Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANUP KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Anup Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel identified defects in the petition and expressed a desire not to pursue it further. The State respondents and the contesting respondent’s counsel raised no objection to the petition being dismissed as not pressed. The Court considered the counsel’s request and the lack of opposition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition if desired.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as not pressed due to procedural defects

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • not pressed
  • procedural defect

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                WRIT - C No. - 1163 of 2026

                                    Anup Kumar Singh
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           : Pratik Ranjan Singh, Rajesh Kumar
                                                                          Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           : C.S.C., Pratik J. Nagar

                                    Court No. - 29
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
                                                         HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State
                                    respondents and Sri Pratik J. Nagar, learned counsel for the contesting
                                    respondent are present.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are
                                    certain defects in the writ petition, as such he does not want to press the
                                    present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with the
                                    liberty to file a fresh petition.

                                    3. Learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for the contesting
                                    respondent have no objection in case the writ petition is dismissed as not
                                    pressed.

                                    4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the
                                    aforesaid liberty.



                                                                  (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
                                    September 29, 2026
                                    Sumit S




Digitally signed by :-
SUMIT SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.