Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANKUR YADAVversusSMT. RINKY YADAV

Decided

Holding

The appeal was dismissed as not pressed.

Summary

Ankur Yadav filed a first appeal against Smt. Rinky Yadav in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the appellant, Anwar Ali, informed the court that the appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. The respondent's counsel did not object to this request. The court, noting the appellant's intention not to press the appeal and the lack of objection, dismissed the appeal as not pressed. No substantive merits of the dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal can be dismissed on the ground that the appellant does not wish to press it

Subjects

  • appeal
  • dismissal
  • not pressed
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                        FIRST APPEAL No. - 325 of 2019

                                    Ankur Yadav
                                                                                                  .....Appellant(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    Smt. Rinky Yadav
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Appellant(s)         : Anwar Ali, Manoj Kumar Rajvanshi,
                                                                       Sanjai Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Pradeep
                                                                       Kumar Singh

                                    Court No. - 4
                                                    HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
                                                    HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri Anwar Ali, learned counsel for appellant and Sri Pradeep
                                    Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent.

                                    2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that he does not want to press the
                                    appeal, therefore, it may be dismissed as not pressed, which is not objected
                                    by counsel for respondent.

                                    3. Accordingly, first appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Sartaj
                                                                 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SARTAJ AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.