Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

BHARAT TOMARversusSMT. NEETU

Decided

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The appellant, Bharat Tomar, filed a first appeal (No. 770 of 2022) against a decision involving Smt. Neetu. During the hearing, the appellant's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the appeal. The court, noting the request, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were examined. The judgment was pronounced on May 12, 2026, by Judges Vivek Saran and Atul Sreedharan.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • procedural dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                         FIRST APPEAL No. - 770 of 2022

                                    Bharat Tomar
                                                                                              .....Appellant(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Smt. Neetu
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Appellant(s)         : Ram Raj Pandey, Shubham Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        :

                                    Court No. - 2
                                                     HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
                                                     HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the appellant wants to withdraw the present appeal.

                                    2. Under the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                      (Vivek Saran,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
                                    May 12, 2026
                                    Noman




Digitally signed by :-
NOMAN AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.