Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SANDEEP TITORIYAversusUNION OF INDIA AND 8 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as not pressed, as the petitioner does not sufficiently represent the aggrieved public.

Summary

The petitioner, Sandeep Titoriya, filed a public interest litigation before the Allahabad High Court alleging that he represented the aggrieved public. The court was asked to determine whether the petitioner had the requisite standing to file the writ and whether the petition was pressed. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the petition should be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition. The State's standing counsel raised no objection to such dismissal. After considering the lack of sufficient representation of the public and the unpressed nature of the petition, the court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, granting the petitioner permission to file a fresh petition if desired.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner has locus standi to file the PIL on behalf of the aggrieved public
  • Whether the writ petition is pressed
  • Whether dismissal with liberty to file a fresh petition is appropriate

Subjects

  • public interest litigation
  • locus standi
  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • not pressed

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                  PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2278 of 2026

                                    Sandeep Titoriya
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                           Versus

                                    Union Of India And 8 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Ashok Kumar Pandey, Virendra Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : A.S.G.I., Arjun Singh, Komal Mehrotra

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                        HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                    1. Upon a definite question being asked as to in what manner the petitioner
                                    is representing the aggrieved public, learned counsel for the petitioner prays
                                    that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to file a fresh
                                    petition.

                                    2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State has no objection to the dismissal
                                    of the writ petition as not pressed.

                                    3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with the
                                    liberty aforeprayed.



                                                                 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    M.S. Ansari




Digitally signed by :-
MOHD SAQIB ANSARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.