Allahabad High Court
RATNAKAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently sought to withdraw it. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, and the respondents’ counsel raised no objection. The court, noting the mutual consent and lack of any pending interim relief, dismissed the petition as withdrawn without further liberty. Consequently, any interim order that may have been in force was discharged. The decision reflects the court’s procedural discretion to allow withdrawal of a petition when both parties agree.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and the respondents' consent
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- writ petition
- dismissal
- procedural order
- interim relief discharge
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17863 of 2026
Ratnakar Pandey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Lal, Shiva Kant Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Agrawal, C.S.C.
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner wants to withdraw
this petition and as such the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Sri Shrey Singh, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the
above.
In view of the above, this petition dismissed as withdrawn without any
further liberty.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)
May 6, 2026
IrfanUddin
Digitally signed by :-
IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…