Allahabad High Court
ANAND PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Petitioner Anand Prakash filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Arpit Malviya, submitted that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The respondents' counsel, Anil Kumar Singh Baghel, did not oppose this submission. The Court considered the submission and, finding no objection, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition that has become infructuous?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- High Court
- Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 13674 of 2026
Anand Prakash
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpit Malviya, Awadhesh Kumar
Malviya
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anil Kumar Singh Baghel, C.S.C.
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Shri Arpit Malviya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
writ petition has become infructous and may be dismissed as infructous.
2. Shri Anil Kumar Singh Baghel and learned Standing Counsel do not
object to the same.
3. In light of such facts, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
May 7, 2026
Nadeem
Digitally signed by :-
NADEEM AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…