS. By means of aforesaid police report/charge sheet
petitioner-1 Abhishek @ Abhishek Kumar has been exculpated, whereas,
petitioner-2 Akhilesh has been charge sheeted. As such, no cause of action
now survives with the petitioners to maintain the present writ petition. In
view of above remedy now lies to the petitioners to approach this Court by
means of an application under Section 528 BNSS challenging
aforementioned charge sheet/police report as well as the cognizance taking
order/summoning order to be passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrate in
exercise of jurisdiction under Section 210 BNSS.
CRLP No. 5542 of 2026
2
5. When confronted with above, the learned counsel for petitioners could not
overcome the same. He however fairly submits that in view of the
submissions made by the learned A.G.A. in opposition to present writ
petition, the present writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to
petitioners to approach this Court by means of an application under Section
528 BNSS.
6. In view of above, the prayer prayed for by means of present writ petition
is refused.
7. Having heard, the learned counsel for petitioners, the learned A.G.A. for
State respondents 1 and 2 upon perusal of record and considering the
objection raised by the learned A.G.A. in opposition to present writ petition,
we direct that present writ petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty to petitioners to approach this Court by means of an application under
Section 528 BNSS.
8. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
April 20, 2026
Imtiyaz
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
IMTIYAZ AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…