Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AAKANKSHA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as the charge sheet has already been filed.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged against them. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted a report indicating that the charge sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police. The Court observed that since the charge sheet was on record, the petition challenging the FIR could not be entertained. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition and directed the petitioners to seek any other remedy available under law. The dismissal was ordered on May 5, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging an FIR can be entertained after the filing of a charge sheet

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • writ petition
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5581 of 2022

                                    Aakanksha And 5 Others
                                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                            Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           :   Ashok Kumar Yadav, Jitendra Singh, Vikas
                                                                            Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           :   G.A., Munna Babu

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                        HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised call. No one is present for the petitioners. Learned
                                    AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 02.05.2026 which is quoted as below :-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, U.P., the
                                    charge sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and since the writ
                                    petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the writ petition be dismissed
                                    and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioners may avail such remedy
                                    as might be available under law.

                                    May 5, 2026
                                    vijay krishna
                                                                   (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.