Allahabad High Court
SUDHIR KUMAR TIWARI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Petitioners Sudhir Kumar Tiwari and others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that, due to subsequent developments, the petition had become infructuous. The respondents did not object to this submission. The Court, noting the lack of objection and the counsel's statement, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and vacated any interim order that had been in force. No substantive merits of the original petition were addressed.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition that has become infructuous due to subsequent developments?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- interim order vacated
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 12900 of 2026
Sudhir Kumar Tiwari And 8 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, Kripa Shankar
Pandey, Ashish Jaiswal
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sant Ram Sharma
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Shri Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that considering the subsequent development, this writ petition
may be dismissed as infructuous.
2. The aforesaid prayer has not been objected by Shri Sant Ram Sharma,
Advocate along with Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for
respondents.
3. In light of such facts the writ petition is dismissed as infructous.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
May 7, 2026
Nadeem
Digitally signed by :-
NADEEM AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…