Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

YADVENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition challenging the FIR is not maintainable after the charge‑sheet has been filed, and therefore the petition is dismissed.

Summary

Yadvendra Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR lodged against him. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed by the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh. The Court observed that once a charge‑sheet is filed, the FIR is no longer a live subject for a writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as it was not maintainable. The Court directed the petitioner to seek any other remedy available under law.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR is maintainable after a charge‑sheet has been filed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • Allahabad
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6302 of 2025

                                    Yadvendra Singh
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                  .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Mool Chandra Maurya, Sanjeev Kumar
                                                                        Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : Vimal Kumar Pandey, Amit Kumar
                                                                        Yadav, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised list. No one is present for the petitioner (s).
                                    Learned AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 4.5.2026 which is quoted as
                                    below:-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police,
                                    U.P., the charge-sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and since
                                    the writ petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the writ
                                    petition be dismissed and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner (s) may avail
                                    such remedy as might be available under law.



                                                           (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    safi




Digitally signed by :-
MAHBOOB SAFI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.