Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AMARJIT NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition challenging the FIR is not maintainable after the charge‑sheet has been filed, and the petition is dismissed.

Summary

Amarjit Nishad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The State, represented by the Assistant Government Advocate, submitted an office report indicating that a charge‑sheet had already been filed against the petitioner. The Court observed that once a charge‑sheet is filed, the FIR is no longer amenable to judicial scrutiny under a writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition and directed the petitioner to seek any other remedy available under law. The petition was therefore consigned to the record.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR is maintainable after a charge‑sheet has been filed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 642 of 2023

                                    Amarjit Nishad
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                  .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Arvind Prabodh Dubey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : G.A., Kumar Ashutosh Srivastava,
                                                                        Nagendra Pratap Singh

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised list. No one is present for the petitioner (s).
                                    Learned AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 4.5.2026 which is quoted as
                                    below:-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police,
                                    U.P., the charge-sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and since
                                    the writ petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the writ
                                    petition be dismissed and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner (s) may avail
                                    such remedy as might be available under law.



                                                           (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    LN Tripathi




Digitally signed by :-
LALIT TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.