Allahabad High Court
ABHISHEK RAIversusSMT. RINKI RAI
- Decided
Holding
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellant, Abhishek Rai, failed to appear before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad even after a revised call. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. No further arguments or evidence were presented. The respondent, Smt. Rinki Rai, was represented by counsel. The judgment was pronounced on May 5, 2026, and the appeal was dismissed.
Subjects
- appeal dismissed
- want of prosecution
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
FIRST APPEAL No. - 62 of 2026
Abhishek Rai
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Smt. Rinki Rai
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Sr. Advocate, Tejas Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Chandra Shekhar Rai
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. None appears for the appellant, even in the revised call.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Sri Chandra Shekhar Rai, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent.
May 5, 2026
Noman
(Vivek Saran,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NOMAN AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…