Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BOBY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

A writ petition challenging an FIR cannot be entertained after a charge-sheet has been filed and must be dismissed.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the registration of an FIR. The petition was filed after the police had already filed a charge-sheet, as confirmed by a report from the Legal Cell of the Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the learned Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The court held that once a charge-sheet is filed, the FIR can no longer be quashed through a writ petition and the petition must be dismissed. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed and consigned to the record, with the petitioners directed to seek any other remedy available under law.

Issues considered

  • What is the propriety of entertaining a writ petition challenging an FIR after the filing of a charge-sheet?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • FIR
  • charge sheet
  • criminal procedure
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7124 of 2025

                                    Boby And Another
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                                  .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :    Sunil Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Case is taken up in the revised list. No one is present for the petitioner (s).
                                    Learned AGA is present for the State.

                                    2. We have perused the office report dated 05.05.2026 which is quoted as
                                    below:-

                                    "As per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police,
                                    U.P., the charge-sheet has been filed."

                                    3. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and since
                                    the writ petition is challenging the FIR, we are of the view that the writ
                                    petition be dismissed and it be consigned to record.

                                    4. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner (s) may avail
                                    such remedy as might be available under law.



                                                           (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    AKT




Digitally signed by :-
ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.