Allahabad High Court
RAGHVENDRA PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY SECYNDARY EDUATION
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Petitioner Raghvendra Pandey filed writ petition No. 1689 of 2005 before the Allahabad High Court. The petition was listed for hearing, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The court noted that the list of cases was being revised and, due to the absence of the petitioner’s representation, dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The order was dated 12 February 2025 and signed by Justice Gaurav Patel.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear for prosecution of a writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
- procedural default
Judgment
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1689 of 2005
Petitioner :- Raghvendra Pandey
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secy Secyndary Eduation
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Pandey,Manushresth
Misra,Vinay Prakash Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,H.S.Jain
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
1. List of cases is being revised. No one is present on behalf of
the petitioner.
2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.2.2025
Gaurav
Digitally signed by :-
GAURAV PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Checking your session…