Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

FAUZIA KHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary

The petitioners, Ms. Fauzia Khan and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 7414 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two other respondents. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners, Ravi Anand Agarwal and Shreya Gupta, submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court examined whether the petition could still be entertained or should be dismissed as moot. Relying on the principle that a writ petition that loses its purpose because of elapsed time is infructuous, the Court held that there was no longer any live controversy. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Judges Siddhartha Varma and Jai Krishna Upadhyay on May 7, 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the effect of the efflux of time on the viability of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition?
  • Should the petition be dismissed as infructuous?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • limitation
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7414 of 2025

                                    Fauzia Khan And 3 Others
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Ravi Anand Agarwal, Shreya Gupta
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Arya Suman Pandey, G.A., Tushar
                                                                      Pandey, Yogesh Narayan Shukla

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Ms. Akriti Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
                                    petitioners submits that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become
                                    infructuous and it may be dismissed as having become infructuous.

                                    2. As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.



                                                          (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    S.K.S.




Digitally signed by :-
SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.