Allahabad High Court
TASLEEMversusState of UP AND 5 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Petitioner Tasleem filed Writ Petition No. 22067 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petition was argued by counsel Irshad Ahmad and Navin Kumar Srivastava. Respondents were represented by Aditiya Kumar Singh, Arun Kumar Pandey, Mohan Yadav and Suneel Kumar Mishra. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous and should be dismissed
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous dismissal
- Civil Procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 22067 of 2024
Tasleem
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Irshad Ahmad, Navin Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aditiya Kumar Singh, Arun Kumar
Pandey, Mohan Yadav, Suneel Kumar
Mishra
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Sri Navin Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner, learned
standing counsel for State-respondents and Sri Aditya Kumar Singh, learned
counsel for respondent no. 5.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that this petition may be
dismissed as infructuous.
3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
May 5, 2026
Sartaj
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SARTAJ AHMAD
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…