Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

PARVEZ AKHTAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

A writ petition challenging an FIR is not maintainable once the charge-sheet has been filed.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of the FIR against them. The petition was heard in the revised list with no petitioner present, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already been filed, as per the report from the Legal Cell of the Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police dated 4 May 2026. Since the charge-sheet was on record, the court held that the writ petition, which sought to contest the FIR, could not be entertained. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition and directed the petitioners to seek any other appropriate legal remedy.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging an FIR can be entertained after the filing of a charge-sheet

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6198 of 2025

                                    Parvez Akhtar And 4 Others
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                  .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                             :    Vinit Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                             :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                      HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised list. No one is present for the petitioner (s).
                                    Learned AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 4.5.2026 which is quoted as
                                    below:-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police,
                                    U.P., the charge-sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and since
                                    the writ petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the writ
                                    petition be dismissed and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner (s) may avail
                                    such remedy as might be available under law.



                                                            (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    LN Tripathi




Digitally signed by :-
LALIT TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.