Allahabad High Court
SMT. VIDYAWATI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusTHE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL AND ANOTHER
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Smt. Vidyawati Devi and another filed a Special Appeal (No. 1594 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court against the District Inspector of School and another. The appellants were represented by counsel A.K. Roy and Anil Bhushan, while the respondents were represented by C.S.C. No appellant appeared before the Court even after a revised call. The Court noted the absence of the parties and their counsel. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal on the ground of want of prosecution. The judgment was delivered on May 5, 2026, and signed by the judges.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal can be proceeded with in the absence of the appellant's appearance?
Subjects
- procedural law
- appeal
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- court procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1594 of 2013
Smt. Vidyawati Devi And Another
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
The District Inspector Of School And Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : A.K.Roy, Anil Bhushan
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. None appears for the appellants, even in the revised call.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
May 5, 2026
Noman
(Vivek Saran,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NOMAN AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…