Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VEENA SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court ordered the bank to move the Rs.10,000 to its escrow account and unfreeze the petitioner’s account, directing the bank to refund the amount to the actual owner.

Summary

The petitioner, Veena Singh, filed a writ petition alleging that her bank account was frozen after a Rs.10,000 online fraud transaction, reported by Coimbatore Police, was credited to her account. She claimed ignorance of how the amount was deposited and sought relief to access her funds. The court examined the petition and found no objection from the petitioner to the proposed remedy. It directed the respondent bank to transfer the disputed Rs.10,000 into its escrow account and subsequently unfreeze the petitioner’s account, allowing her to withdraw her own funds. The bank was also instructed to refund the amount to the actual owner from whose account the money was originally taken. With these directions, the writ petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, is appropriate when a bank account is frozen due to an alleged online fraud amount credited to the account holder?
  • Whether the bank should transfer the disputed amount to an escrow account and unfreeze the petitioner’s account pending refund to the true owner.

Subjects

  • online fraud
  • account freeze
  • escrow
  • bank liability
  • writ petition

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                           WRIT - C No. - 10289 of 2026

                                    Veena Singh
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    Union Of India And 2 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Amit Kumar Srivastava, Rajesh Kumar
                                                                       Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : A.S.G.I., Anadi Krishna Narayana,
                                                                       Shashi Dhar Sahai, Vivek Tripathi

                                    Court No. - 2
                                                      HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J.
                                                      HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shashi Dhar Sahai,
                                    learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on account of
                                    information received from the Coimbatore Police with regard to an online
                                    fraud of Rs.10,000/- which has been deposited with the account of the
                                    petitioner, the account of the petitioner has been frozen.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not aware as to how
                                    the said offending amount was deposited in his account.

                                    4. Under the circumstances, this petition is disposed of by directing the
                                    respondent Bank to take down the amount of Rs.10,000/- from the account
                                    of the petitioner into Escrow Account of the Bank and thereafter unfreeze
                                    the account of the petitioner so that she may withdraw her amount, to which
                                    petitioner has no objection.

                                    5. It will be responsibility of the Bank to refund the amount to the actual
                                    owner from whose account the said amount was taken and deposited in the
                                    account of the petitioner.

                                    6. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

                                    March 19, 2026
                                    R.S. Tiwari
                                                                 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
RAVI SHANKAR TIWARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.