Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AJAY KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the filing of the charge sheet terminated the basis for relief.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them in a case pending before the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, rendering the petition moot. The court considered whether any further relief could be granted after the filing of the charge sheet. It held that the filing of the charge sheet made the writ petition infructuous and there was no basis for further orders. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition remains maintainable after the charge sheet has been filed in the underlying criminal case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • criminal procedure
  • charge sheet
  • infructuous
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7477 of 2025

                                    Ajay Kumar And 6 Others
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Abdul Majeed,        Sufia     Saba,     Syed
                                                                     Shahid Jafri
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 42
                                                     HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.

                                    1. Sri Farookh Nabi, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the
                                    writ petition has been rendered infructuous as charge sheet in this case has
                                    been filed.

                                    2. Under such circumstances, no further order is required to be passed.
                                    The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become
                                    infructuous.



                                                         (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    May 7, 2026
                                    S.K.S.




Digitally signed by :-
SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.